Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2605.06234

RobotEQ: Towards Social Proactive Intelligence in Embodied Agents

Abstract

Embodied agents represent a prominent research focus across both academia and industry. The prevailing paradigm has gradually shifted from reactive assistance, which requires explicit user queries, to proactive assistance, capable of recognizing human needs and offering support without explicit instructions. Nevertheless, existing studies on proactive assistance remain confined to narrow scenarios and primarily emphasize task completeness, whereas real-world agents must operate in open-domain environments while adhering to social expectations. To bridge this gap, we extend the concept of proactive assistance to Social Proactive Intelligence (SPI), characterized by diverse scenarios, social understanding, and robot-centric behaviors. We further introduce RobotEQ, a dedicated benchmark for SPI. We first define two tasks: behavior judgment, emphasizing global contextual understanding, and spatial grounding, focusing on local perceptual details. Building on these tasks, we construct RobotEQ-Data, a dataset comprising 1,812 synthetic and 223 real-world scenarios, 7 social facets, 22K+ human annotations, 3K+ behavior judgment questions, and 3K+ spatial grounding questions. Furthermore, we establish RobotEQ-Bench to evaluate the performance of representative models. Experimental results demonstrate that current models fall short of achieving reliable SPI. Further analysis reveals that incorporating external social knowledge yields consistent improvements. This work aims to advance the development of socially desirable embodied agents in open-domain environments.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Kuofei Fang, Zheng Lian, Xinyi Che, Haomin Ouyang, Shufan Zhang, Xuehao Wang, Qi Liu, Liyi Liu, Chenqi Zhang, Wenxi Cai, Wenyu Dai, Jinyang Wu, Fan Zhang, Haoyu Chen, Xiaobai Li, Bin He. 2026-09-07. RobotEQ: Towards Social Proactive Intelligence in Embodied Agents. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.06234

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Feelium: A Touchable Blimp Body for Aerial Telepresence

Floating things invite touch. We present Feelium, a blimp-based telepresence platform that enables visual embodiment and touch interaction through its inflatable skin. Through a VR headset, a remote person inhabits the blimp, looking out of it first-person, appearing on its skin as a face or avatar, and steering it through the room. Partners in the room pat it, press a palm against it, draw on it, or lean into it; the skin senses each contact, renders it into the wearer's view in VR spaces. Touch thus provides a physical interaction channel for remote presence, turning the skin into a shared surface between remote and co-located partners.

cs.HC

CALM: Configuration-Aware Human Intervention Boundaries During Robot Approach

How robot body configuration shapes human intervention during approach remains underexplored. We conducted a within-participants study with 41 participants, measuring final stopping distance, subjective comfort, and exploratory eye-tracking responses across four humanoid arm configurations and two spatial scales. Full forward arm extension increased stopping distance by approximately 31-36 cm relative to arms-down. Spatial scale primarily affected comfort and pupil responses without a detectable stopping-distance shift. We introduce the Configuration-Aware Limit Model (CALM), which translates stopping-distance distributions into configuration-dependent population-coverage boundaries. Estimated boundaries at 80% coverage ranged from 0.88 to 1.47 m. In an illustrative one-dimensional planning analysis, reconfiguration enabled a 1.10 m approach goal that was unreachable with arms remaining fully extended under the same nominal pointwise 20% intervention-probability constraint. These findings support treating body configuration as a planning variable while distinguishing physical safety, behavioral intervention, and subjective cost.

cs.RO

Can People Distinguish Human and AI Agency in Humanoid Teleoperation? A Preliminary Study of Agency Perception

Can people distinguish between human and AI agency in humanoid teleoperation? To explore this question, we developed \textit{Ghost-in-the-Loop}, a teleoperation framework that supports both human-operated and AI-generated control of a robot's voice, facial expressions, and gestures while maintaining a consistent embodiment. We conducted a preliminary online study ($N=50$) in which participants viewed short interaction clips generated by either a Human Operator or an AI Control and judged the perceived source of control. Results suggest that participants often struggled to distinguish between the two conditions in brief interactions. Qualitative responses indicate that judgments were primarily influenced by perceived naturalness, temporal coordination, and consistency across speech, facial expression, and gesture. These findings provide initial insights into agency perception in embodied human--AI communication and motivate future investigations of blended human--AI telepresence systems.

cs.HC