MindGap: A Conversational AI Framework for Upstream Neuroplastic Intervention in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

Eranga Bandara; Ross Gore; Asanga Gunaratna; Ravi Mukkamala; Nihal Siriwardanagea; Sachini Rajapakse; Isurunima Kularathna; Pramoda Karunarathna; Wathsala Herath; Chalani Rajapakse; Sachin Shetty; Anita H. Clayton; Christopher K. Rhea; Ng Wee Keong; Kasun De Zoysa; Amin Hass; Shaifali Kaushik; Preston Samuel; Atmaram Yarlagadda

arXiv · 2605.14660

MindGap: A Conversational AI Framework for Upstream Neuroplastic Intervention in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

Eranga Bandara·Ross Gore·Asanga Gunaratna·Ravi Mukkamala·Nihal Siriwardanagea·Sachini Rajapakse·Isurunima Kularathna·Pramoda Karunarathna·Wathsala Herath·Chalani Rajapakse·Sachin Shetty·Anita H. Clayton·Christopher K. Rhea·Ng Wee Keong·Kasun De Zoysa·Amin Hass·Shaifali Kaushik·Preston Samuel·Atmaram Yarlagadda

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is fundamentally a neuroplastic problem traumatic contact events encode over-reactive neural pathways through Hebbian long-term potentiation, producing hair-triggered amygdala-HPA stress cascades that fire before conscious awareness can intercept them. Existing therapeutic approaches, prolonged exposure, EMDR, cognitive behavioural therapy, operate predominantly downstream of the reactive cascade, teaching patients to tolerate or reframe distress after it has arisen. While clinically valuable, these suppression-based approaches do not produce the upstream pathway dissolution that constitutes lasting structural neural reorganisation. This paper proposes MindGap, a privacy-preserving on-device conversational AI framework that delivers structured neuroplastic rehabilitation for PTSD through the practice of dependent origination, a Buddhist psychological framework that identifies the precise moment between the pre-cognitive affective signal and the reactive elaboration that follows as the site of therapeutic intervention. MindGap guides patients through three progressive layers of observation at this feeling tone gap: noticing the bare affective signal before reactive elaboration, recognising it as self-arising rather than caused by the stimulus, and recognising the conditioned implicit belief beneath the feeling. Each layer corresponds to progressively deeper prefrontal regulatory engagement and progressively deeper long-term depression-mediated weakening of the reactive pathway, producing genuine upstream dissolution rather than downstream suppression. Running entirely on-device with no data egress, MindGap delivers daily calibrated exposure sessions through a fine-tuned lightweight large language model, making it deployable in sensitive clinical and military contexts where cloud-based solutions are not permitted.

Explore related subjects

cs.AI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Eranga Bandara, Ross Gore, Asanga Gunaratna, Ravi Mukkamala, Nihal Siriwardanagea, Sachini Rajapakse, Isurunima Kularathna, Pramoda Karunarathna, Wathsala Herath, Chalani Rajapakse, Sachin Shetty, Anita H. Clayton, Christopher K. Rhea, Ng Wee Keong, Kasun De Zoysa, Amin Hass, Shaifali Kaushik, Preston Samuel, Atmaram Yarlagadda. 2026-05-14. MindGap: A Conversational AI Framework for Upstream Neuroplastic Intervention in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.14660

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Memory-Free Continual Learning with Null Space Adaptation for Zero-Shot Vision-Language Models

Pre-trained vision-language models (VLMs), such as CLIP, have demonstrated remarkable zero-shot generalization, enabling deployment in a wide range of real-world tasks without additional task-specific training. However, in real deployment scenarios with evolving environments or emerging classes, these models inevitably face distributional shifts and novel tasks. In such contexts, static zero-shot capabilities are insufficient, and there is a growing need for continual learning methods that allow models to adapt over time while avoiding catastrophic forgetting. We introduce NuSA-CL (Null Space Adaptation for Continual Learning), a lightweight memory-free continual learning framework designed to address this challenge. NuSA-CL employs low-rank adaptation and constrains task-specific weight updates to lie within an approximate null space of the model's current parameters. This strategy minimizes interference with previously acquired knowledge, effectively preserving the zero-shot capabilities of the original model. Unlike methods relying on replay buffers or costly distillation, NuSA-CL imposes minimal computational and memory overhead, making it practical for deployment in resource-constrained, real-world continual learning environments. Experiments show that our framework not only effectively preserves zero-shot transfer capabilities but also achieves highly competitive performance on continual learning benchmarks. These results position NuSA-CL as a practical and scalable solution for continually evolving zero-shot VLMs in real-world applications.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

VeRA: Renewing Reasoning Benchmarks with Executable Specifications

Reasoning benchmarks need renewal along two axes: freshness and headroom. VeRA makes both executable and auditable by turning each item into a task family: a natural-language template, an input generator, and a deterministic answer program. VeRA-E draws fresh instances within a family; VeRA-H modifies the family toward harder tasks; and VeRA-H Pro selects one judge-ranked candidate from up to five validated proposals per seed. Execution checks, seed anchoring, answer discrimination, and independent human solving validate specifications and items. Accepted programs generate further labeled instances through local computation. Across 16 models, AIME-2024 accuracy decreases from 84.46% on seeds to 70.25% on VeRA-E variants, exposing a gap between fixed-item success and fresh-instance robustness. On AIME-2024-II, the human-audited VeRA-H Pro release lowers accuracy from 84.91% to 58.57%. Across the three hardening sources, H Pro has lower mean accuracy than H. On AMO-Bench, both releases average higher accuracy than the seeds under the evaluated budget. Initial auditing accepts 75.4% of hardened candidates; targeted repair raises usable yield to 95.1%. Executable families thus support repeatable benchmark renewal, with validation improving task quality and selection shaping the delivered challenge.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

When can we trust untrusted monitoring? A safety case sketch across collusion strategies

AIs are increasingly being deployed with greater autonomy and capabilities, which increases the risk that a misaligned AI may be able to cause catastrophic harm. Untrusted monitoring -- using one untrusted model to oversee another -- is one approach to reducing risk. Justifying the safety of an untrusted monitoring deployment is challenging because developers cannot safely deploy a misaligned model to test their protocol directly. In this paper, we develop upon existing methods for rigorously demonstrating safety based on pre-deployment testing. We relax assumptions that previous AI control research made about the collusion strategies a misaligned AI might use to subvert untrusted monitoring. We develop a taxonomy covering passive self-recognition, causal collusion (hiding pre-shared signals), acausal collusion (hiding signals via Schelling points), and combined strategies. We create a safety case sketch to clearly present our argument, explicitly state our assumptions, and highlight unsolved challenges. We identify conditions under which passive self-recognition could be a more effective collusion strategy than those studied previously. Our work builds towards more robust evaluations of untrusted monitoring.

cs.AI↗