Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2606.00868

On indecomposable elements in lattices

Abstract

We study the distribution of indecomposable elements in Euclidean lattices. A positive element in a lattice is called indecomposable if it cannot be represented as a sum of two other positive nonzero elements. The set of all indecomposables in a lattice forms the Hilbert basis for the positive lattice semigroup. We classify lattices that contain only finitely many indecomposables versus those that contain infinitely many. In the two-dimensional case, we prove that every positive element in a lattice can be represented as a positive integer linear combination of at most two indecomposables, which is a certain variation of the discrete Carathéodory's property. In the case of lattices coming from fractional ideals in real quadratic number fields, we obtain an explicit counting estimate for the number of indecomposables with bounded norm, showing logarithmic growth.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lenny Fukshansky, Filiana Kostopoulou. 2026-06-07. On indecomposable elements in lattices. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00868

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Asymptotic density of k-almost primes

Landau's well known asymptotic formula $$N_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : Ω(n)=k\}\mid \ \sim \left( \frac{x}{\log x} \right) \frac{(\log\log x)^{k-1}}{(k - 1)!}\ \ (x \rightarrow \infty),$$ which also holds for $$π_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : ω(n)=k\}\mid,$$ is known to be fairly poor for $k > 1$, and when $k$ is allowed to tend to infinity with $x$, the study of $N_k(x)$ and $π_k(x)$ becomes very technical [1, Chapter II.6, $§$ 6.1, p.200]. I hope to show that the method described below provides not only a more accurate approach, but rather increases in its asymptotic accuracy as $k$ tends to infinity.

math.NT

Real quadratic base changes for $\mathrm{GL}_3$ and integral periods relations

We prove a $p$-adic divisibility between the automorphic periods of a cuspidal automorphic representation of $\mathrm{GL}_3(\mathbb{Q})$ and the periods of its Arthur-Clozel's base change to some real quadratic field $E$. This generalizes earlier works of Tilouine-Urban and of Hida in the case of classical modular forms. The divisibility we prove involves a new kind of automorphic periods, defined using the middle degree of the cuspidal cohomology of $\mathrm{GL}_3(E)$, instead of the top or bottom degrees. We also investigate the Rogawski's stable base change from the quasi-split unitary group $U_E$ associated with $E$ to $\mathrm{GL}_3(E)$. In this situation, we also obtain some results toward a $p$-adic divisibility of automorphic periods.

math.NT