Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2606.01142

Repeated Descent: A Framework for Online Budget-Feasible Auctions

Abstract

We study budget feasible procurement auctions, in which $n$ agents, each with a privately held service cost, offer their services to an employer. The employer seeks to maximize a public submodular valuation function over the set of hired agents, while facing a hard budget constraint. We consider an online posted-price setting, in which agents arrive in a uniformly random order (a.k.a. \emph{secretary arrivals}) and the employer must make irrevocable take-it-or-leave-it offers upon their arrival. The employer does not get any feedback about the agent service costs other than whether they accept the offer or not. We introduce Repeated Descent (a.k.a. \RED), a deterministic framework based on adaptive linear posted pricing. \RED enforces budget feasibility by adaptively adjusting its pricing and balancing each pricing level with the number of agents considered in it. Using \RED as the main building block, we obtain a $1046$-competitive posted-price mechanism for online budget feasible auctions with secretary agent arrivals and submodular valuations, thus improving on the previously best known ratio of (Charalampopoulos et al., EC 2025) by several orders of magnitude. Combining \RED with random subsampling, we obtain the first constant-competitive posted-price budget feasible mechanism for non-monotone submodular valuations. On the negative side, we show that every online budget feasible mechanism with XOS valuations has a competitive ratio of $Ω\!\left(\tfrac{\log n}{(\log\log n)^2}\right)$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Andreas Charalampopoulos, Dimitris Fotakis, Thanos Tolias. 2026-05-31. Repeated Descent: A Framework for Online Budget-Feasible Auctions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.01142

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Learning in Structured Stackelberg Games

We initiate the study of structured Stackelberg games, a novel form of strategic interaction between a leader and a follower where contextual information can be predictive of the follower's (unknown) type. Motivated by applications such as security games and AI safety, we show how this additional structure can help the leader learn a utility-maximizing policy in both the online and distributional settings. In the online setting, we first prove that standard learning-theoretic measures of complexity do not characterize the difficulty of the leader's learning task. Notably, we find that there exists a learning-theoretic measure of complexity, analogous to the Littlestone dimension in online classification, that tightly characterizes the leader's instance-optimal regret. We term this the Stackelberg-Littlestone dimension, and leverage it to provide a provably optimal online learning algorithm. In the distributional setting, we provide analogous results by showing that two new dimensions control the sample complexity upper- and lower-bound.

cs.GT

Equilibrium and Infeasibility: A new solution concept for games

Addressing infeasibility in non-cooperative games has become an important topic, as many problems across different applications face this issue. In this paper, we propose a new solution concept for generalized games with possibly infeasible individual constraints. A solution is defined as the limit of a sequence of generalized Nash equilibria induced by games with penalty terms relaxing the individual constraints. Existence is established for a broad range of games and we provide conditions allowing to characterize a $ψ$-penalized solution as a strategy profile maximizing every player's utility over all her penalty minimizing strategies. A variation of Divide-the-Dollar serves as an illustrative example. We further establish the compatibility with the GNE and the solution to the Nash bargaining.

cs.GT

Subgame-Perfect Nash Equilibria of Plurality Voting with Abstention: a PSPACE-Completeness Result for Restricted Ballots

We consider sequential Plurality elections in which each voter may abstain or vote for a single candidate. Each voter assigns utilities to all candidates; for each voter, this induces a (weak) order over the candidates. Ties are resolved uniformly at random, and voting has a small positive cost, so that a voter prefers to abstain when their vote cannot change the election outcome. We consider a variant of this model where, for each voter, we additionally specify a prefix of her ranking, so that she is only allowed to vote for a candidate from that prefix (or abstain). We prove that for this variant of the model, deciding whether a designated candidate is among the election winners in a subgame-perfect equilibrium of the associated extensive-form game is PSPACE-complete. This partially resolves an open problem from the work of Desmedt and Elkind [2010].

cs.GT