Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2606.04359

Learning to cooperate with emergent reputation via multi-agent reinforcement learning

Abstract

Reputation, the aggregation of peer assessments diffused through social networks, is a pivotal mechanism for promoting cooperation in social dilemmas ubiquitous to distributed multi-agent systems comprising agents with limited perception and cognitive capabilities. Exploring efficient reputation systems, comprising reputation assessment rules and reputation-based policies, is a long-standing challenge. Previous work assumes predefined reputation assessment rules or models reputation as an intrinsic reward to learn policies, compromising the methods' ability for generalization and adaptation. To address this, we propose a distributed multi-agent reinforcement learning method $\textbf{COOPER}$ ($\textbf{COOP}$eration with $\textbf{E}$mergent $\textbf{R}$eputation), which jointly learns reputation assessment rules and reputation-based policies entirely from environment rewards. Notably, leveraging the underlying mechanisms of reputation, we deliberately design the constituent modules of $\textbf{COOPER}$ and the data flows among them, overcoming the latency and noise in the feedback signal, caused by the deep entanglement between reputation and policy. Experiments on the donation game and the coin game in grid world environments demonstrate that $\textbf{COOPER}$ effectively adapts to various existing reputation systems and co-players. Furthermore, we observe the co-emergence of reputation norms and cooperation in self-play settings. These results hold robustly across diverse social network topologies, underscoring the generalizability and efficacy of our approach.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Xinwei Song, Yizhe Huang, Dengji Zhao, Xue Feng. 2026-06-03. Learning to cooperate with emergent reputation via multi-agent reinforcement learning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04359

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Learning in Structured Stackelberg Games

We initiate the study of structured Stackelberg games, a novel form of strategic interaction between a leader and a follower where contextual information can be predictive of the follower's (unknown) type. Motivated by applications such as security games and AI safety, we show how this additional structure can help the leader learn a utility-maximizing policy in both the online and distributional settings. In the online setting, we first prove that standard learning-theoretic measures of complexity do not characterize the difficulty of the leader's learning task. Notably, we find that there exists a learning-theoretic measure of complexity, analogous to the Littlestone dimension in online classification, that tightly characterizes the leader's instance-optimal regret. We term this the Stackelberg-Littlestone dimension, and leverage it to provide a provably optimal online learning algorithm. In the distributional setting, we provide analogous results by showing that two new dimensions control the sample complexity upper- and lower-bound.

cs.GT

Equilibrium and Infeasibility: A new solution concept for games

Addressing infeasibility in non-cooperative games has become an important topic, as many problems across different applications face this issue. In this paper, we propose a new solution concept for generalized games with possibly infeasible individual constraints. A solution is defined as the limit of a sequence of generalized Nash equilibria induced by games with penalty terms relaxing the individual constraints. Existence is established for a broad range of games and we provide conditions allowing to characterize a $ψ$-penalized solution as a strategy profile maximizing every player's utility over all her penalty minimizing strategies. A variation of Divide-the-Dollar serves as an illustrative example. We further establish the compatibility with the GNE and the solution to the Nash bargaining.

cs.GT

Subgame-Perfect Nash Equilibria of Plurality Voting with Abstention: a PSPACE-Completeness Result for Restricted Ballots

We consider sequential Plurality elections in which each voter may abstain or vote for a single candidate. Each voter assigns utilities to all candidates; for each voter, this induces a (weak) order over the candidates. Ties are resolved uniformly at random, and voting has a small positive cost, so that a voter prefers to abstain when their vote cannot change the election outcome. We consider a variant of this model where, for each voter, we additionally specify a prefix of her ranking, so that she is only allowed to vote for a candidate from that prefix (or abstain). We prove that for this variant of the model, deciding whether a designated candidate is among the election winners in a subgame-perfect equilibrium of the associated extensive-form game is PSPACE-complete. This partially resolves an open problem from the work of Desmedt and Elkind [2010].

cs.GT