Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2606.12429

Muse Spark Safety & Preparedness Report

Cristina Menghini·Peter Ney·Hamza Kwisaba·Zifan·Wang·Miles Turpin·Felix Binder·Jean-Christophe Testud·Aidan Boyd·Nathaniel Li·Ivan Evtimov·Klaudia Krawiecka·Arman Zharmagambetov·Jeremy Kritz·Alexander R. Fabbri·Daniel Song·Jinpeng Miao·Joonas Hjelt·Meghna Ramani·Leona Lan·Reza Aghajani·Joanna Bitton·Mahesh Pasupuleti·Devin Norder·Khalid El-Arini·Paridhi Singh·Vítor Albiero·Sahana CB·Rashnil Chaturvedi·Elahe Dabir·Edoardo Debenedetti·Jim Gust·Ziwen Han·Kat He·Sean Hendryx·Lifeng Jin·Polina Kirichenko·Sandra Lefdal·Kenneth Li·Asad Liaqat·Inna Lin·Despoina Magka·Neal Mangaokar·Ishita Mediratta·Zach Miller·Smitha Milli·Niloofar Mireshghallah·Saba Nazir·Hung Nguyen·Maximilian Nickel·Kelvin Niu·Kerem Oktar·Bhargavi Paranjape·Parth Pathak·Maya Pavlova·Emmanuel Ramirez·David Renardy·Candace Ross·Yasha Sheynin·Claudia Shi·Shivam Singhal·Evangelia Spiliopoulou·Rakshith Sharma Srinivasa·Jamelle Watson-Daniels·Spencer Whitman·Adina Williams·Chen Xing·Andy Zou·Tommy Ma·Siqi Deng·James Beldock·Prashant Ratanchandani·Kate Plawiak·Taesung Lee·Ryan Victory·Lindsay Hundley·Rachad Alao·Himaghna Bhattacharjee·Jianfeng Chi·Gary Frost·Pegah Ghahremani·Niki Howe·Yuheng Huang·Saeed Jahed·Hannah Korevaar·Trang Le·Zhe Liu·Jinghong Luo·Qin Lyu·Nina Mehrabi·Abraham Montilla·Chirag Nagpal·Cyrus Nikolaidis·Rajvardhan Oak·Manoj Ravi·Vidya Sarma·Aman Shankar·Alana Shine·Eric Michael Smith·Mariana Tandon
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Muse Spark is the latest large language model developed by Meta. In this report, we first present evaluations for catastrophic risk domains under Meta's Advanced AI Scaling Framework, along with the evidence that informed our launch decision. We then discuss additional considerations, such as Muse Spark's broader content safety and behavioral profile, that are relevant to overall safety but fall outside the catastrophic risk domains governed by the Framework. Our preparedness results covering Chemical and Biological, Cybersecurity, and Loss of Control risks assess Muse Spark's deployment within Meta AI as presenting acceptable levels of residual risks under our Advanced AI Scaling Framework. We conducted a broad set of evaluations targeting dual-use and high-risk capabilities across these catastrophic risk domains. Those evaluations identified elevated risks prior to mitigations, with Chemical and Biological capabilities assessed as likely reaching the "high risk" category under the Advanced AI Scaling Framework before safeguards were applied. We have implemented a multi-layered set of mitigations that address the identified risks, and Muse Spark demonstrates state-of-the-art refusal across a range of benchmarks related to hazardous workflows in chemistry and biology. We therefore release Muse Spark as the underlying model of Meta AI.

Explore related subjects

cs.CYcs.AI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Cristina Menghini, Peter Ney, Hamza Kwisaba, Zifan, Wang, Miles Turpin, Felix Binder, Jean-Christophe Testud, Aidan Boyd, Nathaniel Li, Ivan Evtimov, Klaudia Krawiecka, Arman Zharmagambetov, Jeremy Kritz, Alexander R. Fabbri, Daniel Song, Jinpeng Miao, Joonas Hjelt, Meghna Ramani, Leona Lan, Reza Aghajani, Joanna Bitton, Mahesh Pasupuleti, Devin Norder, Khalid El-Arini, Paridhi Singh, Vítor Albiero, Sahana CB, Rashnil Chaturvedi, Elahe Dabir, Edoardo Debenedetti, Jim Gust, Ziwen Han, Kat He, Sean Hendryx, Lifeng Jin, Polina Kirichenko, Sandra Lefdal, Kenneth Li, Asad Liaqat, Inna Lin, Despoina Magka, Neal Mangaokar, Ishita Mediratta, Zach Miller, Smitha Milli, Niloofar Mireshghallah, Saba Nazir, Hung Nguyen, Maximilian Nickel, Kelvin Niu, Kerem Oktar, Bhargavi Paranjape, Parth Pathak, Maya Pavlova, Emmanuel Ramirez, David Renardy, Candace Ross, Yasha Sheynin, Claudia Shi, Shivam Singhal, Evangelia Spiliopoulou, Rakshith Sharma Srinivasa, Jamelle Watson-Daniels, Spencer Whitman, Adina Williams, Chen Xing, Andy Zou, Tommy Ma, Siqi Deng, James Beldock, Prashant Ratanchandani, Kate Plawiak, Taesung Lee, Ryan Victory, Lindsay Hundley, Rachad Alao, Himaghna Bhattacharjee, Jianfeng Chi, Gary Frost, Pegah Ghahremani, Niki Howe, Yuheng Huang, Saeed Jahed, Hannah Korevaar, Trang Le, Zhe Liu, Jinghong Luo, Qin Lyu, Nina Mehrabi, Abraham Montilla, Chirag Nagpal, Cyrus Nikolaidis, Rajvardhan Oak, Manoj Ravi, Vidya Sarma, Aman Shankar, Alana Shine, Eric Michael Smith, Mariana Tandon. 2026-05-14. Muse Spark Safety & Preparedness Report. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12429

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

A Brief AI Literacy Intervention Does Not Significantly Reduce Over-Reliance and Increases Under-Reliance on ChatGPT: A Randomized Study

In this study, we examined whether a brief AI literacy intervention influences high school students' reliance on recommendations from large language models (LLMs). In a randomized experiment, students were assigned to either a control group receiving a brief introduction to LLMs or an intervention group receiving additional information about how LLMs work, their limitations, and effective usage strategies. Participants then solved eight math puzzles with ChatGPT's advice, which was incorrect in half of the trials. Results indicated widespread over-reliance, with incorrect recommendations adopted in 52.1% of the trials. The intervention did not significantly reduce over-reliance. Instead, it led to an increase in under-reliance, as students were more likely to reject correct recommendations. These findings provide preliminary evidence that brief text-based interventions may be ineffective in fostering appropriate reliance. More comprehensive and interactive approaches may be required to meaningfully influence students' real-world reliance on LLMs.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

Your Programming Students' Cognition with ChatGPT: Higher Performance, Lower Retention, and Reduced Ownership

Generative AI can improve students' programming performance, but successful task completion may not reflect what they retain. We examined performance, retention, cognitive load, and ownership in a controlled between-subjects experiment with 59 undergraduate computer science students, 55 were retained for analysis. Participants completed three introductory C programming tasks with access to ChatGPT-4.5 or conventional web search without generative AI. We measured task performance, self-reported mental effort and difficulty, pupillary responses, heart rate variability, and ownership, and assessed cued recall immediately and 48 hours later. ChatGPT-assisted students achieved higher coding scores (89% vs. 69%) but lower recall scores immediately (41% vs. 53%) and after 48 hours (39% vs. 52%). There was no significant difference in the loss of recall information over 48 hours between the groups. Self-reported mental effort increased less across tasks in the ChatGPT condition (Holm-adjusted p = .047), and students attributed less of the submitted code to themselves (45% vs. 81%). Confirmatory physiological tests did not detect significant differences in trajectories between conditions; substantial data loss limits their interpretation. These findings reveal a gap between assisted task performance and subsequent recall and sense of ownership in this setting. They motivate the need for assessment practices and AI learning tools that require students to explain, retrieve, and contribute to the work they submit as active participants in their education.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

Open Platform Field Experiments: Expanding the Design Space of Experimental Research on Social Media

Despite a growing demand for causal evidence about social media, independent researchers remain severely constrained in their ability to conduct experiments directly on online platforms. To cope, multiple methodological workarounds have emerged - from controlled surveys and simulations to client-side overlays and platform partnerships - each requiring distinct trade-offs between desirable experimental properties. The recent emergence of open social media platforms offers a qualitatively different methodological opportunity. Here we propose a design space of social media experimentation and discuss Open Platform Field Experiments (OPFEs). OPFEs represent a distinct class of experimental approaches that enable independent researchers to directly intervene on functional platform components - such as clients, recommendation systems, and moderation services - within live social media environments. Through a comparative analysis of experimental archetypes, we show that OPFEs occupy a previously unexplored region of the design space. We then bridge theory and practice by characterizing the architectural and governance elements that enable OPFEs, mapping them onto Bluesky and the AT Protocol, and illustrating the end-to-end lifecycle of a complete OPFE design. Overall, this work establishes OPFEs as a practical methodological paradigm for independent, transparent, and ecologically grounded experimentation on open social media.

cs.CY↗