Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2606.26074

Strategyproof Facility Location and Committee Selection with Mixed Max and Sum Agent Types

Abstract

We study strategic facility location, in which $n$ agents are located in an arbitrary metric space, and the goal is to choose $k$ facilities to minimize the total agent cost. The agents can have two types of individual cost functions: max-type where the agent wants to minimize the maximum distance from themselves to any chosen facility, or sum-type where the agent wants to minimize the average distance to the chosen facilities. The agents are self-interested, however, and both the agent location and the agent type may be private information. We provide deterministic strategyproof mechanisms for this setting, and prove bounds on their approximation ratio as compared with the solution minimizing the total agent cost. When agent types are private but their locations are known, we prove that an approximation of $\left(3 -\frac{2}{k}\right)$ is always possible, and a better approximation of $\left(\frac{2}{1-k+\sqrt{k^2-k+1}}-1\right)$ is achievable when we know the {\em fraction} of the agents with each type, but not necessarily the type of each individual agent. These bounds hold for arbitrary $k$ and arbitrary metric distances. When agent locations are private, we instead focus on the line metric, and show that a simple generalization of the median mechanism results in an approximation ratio of 3, even for large $k$ and arbitrary mixes of agent types. Our results show the importance of collecting information about agent types vs about their locations, and show that it is possible to produce good outcomes even without such information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yue Gruszecki, Elliot Anshelevich. 2026-06-24. Strategyproof Facility Location and Committee Selection with Mixed Max and Sum Agent Types. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.26074

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Learning in Structured Stackelberg Games

We initiate the study of structured Stackelberg games, a novel form of strategic interaction between a leader and a follower where contextual information can be predictive of the follower's (unknown) type. Motivated by applications such as security games and AI safety, we show how this additional structure can help the leader learn a utility-maximizing policy in both the online and distributional settings. In the online setting, we first prove that standard learning-theoretic measures of complexity do not characterize the difficulty of the leader's learning task. Notably, we find that there exists a learning-theoretic measure of complexity, analogous to the Littlestone dimension in online classification, that tightly characterizes the leader's instance-optimal regret. We term this the Stackelberg-Littlestone dimension, and leverage it to provide a provably optimal online learning algorithm. In the distributional setting, we provide analogous results by showing that two new dimensions control the sample complexity upper- and lower-bound.

cs.GT

Equilibrium and Infeasibility: A new solution concept for games

Addressing infeasibility in non-cooperative games has become an important topic, as many problems across different applications face this issue. In this paper, we propose a new solution concept for generalized games with possibly infeasible individual constraints. A solution is defined as the limit of a sequence of generalized Nash equilibria induced by games with penalty terms relaxing the individual constraints. Existence is established for a broad range of games and we provide conditions allowing to characterize a $ψ$-penalized solution as a strategy profile maximizing every player's utility over all her penalty minimizing strategies. A variation of Divide-the-Dollar serves as an illustrative example. We further establish the compatibility with the GNE and the solution to the Nash bargaining.

cs.GT

Subgame-Perfect Nash Equilibria of Plurality Voting with Abstention: a PSPACE-Completeness Result for Restricted Ballots

We consider sequential Plurality elections in which each voter may abstain or vote for a single candidate. Each voter assigns utilities to all candidates; for each voter, this induces a (weak) order over the candidates. Ties are resolved uniformly at random, and voting has a small positive cost, so that a voter prefers to abstain when their vote cannot change the election outcome. We consider a variant of this model where, for each voter, we additionally specify a prefix of her ranking, so that she is only allowed to vote for a candidate from that prefix (or abstain). We prove that for this variant of the model, deciding whether a designated candidate is among the election winners in a subgame-perfect equilibrium of the associated extensive-form game is PSPACE-complete. This partially resolves an open problem from the work of Desmedt and Elkind [2010].

cs.GT