Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2607.00292

An LLM-Based Framework for Intent-Driven Network Topology Design

Kholoud El-Habbouli·Fen Zhou·Stephane Huet
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Designing deployable and resilient network topologies from natural language requirements remains a challenging problem in network automation. This work investigates the ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate structurally valid and constraint-compliant network topologies through a constraint-driven pipeline combining hierarchical modeling and systematic validation. The framework is evaluated via a multimodel comparison of proprietary and open-weight LLMs across four realistic network scenarios released as a public dataset. We assess structural correctness using node and edge F1-scores against reference topologies, and evaluate resilience through server and content connectivity metrics. In addition, we analyze common failure modes, including interface mismatches and directional inconsistencies in generated topologies. Overall, this work provides a systematic benchmark for understanding how LLMs handle structural and resilience constraints in topology synthesis, and supports informed model selection for AI-driven network design.

Explore related subjects

cs.NIcs.AIcs.CL

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Kholoud El-Habbouli, Fen Zhou, Stephane Huet. 2026-08-27. An LLM-Based Framework for Intent-Driven Network Topology Design. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.00292

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.AI subjectcs.CL subjectcs.NI subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Intelligent Identification and Repair of Design Defects in BIM via Domain-Specific Large Language Models

Existing methods lack a generalized approach to efficiently identify and resolve the diversity of design defects in BIM. Therefore, this study proposes an integrated framework to identify and repair various defects in BIM via domain-specific LLMs. Firstly, a BIM-to-Text method with component-balanced chunking is introduced to bridge BIM data with LLMs. Then, prompt learning with rule injection, few-shot prompting and RAG is proposed to identify defects and generate repair suggestions. Meanwhile, a hallucination control strategy combining key identifier validation and token-length thresholds is introduced to ensure reliability. Experiments show capability expansion yields 85% identification accuracy versus 70% for traditional rule checking, achieving a 94% rate of reasonable repair suggestions. Moreover, the proposed hallucination control further increased accuracy from 64% to 85%, eliminating 92.5% of hallucinations in a single intervention round. This study establishes an end-to-end prototype from raw BIM data input, through defect identification, to repair suggestion generation.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

How Identity and Opinion Shape Political Sycophancy in LLMs

As Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly encourage users to disclose personal profiles for tailored assistance, measuring their political alignment becomes increasingly important. However, many existing benchmarks for assessing political behavior rely on closed-ended questions and do not fully capture how a model's stance may adapt to user-provided context during interaction. We introduce a framework that disentangles two distinct triggers of political sycophancy: opinion (aligning with explicit narratives) and identity (stereotyping based on demographic labels). Using 450 manually-checked political dilemmas as controlled probes, we evaluate 13 instruction-tuned LLMs. We uncover a dissociation: a model's susceptibility to explicit opinions does not necessarily predict its susceptibility to identity cues, and vice versa. When both signals are present, their effects are generally sub-additive rather than simply additive. Additionally, system-level personas primarily shift a model's baseline stance while having limited effect on the stance shift caused by user opinion or identity. Ultimately, our results suggest that LLM political stance is interactively and steerably vulnerable rather than being a fixed trait, highlighting how personalization may amplify identity- or opinion-conditioned shifts in the model's behaviors.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

How Order-Sensitive Are LLMs? OrderProbe for Deterministic Structural Reconstruction

Large language models (LLMs) excel at semantic understanding, yet their ability to reconstruct internal structure from scrambled inputs remains underexplored. Sentence-level restoration is difficult to evaluate automatically because scrambled sentences often admit multiple valid reorderings. We introduce OrderProbe, a deterministic benchmark for structural reconstruction using fixed four-character expressions in Chinese, Japanese, and Korean, which have a unique canonical order and thus support exact-match scoring. We further propose a diagnostic framework that evaluates models beyond recovery accuracy, including Semantic Accuracy, Logical Validity, Structural Consistency, Robustness, and Information Density. Experiments on twelve widely used LLMs show that structural reconstruction remains difficult even for frontier systems: zero-shot recovery frequently falls below 35%. We also observe a consistent gap between meaning-oriented generation and exact structural reconstruction, suggesting that structural robustness is not an automatic byproduct of semantic competence.

cs.CL↗