Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2607.04346

Preference-fitting Framework: Elicited Utility Function and PHARA Approximation

Abstract

The utility function plays a core role in portfolio selection, but its specific form is typically hard to elicit. We propose a definition of the elicited utility function and develop a preference-fitting method to obtain it. Basically, we use intuitive probability-wealth pairs to derive a fitted terminal wealth, a fitted portfolio and a fitted utility function, which converge to the optimal terminal wealth, the optimal portfolio and the elicited utility function of the investor, respectively. Specifically, we first establish a bijection between the utility functions and the terminal wealth functions, based on which we construct the fitted terminal wealth, and then obtain the fitted portfolio and the fitted utility function through the martingale-duality method. Next, we develop a piecewise hyperbolic absolute risk aversion (abbr. PHARA) utility approximation method, and verify the convergences in various senses: almost surely, $L^r$, uniform, etc. We demonstrate two applications of our method: obtaining asymptotically explicit portfolios and handling portfolio selection under Value-at-Risk (abbr. VaR) constraints, thereby illustrating its advantages including intuitiveness, analytical tractability, and ability to circumvent the Lagrange multiplier.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Rui Dai, Zongxia Liang, Yang Liu. 2026-07-05. Preference-fitting Framework: Elicited Utility Function and PHARA Approximation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.04346

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Financially Guided Deep Portfolio Optimization

Portfolio optimization in real-world financial markets is notoriously difficult due to non-stationarity, noisy data, and high transaction costs. Standard predict-then-optimize methods first forecast returns and then solve for weights, compounding prediction errors and often failing under regime shifts. We propose an end-to-end framework that directly optimizes differentiable surrogates of key financial metrics (Sharpe ratio, Omega ratio, Conditional Value-at-Risk, and risk parity), allowing neural networks to learn portfolio weights via backpropagation. Our expanding-window walk-forward procedure, applied to 50 S&P 500 stocks from 2007 to 2023, incorporates realistic bid-ask spread costs and rebalances quarterly. On the challenging out-of-sample test period (2022-2023), the best model, an AttentionLSTM with the Omega-CVaR-RiskParity loss, achieves an annualized Sharpe of 0.29 and a total compounded return of +7.86%, while the S&P 500 delivers -4.52% total compounded return and an annualized Sharpe of -0.02. This outperforms the S&P 500 by 12.38 percentage points, while keeping tail risk (CVaR) nearly unchanged. The framework outperforms the equal-weight portfolio, S&P 500, and traditional methods (MVP, HRP, NCO, ERC), demonstrating that embedding financial objectives directly into model training yields robust, economically meaningful outperformance even in adverse market conditions.

q-fin.PM

The geometry of higher order modern portfolio theory

In this article, we study the generalized modern portfolio theory, with utility functions admitting higher-order cumulants. We establish that under certain genericity conditions, the utility function has a constant number of complex critical points. We study the discriminant locus of complex critical points with multiplicity. Finally, we switch our attention to the generalization of the feasible portfolio set (variety), determine its dimension, and give a formula for its degree.

q-fin.PM

Special Markowitz: Thermodynamic Formalism for the Joint Regularisation of Returns and Covariance

Special Markowitz (SM) regularises returns and covariance jointly, relative to a reference state (mu_ref, Sigma_ref). Each eigendirection of the whitened relative operator carries a signed spectral potential Phi_k, with persistence factor psi_k = exp(-Phi_k) > 0. Positive potentials attenuate empirical deviations from the reference geometry, zero potential preserves them, and negative potentials amplify them. The persistence factor psi_k governs both the return signal and the covariance deviation: the regularised deviation from the reference is psi_k times the empirical deviation. The logarithmic potential coordinate is characterised by a multiplicative composition law on the multiplicative group of positive real numbers; the Stein loss is characterised as the unique free-energy density (within a natural class) compatible with the resulting coupling. The SM pressure functional is additive across modes the defining property of Special Markowitz.

q-fin.PM