Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2607.13718

How Agents Ask for Permission: User Permissions for AI Agents, from Interfaces to Enforcement

Alexandra E. Michael·Franziska Roesner
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

As AI agents gain prevalence, users are increasingly exposed to the risks such systems entail. Prompt injection attacks, as well as hallucination, can cause agents to leak private information to third parties. As autonomous systems, agents also present the more active danger of performing sensitive tasks, such as bank transactions, without the user's intent or authorization. Recognizing this challenge, the agentic security community has developed numerous proposals for secure agentic systems. Much of this work has focused on product-level approaches, where agentic system developers determine and apply the same security policies and permissions to all users. Yet different users have different needs and preferences, necessitating support for user-level permissions policies in agentic AI systems. To understand how user-level permissions are handled in AI agent systems, we survey 21 proposals for agent permissions systems. From this review, we construct a taxonomy of how different systems specify user-level permissions policies, both at the user interface and internally; derive internal policies from user input; and enforce those policies at run-time. We then analyze five prominent commercial agents and compare their permissions handling to agentic permissions systems in the literature. We identify several high-level themes across the literature and commercial agents, as well as multiple gaps where future work is needed.

Explore related subjects

cs.CRcs.AI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Alexandra E. Michael, Franziska Roesner. 2026-07-20. How Agents Ask for Permission: User Permissions for AI Agents, from Interfaces to Enforcement. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.13718

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

The shifted-prime Erdős-Wintner law for primitive-root determinant densities: extremal order, dimension zero, and Fourier decay

For a prime $p$, let $c(p)=\frac{φ(p-1)}{p-1}\prod_{j\ge1}(1-p^{-j})$, the limiting density of matrices over $\mathbb F_p$ with primitive-root determinant. Its limiting law over the primes is the classical continuous shifted-totient law on $[0,1/2]$. We prove Hausdorff dimension zero and vanishing lower and upper dyadic $L^q$ dimensions for $q>1$. Its image $μ_f$ under $x\mapsto-\log x$ is Rajchman. As $T\to\infty$, for $U_T$ uniform on $[0,T]$, $\log|\widehat{μ_f}(U_T)|/\log\log T\to-1$ in probability. For every $A>0$, $|\widehat{μ_f}(τ)|\le(\log\log T)^4/\log T$ outside a subset of $[0,T]$ of relative measure $O_A((\log T)^{-A})$. As $h\downarrow0$, $\sup_aμ_f([a,a+h])=\mathfrak S_2e^{-γ}/\log(1/h)+O(\log^{-2}(1/h))$, where $\mathfrak S_2$ is the twin-prime singular series; maximizing left endpoints lie within $h$ of $\log3$ for small $h$. We prove $\min_{p\le x}c(p)\sim e^{-γ}/\log\log x$ and $\limsup_{p\to\infty}(c(p)\log\log p)^{-1}=e^γ$. The limiting law of $\log(φ(p+1)/φ(p-1))$ has support $\mathbb R$ and Hausdorff dimension zero. For the classical law of $σ(p-1)/(p-1)$ on $[3/2,\infty)$, we prove dimension zero, a sharp left-endpoint asymptotic, and a Rajchman logarithmic image. Its odd-prime component has an entire Mellin transform of order one. Partial-factorization bounds yield certified asymptotic searches for fully splitting negacyclic number-theoretic transform primes with prescribed reciprocal-density bounds at fixed power-of-two length. We determine the second distinct squared norm of $A_{n_1}\otimes\cdots\otimes A_{n_k}$ for $k,n_i\ge2$, yielding exact cyclotomic codifferent shell gaps and a uniform smoothing asymptotic at $ε=2^{-cφ(m)}$ for $c>2\log_2(1+\sqrt6)$. These results are unconditional. An explicit unproved exponent-pair hypothesis yields $|\widehat{μ_f}(τ)|=O(1/\log\log|τ|)$.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

Studying Detection Rule Generation as a Unified Task

Security systems use detection rules to identify suspicious activity. Existing studies often investigate rule generation for specific security systems, devoting substantial effort to developing dedicated methods and evaluation setups. Such customization contributes to fragmented research, limiting method reuse and result comparability across systems. We therefore study detection rule generation as a unified task across diverse natural language inputs and rule languages. To support method reuse, we propose UniRule, which abstracts diverse rules into shared natural language representations for retrieval. To enable consistent evaluation, we introduce a protocol that compares rules under shared criteria and aggregates the results into method scores. Experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of UniRule and the reliability of the evaluation protocol. They also show that method performance in one setting can be predicted from results in others, with average error close to that obtained using that setting's own data. These findings support studying detection rule generation as a unified task.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

Analyzing Defensive Misdirection Against Model-Guided Automated Attacks on Agentic AI Systems

Agentic AI systems increasingly rely on language-model components to interpret instructions, process external data, invoke tools, and coordinate with other agents. These capabilities make prompt-injection and jailbreak attacks more consequential, especially as attackers adopt model-guided automation to scale probing, prompt refinement, and response evaluation. This work analyzes the resulting attack-defense setting through a probabilistic model of a target system, its defense mechanism, and the attacker's automated judge. Our analysis shows that conventional detect-and-block defenses can allow attacker success rate (ASR) to approach one as the query budget grows, since predictable refusals provide useful feedback to automated search. We then examine detect-and-misdirect, where detected malicious interactions receive controlled, non-operational responses designed to induce false-positive errors in the attacker's judge. This strategy reduces the positive predictive value of attacker-selected candidates and yields a bounded asymptotic ASR. We evaluate a proof-of-concept realization of this strategy through Contextual Misdirection via Progressive Engagement (CMPE), a lightweight conversational misdirection method designed to replace predictable refusal text with safe but strategically misleading responses in automated jailbreak settings. On jailbreak benchmarks, CMPE reduces estimated ASR upper bounds by up to two orders of magnitude and nearly eliminates verified attack success in end-to-end experiments with PAIR, GPTFuzz, and AutoDAN-Turbo.

cs.CR↗