Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2607.21626

Discrete Action Space as a Prerequisite for GRPO Convergence in Small-Model Continuous Control

Dmytro Filatov·Valentyn Fedorov·Vira Filatova
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study whether Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) can fine-tune small language models for simulated quadrotor continuous-control tasks. In our benchmark, vanilla GRPO fine-tuning of Qwen-0.5B for 25 Hz quadrotor velocity control collapses to the trivial zero action: 0 percent success rate, with entropy falling from 0.35 to 0.03 within 60 steps. Two ablations - removing the jerk-penalty term and removing the KL anchor to the pretrained prior - each prevent entropy collapse, yet neither enables learning. When the action interface is replaced by a 5-way categorical choice over PID presets, training converges. The resulting controller traces a smoothness-reliability Pareto frontier along training duration; both endpoints are reported: 98.6 percent success with 0.656 m/s3 jerk at 64 steps, and 100 percent success with 1.103 m/s3 jerk, or 0.796 under a matched velocity cap, at 256 steps. The recipe is evaluated across three pretrained language models. As context, a re-tuned classical baseline, PID with Ki = 0.30 and vmax = 2.5, reaches the same 100 percent success rate at jerk 0.736 m/s3. A high-fidelity simulation using Crazyflie 2.1 dynamics surfaces a hover-region training-distribution gap.

Explore related subjects

cs.AI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Dmytro Filatov, Valentyn Fedorov, Vira Filatova. 2026-07-07. Discrete Action Space as a Prerequisite for GRPO Convergence in Small-Model Continuous Control. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.21626

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Memory-Free Continual Learning with Null Space Adaptation for Zero-Shot Vision-Language Models

Pre-trained vision-language models (VLMs), such as CLIP, have demonstrated remarkable zero-shot generalization, enabling deployment in a wide range of real-world tasks without additional task-specific training. However, in real deployment scenarios with evolving environments or emerging classes, these models inevitably face distributional shifts and novel tasks. In such contexts, static zero-shot capabilities are insufficient, and there is a growing need for continual learning methods that allow models to adapt over time while avoiding catastrophic forgetting. We introduce NuSA-CL (Null Space Adaptation for Continual Learning), a lightweight memory-free continual learning framework designed to address this challenge. NuSA-CL employs low-rank adaptation and constrains task-specific weight updates to lie within an approximate null space of the model's current parameters. This strategy minimizes interference with previously acquired knowledge, effectively preserving the zero-shot capabilities of the original model. Unlike methods relying on replay buffers or costly distillation, NuSA-CL imposes minimal computational and memory overhead, making it practical for deployment in resource-constrained, real-world continual learning environments. Experiments show that our framework not only effectively preserves zero-shot transfer capabilities but also achieves highly competitive performance on continual learning benchmarks. These results position NuSA-CL as a practical and scalable solution for continually evolving zero-shot VLMs in real-world applications.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

VeRA: Renewing Reasoning Benchmarks with Executable Specifications

Reasoning benchmarks need renewal along two axes: freshness and headroom. VeRA makes both executable and auditable by turning each item into a task family: a natural-language template, an input generator, and a deterministic answer program. VeRA-E draws fresh instances within a family; VeRA-H modifies the family toward harder tasks; and VeRA-H Pro selects one judge-ranked candidate from up to five validated proposals per seed. Execution checks, seed anchoring, answer discrimination, and independent human solving validate specifications and items. Accepted programs generate further labeled instances through local computation. Across 16 models, AIME-2024 accuracy decreases from 84.46% on seeds to 70.25% on VeRA-E variants, exposing a gap between fixed-item success and fresh-instance robustness. On AIME-2024-II, the human-audited VeRA-H Pro release lowers accuracy from 84.91% to 58.57%. Across the three hardening sources, H Pro has lower mean accuracy than H. On AMO-Bench, both releases average higher accuracy than the seeds under the evaluated budget. Initial auditing accepts 75.4% of hardened candidates; targeted repair raises usable yield to 95.1%. Executable families thus support repeatable benchmark renewal, with validation improving task quality and selection shaping the delivered challenge.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

When can we trust untrusted monitoring? A safety case sketch across collusion strategies

AIs are increasingly being deployed with greater autonomy and capabilities, which increases the risk that a misaligned AI may be able to cause catastrophic harm. Untrusted monitoring -- using one untrusted model to oversee another -- is one approach to reducing risk. Justifying the safety of an untrusted monitoring deployment is challenging because developers cannot safely deploy a misaligned model to test their protocol directly. In this paper, we develop upon existing methods for rigorously demonstrating safety based on pre-deployment testing. We relax assumptions that previous AI control research made about the collusion strategies a misaligned AI might use to subvert untrusted monitoring. We develop a taxonomy covering passive self-recognition, causal collusion (hiding pre-shared signals), acausal collusion (hiding signals via Schelling points), and combined strategies. We create a safety case sketch to clearly present our argument, explicitly state our assumptions, and highlight unsolved challenges. We identify conditions under which passive self-recognition could be a more effective collusion strategy than those studied previously. Our work builds towards more robust evaluations of untrusted monitoring.

cs.AI↗