Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2607.27505

Single-Network Finite-Sample Inference in Strategic Network Formation Models

Abstract

We develop a finite-sample valid inference procedure for strategic network formation models in which linking decisions depend on endogenous network statistics (say, the number of common friends). Only a single network is required to be observed, and we restrict neither its density, nor the dependence structure induced by strategic interaction, nor the equilibrium selection mechanism. We exploit a bounding-by-c technique to construct a set of sandwich inequalities that are valid realization by realization, with the middle term involving only the i.i.d. pairwise error. We then average the sandwich inequalities over cells of exogenous covariates, and obtain identifying restrictions under a nonstandard pathwise limit formulation. For inference, we construct test statistics whose finite-sample uncertainty can be controlled by statistics of the exogenous covariates and errors alone, whose conditional distributions are exactly simulable in both semiparametric and parametric settings. Our proposed inference procedure is also computationally tractable, with no need to solve, simulate, or enumerate equilibrium network structures. In simulations, our procedure easily scales to networks of size 10,000, and yields confidence sets that certifies the sign of the strategic coefficient. In two empirical applications (with network size about 300~9500), we find statistical evidence for positive link interdependence at 95% confidence level.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Wayne Yuan Gao, Ming Li. 2026-07-29. Single-Network Finite-Sample Inference in Strategic Network Formation Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.27505

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Evidence Aggregation for Treatment Choice

Consider a planner who has limited knowledge of the policy's causal impact on a certain local population of interest due to a lack of data, but does have access to the publicized intervention studies performed for similar policies on different populations. How should the planner make use of and aggregate this existing evidence to make her policy decision? Following Manski (2020; Towards Credible Patient-Centered Meta-Analysis, \textit{Epidemiology}), we formulate the planner's problem as a statistical decision problem with a social welfare objective, and solve for an optimal aggregation rule under the minimax-regret criterion. We investigate the analytical properties, computational feasibility, and welfare regret performance of this rule. We apply the minimax regret decision rule to decide whether to enact an active labor market policy based on 14 randomized control trial studies.

econ.EM

Beta-Sorted Portfolios

Beta-sorted portfolios---portfolios comprised of assets with similar covariation with selected risk factors---are a popular tool in empirical finance to analyze models of (conditional) expected returns. Despite their widespread use, little is known of their econometric properties in contrast to comparable procedures such as two-pass regressions. We formally investigate the properties of beta-sorted portfolio returns by casting the procedure as a two-step nonparametric estimator with a nonparametric first step and a beta-adaptive portfolio construction. Our framework rationalizes the well-known estimation algorithm with precise economic and statistical assumptions on the general data-generating process. We provide conditions which ensure valid estimation and inference allowing for a range of hypotheses of interest in financial applications. We show that the rate of convergence of the estimator changes depending on the value of beta. We demonstrate that valid inference depends critically on the object of interest and discuss drawbacks of the widely used Fama-MacBeth variance estimator. To address these limitations, we propose a new variance estimator. We demonstrate the usefulness of our theoretical results in two empirical applications, including one in which we introduce a novel risk factor that captures the business credit cycle and show that it predicts both the cross-sectional and time-series behavior of U.S. stock returns.

econ.EM

Difference-in-Differences with Unpoolable Data

Difference-in-differences (DID) is commonly used to estimate treatment effects but is infeasible in settings where data are unpoolable due to privacy concerns or legal restrictions on data sharing, particularly across jurisdictions. In this study, we identify and relax the assumption of data poolability in DID estimation. We propose an innovative approach to estimate DID with unpoolable data (UN-DID) which can accommodate covariates, multiple groups, and staggered adoption. Through analytical proofs and Monte Carlo simulations, we show that UN-DID and conventional DID estimates of the average treatment effect and standard errors are equal and unbiased in settings without covariates. With covariates, both methods produce estimates that are unbiased, equivalent, and converge to the true value. The estimates differ slightly but the statistical inference and substantive conclusions remain the same. Two empirical examples with real-world data further underscore UN-DID's utility. The UN-DID method allows the estimation of cross-jurisdictional treatment effects with unpoolable data, enabling better counterfactuals to be used and new research questions to be answered.

econ.EM