Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2607.27541

From Grothendieck cofibrations to factorization systems: a formal 2-monadic account

Abstract

Grothendieck cofibrations describe transport in a category varying over a base, while factorization systems organize the arrows of a category into two complementary classes. We give a fully 2-categorical account of the passage from the former structure to the latter. The global comma 2-monad on the arrow 2-category encodes Grothendieck transport, whereas the squaring 2-monad encodes factorizations. We prove that split cofibrations are precisely the strict algebras for the comma 2-monad, including their 1-cells and 2-cells, and that normally cloven cofibrations are precisely its normal pseudoalgebras. A canonical colax morphism from the comma 2-monad to the squaring 2-monad then turns cocartesian transport into the cocartesian-vertical factorization of arrows in the total category. At the strict level, this yields the strict factorization system of designated cocartesian and vertical arrows; at the coherent level, it yields the orthogonal factorization system whose left class consists of all cocartesian arrows and whose right class consists of the arrows sent to isomorphisms in the base. We also separate unrestricted global pseudoalgebras, which retain a coherently trivial base action, from fixed-base pseudoalgebras, which correspond to arbitrary cleavages, and record the dual strict result for fibrations. This places the classical cofibration-factorization interaction, in all these variants, within a single change-of-2-monads construction and relates it directly to the existing fibrational and factorization literature.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Fernando Lucatelli Nunes, Walter Tholen. 2026-07-30. From Grothendieck cofibrations to factorization systems: a formal 2-monadic account. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.27541

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A Categorical Generalization of Counterpoint

We extend Mazzola's counterpoint model using category theory, generalizing from the category $\mathbf{Set}$ to an arbitrary topos other than $\mathbf{Set}$. This generalization suggests that counterpoint's essential structure depends on specific categorical conditions rather than classical set-theoretic reasoning. A key contribution is identifying sufficient requirements for a well-behaved counterpoint theory in a topos: some version of Zorn's Lemma (GJZL), and two-valuedness and split supports (NS). Within a topos, we introduce (weak) quasidichotomies alongside the classical notion of dichotomy. These structures capture varying degrees of oppositional structure between consonance and dissonance, with weak quasidichotomies preserving the non-Boolean flexibility essential to musical practice while quasidichotomies represent maximal opposition short of complete partition. We prove a generalized counterpoint theorem giving sufficient conditions for the existence of admitted successors. When the ambient topos turns non-zero successor objects into points, admitted succession can be iterated to form counterpoint paths, which may terminate at consonances with no admitted successor. The framework naturally accommodates counterpoint with sets instead of pure pitches, relaxing the ``yes/no'' character of classical consonance definitions and emphasizing context-dependence. Mazzola's model allows a Kuratowski closure operator induced by a polarity, which defines an internal topology enabling algebraic-topological analysis of counterpoint structure. We conclude by showing this construction generalizes to involutive morphisms. This categorical approach provides foundations for understanding both the historical evolution of contrapuntal practice and cross-cultural divergences in interval organization.

math.CT

From 3-crossed modules to Gray-type 4-categories

In this paper, we investigate the relation between the category of 3-crossed modules and the category of Gray-type 4-groups. The notion of a 3-crossed module was first introduced by Arvasi \textit{et al.}, motivated by the question of what kind of algebraic structure completely encodes a homotopy 4-type. On the other hand, from the point of view that higher groups are equivalent to algebraic realizations of higher categories -- as exemplified by the relationship between 2-crossed modules and Gray 3-groups established by Sarikaya--Ulualan -- it had not been clear how the 3-crossed modules of Arvasi \textit{et al.} relate to any higher category. In our previous paper, we proposed a new definition of a 3-crossed module and observed that it admits a natural interpretation in terms of higher categories. In this paper, we make this interpretation precise: we introduce a 4-category, which reduces to a semistrict braided monoidal 2-category when restricted to a single object and a single 1-morphism, and prove that the category of our 3-crossed modules is equivalent to the category of Gray 4-groups, defined as single-object versions of this 4-category in which all morphisms are invertible. We therefore expect that these structures can correctly capture the topological nature of surface knots and higher-dimensional manifolds.

math.CT

Observations on the variety of equationally linear Heyting semilattices

In previous work, we analysed a number of categorical properties, of interest in the context of Janelidze-Márki-Tholen semi-abelian categories, for the variety $\mathsf{HSLat}$ of Heyting semilattices. In this paper, we focus on the subvariety $\mathsf{ELHSLat}$ of equationally linear Heyting semilattices. Our main objective is to show that, unlike $\mathsf{HSLat}$, this category is algebraically coherent. We furthermore prove that it is neither locally algebraically cartesian closed nor cosmash associative.

math.CT