Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2608.12049

Token-Level Credit Assignment Optimization for Generative Document Retrieval

Abstract

Generative retrieval models perform document retrieval by autoregressively generating document identifiers (DocIDs). This process naturally forms a sequential decision problem, i.e., the model makes a sequence of token-level decisions, selecting a DocID token at each decoding step, with the resulting complete sequence identifying the retrieved document. However, relevance feedback is available only after the complete DocID has been generated and mapped to a document, resulting in a granularity mismatch between token-level generation decisions and document-level retrieval supervision. Consequently, existing reinforcement learning methods for generative retrieval rely on sequence-level rewards, assigning the same document-level relevance signal to every decoding step. Such uniform credit assignment obscures the contribution of individual token decisions, making it difficult to identify which decisions contribute to retrieval success or failure. In this paper, we propose Token-Level Credit Assignment for Generative Retrieval (TCA), a fine-grained reinforcement learning framework that aligns the granularity of credit assignment with that of autoregressive DocID generation. Unlike assigning a single reward to an entire generated DocID, TCA derives fine-grained rewards by comparing the hidden-state trajectory of each generated DocID with the gold DocID trajectory obtained from a frozen reference model. These trajectory-based rewards provide differentiated feedback across decoding steps, allowing the policy to reinforce generation paths that remain aligned with the target DocID. Moreover, TCA decouples token-level credit assignment from policy optimization and can be instantiated with both GRPO and PPO. Experiments on benchmarks show that our method consistently outperforms baselines, demonstrating the effectiveness of fine-grained supervision for aligning DocID generation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Xinpeng Zhao, Yang Liu, Ran Chen, Xinyu Ma, Daiting Shi, Pengjie Ren, Zhumin Chen, Zhaochun Ren, Xin Xin. 2026-08-24. Token-Level Credit Assignment Optimization for Generative Document Retrieval. https://doi.org/10.1145/3799682.3840833

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

WebArxiv: A Reproducible Benchmark for Evaluating Multimodal Web Agents on arXiv Tasks

Foundation models now enable autonomous agents to interact with real-world websites, but existing benchmarks emphasize general-purpose browsing, underrepresent research-oriented environments and scholarly discovery workflows, and often depend on live sites whose changing content and structure undermine reproducibility. arXiv provides a realistic, reproducible, hierarchically structured, information-centric testbed without privacy-sensitive interactions. We introduce WebArxiv, a static-snapshot benchmark comprising 510 time-invariant tasks, each with a unique deterministic ground truth. Its diverse, realistic scholarly tasks go beyond simple information lookup and rule following to emphasize multi-constraint paper retrieval, fine-grained content extraction, and cross-paper comparison. Evaluations of a range of foundation-model-based web agents show that WebArxiv remains challenging. Behavioral analysis reveals that agents over-rely on fixed interaction histories, causing incomplete or repetitive reasoning. We therefore equip agents with a lightweight dynamic-memory mechanism for adaptive retrieval and reasoning over relevant context. The benchmark and code are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/74E4423BVNW/README.md.

cs.IR

GreekBarRetrieval: A Benchmark for Greek Statutory Retrieval

Statutory retrieval is necessary for citation-grounded legal question answering, but remains underexplored for Greek. We introduce GreekBarRetrieval, a public retrieval benchmark derived from, and complementing GreekBarBench, which did not include retrieval. The new benchmark comprises 283 bar-exam questions, each accompanied by the facts of the case it refers to, and 6,308 candidate statutory articles to retrieve from. Questions and facts are stated in everyday language, but need to be mapped to the formal terminology of statutes and their abstract legal concepts. A further complication is that not all of the case facts are relevant to each question of a case. Experimenting with three BM25 variants and nine dense retrievers, we find that vanilla dense retrieval far outperforms vanilla sparse retrieval in Recall@100. However, LLM-based query reformulation helps BM25 close that gap, while also improving dense retrieval. With a ten-round ReAct-like LLM reformulation loop that we introduce, BM25 improves further in Recall@100 and obtains the best nDCG and MAP scores of all tested retrievers. Query reformulation also outperforms pseudo-relevance feedback, sparse-dense fusion, and English translation.

cs.IR

Parameterized Dense-Sparse Fusion for Hybrid Retrieval: Tuning a Rank-Score Mix on BEIR SciFact with Qdrant

We study a parameterized hybrid ranker that fuses a dense embedding list and a sparse lexical list. The method has a small, explicit parameter vector: a dense prior $α\in [0,1]$, a score-versus-rank mix $λ\in [0,1]$, an RRF smoothing parameter $κ> 0$, optional list-geometry coefficients that move $α$ per query, and a router margin $τ$ that can turn sparse search off. We grid-search those ranges on SciFact train (809 queries) and freeze the chosen values on SciFact test (300). The tuned rank-score mix ($α= 0.8$, $λ= 0.75$, $κ= 20$) reaches 0.753 nDCG@10 and 0.889 recall@10, outperforming dense BGE (0.742 / 0.871) and equal-weight RRF (0.707 nDCG@10) on that test split. A list-conditioned $α$ adds +0.0006 nDCG; a sparse-off router is rejected by the same train split (any $τ$ that skipped approximately 50% of queries lost nDCG). These coefficients are dataset-specific. Equal RRF with the same models does not beat dense on a nine-zip BEIR macro-average (0.479 vs. 0.519 nDCG@10). Repeating the same train-then-freeze sweep independently on all 20 indexed units beats equal RRF on 20/20 and dense on 16/20 (unit-mean nDCG@10 0.467 vs. 0.462 dense vs. 0.420 RRF). Other corpora should reuse the ranges, not a copy of the SciFact point.

cs.IR