Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2608.13086

Axioms of Continuous Separation

Abstract

For a $T_1$-space $X$, let $Cld(X)$ denote all its nonempty closed subsets and $T_4(X)=\{(F_1,F_2)\in Cld(X)^2:F_1\cap F_2=\emptyset\}$. In terms of closed sets, $X$ is $T_4$ iff for each $(F_1,F_2)\in T_4(X)$, there is a pair of closed sets $ϕ_1(F_1,F_2)$ and $ϕ_2(F_1,F_2)$ such that their union is $X$ and $F_j\cap ϕ_j(F_1,F_2)=\emptyset$ for $j=1,2$. Thus, in this paper, for a topology $τ$ on $Cld(X)$, we introduce the definition: A $T_1$-space $X$ is called $CT_4$ with respect to $τ$ if the above maps $ϕ_j:T_4(X)\to Cld(X)$ are continuous on $τ$. Similarly, for $i=1,2,3$, we can define a $T_1$-space to be $CT_i$ for $τ$. We only consider the Vietoris topology on $Cld(X)$ and show that every $CT_4$-space is countably compact, and every $CT_3$-space is a Fréchet-Urysohn space, every separable subspace of a $CT_3$-space is metrizable. We give relevant examples. Any finite-dimensional cubes, the infinite-dimensional cube, any finite-dimensional spheres, and all 0-dimensional compact metrizable spaces are $CT_4$. All infinite discrete spaces, all finite-dimensional Euclidean spaces and all countable limit ordinal spaces are $CT_3$ but not $CT_4$. Also, each metrizable space with a unique non-isolated point is $CT_3$, and is $CT_4$ if it is compact. Moreover, the infinite sum of $CT_3$ spaces is $CT_3$ but not $CT_4$. Every countable space with a unique non-isolated point is $CT_2$, and it is $CT_3$ if and only if it is metrizable. All subfields of real numbers and their complement spaces are $CT_2$ but not $CT_4$; and their $CT_3$ status remains unclear. All uncountable ordinal spaces are not $CT_2$. The one-point compactification of any uncountable discrete space is not $CT_2$. $CT_1$ and $T_1$ are equivalent, hence all spaces above are $CT_1$. Open Problems: is there a non-metrizable $CT_3$ or $CT_4$ space? Is any compact $CT_2$ space $CT_3$ or $CT_4$?

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zhongqiang Yang, Nada Wu. 2026-09-01. Axioms of Continuous Separation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13086

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Sobriety of Scott topologies under countability conditions

In this paper, we focus on the sobriety of the Scott topology in countable case. Specifically, we show that: (1) every meet-continuous core-compact countable dcpo is sober with respect to the Scott topology; (2)every countable locally compact dcpo is sober endowed with the Scott topology; (3) the lattice of all open sets for the rational numbers space Q equipped with the Scott topology is not sober.

math.GN

Exponentiable Objects and Function spaces in Lowen Fuzzy Topological Spaces

We study exponentiable objects and function spaces in the category of stratified Lowen fuzzy topological spaces over \(\I=[0,1]\). Using the Lowen fuzzy Sierpiński object \(\Sier\), which identifies \(τ_X\) with \(C(X,\Sier)\), we explicitly determine the largest splitting topology on this mapping set. Its open weights \(Φ:τ_X\to\I\) are precisely those satisfying Scott continuity and a finite-tier compatibility condition induced by finite powers of \(\Sier\). This yields an intrinsic characterization: \(X\) is exponentiable if and only if every \(μ\inτ_X\) satisfies \[ μ=\bigvee_{λ\triangleleftΦ} (\const{Φ(μ)}\wedgeλ), \qquad λ\triangleleftΦ \Longleftrightarrow \const{Φ(ν)}\wedgeλ\leqν \quad(ν\inτ_X). \] When this condition holds, \(Y^X\) has underlying set \(C(X,Y)\), with topology generated by \([Φ,v](f)=Φ(v\circ f)\). We also obtain a dual closed-set formulation and three applications. Exponentiability implies that \(τ_X\) is a continuous lattice, although the converse fails. Moreover, a classical space \(X\) is exponentiable exactly when its induced fuzzy space \(ωX\) is exponentiable in the entire stratified Lowen category. Finally, Lowen compact, strongly fuzzy compact, and \(N\)-compact Hausdorff spaces are exponentiable.

math.GN

Super calibers in topological spaces and topological hyperspaces

We study the notion of a super caliber of a topological space, which is closely related to the classical notion of caliber and has appeared in the literature under several different names. We collect and unify several known results and establish new results concerning the collections of super calibers of topological spaces and their hyperspaces. In particular, we investigate the relationship between the super calibers of a space $X$ and those of hyperspaces $\mathcal{H}(X)$ lying between $\mathrm{CL}(X)$ and $\mathcal{F}(X)$. For infinite metrizable spaces, we characterize several cases in which $\mathsf{SC}(X)$ and $\mathsf{SC}(\mathrm{CL}(X))$ differ and establish an independence result over \textsf{ZFC}; see Theorem~5.12.

math.GN