Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2608.27527

FVeinSyn: Synthetic Finger Vein Image Generator

Abstract

A major challenge in finger vein recognition is the lack of large-scale public datasets. Existing datasets contain few identities and limited samples per finger, restricting the advancement of deep learning-based methods. To address this, we propose FVeinSyn, a large-scale controllable synthetic data generation framework for finger vein. It explicitly decouples synthesis of vascular topology and imaging appearance to mitigate the limitations caused by insufficient training samples, such as inadequate identity diversity and restricted realism. Specifically: first, a finger vein identity generator models vascular topology under physiological and geometric constraints using stochastic L-systems, producing anatomically valid and identity-distinctive vascular patterns. Then, a cascaded region-aware GAN renders the topological maps into realistic near-infrared images. Finally, an intra-class diversity generator introduces geometric and optical perturbations to simulate realistic intra-class variations. Using FVeinSyn, we generated 500,000 images (10,000 vein identities, 50 samples per identity) and conducted extensive evaluations. Results show that FVeinSyn holds significant advantages in realism, identity diversity, vascular pattern consistency, and intra-class diversity. Models trained with FVeinSyn outperform real-data-only baselines a cross eight public datasets, achieving an average accuracy improvement of 27.43\%. The code is available at: https://github.com/EvanWang98/Synthetic-Finger-Vein-Generator.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Yifan Wang, Jie Gui, Adams Wai Kin Kong, Baosheng Yu, Changsheng Chen, Qi Li, Zhenan Sun, James Tin-Yau Kwok, Alex Kot. 2026-08-27. FVeinSyn: Synthetic Finger Vein Image Generator. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27527

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related discoveries

A survey of AI-generated voices and their detection

The ability of artificial intelligence (AI) models to generate highly realistic human voices has advanced rapidly. These technologies power accessibility tools, virtual assistants and creative applications, but they also enable harmful uses, including impersonation, fraud and disinformation. Recent incidents of voice cloning scams targeting businesses and political leaders underscore the urgent need for robust safeguards. Unlike image and video deepfakes, the detection of synthetic voices poses unique challenges due to the complexity of phonetics, prosody and auditory perception. This survey offers a comprehensive overview of AI voice generation and detection methods, encompassing both the technical foundations and the latest state-of-the-art advances. This study also identifies key open challenges, benchmark resources and future directions to make this survey useful for future researchers.

cs.AI

When Saying No Makes Better Videos: Designing Dual Gatekeeping for Pedagogically Grounded AI Content Creation

To prevent the adoption of aesthetically polished but pedagogically flawed AI content, we study a video authoring pipeline featuring two layers of structured refusal. The first layer empowers educators to iteratively reshape AI scripts based on multimedia learning theory, while the second employs automated metrics to flag violations in instructional coherence and narrative-visual synchronization. While neither layer is exhaustive, their synergy ensures that principled resistance--the act of deferring AI output until it meets rigorous standards--becomes a catalyst for higher quality. Evaluation combining a study with 23 educators across 3 topics and automated metrics across 7 topics drawn from established science and philosophy curricula shows that both layers independently improve the same instructional dimensions, suggesting that thoughtful resistance and generative AI are not opposites but partners.

cs.AI

Measuring Similarity between Artistic and AI Generated Images using Siamese Neural Networks

AI-generated art has sparked debates around potential plagiarism, as these images may closely resemble existing artworks. This research quantifies the similarity between original pieces and AI-generated counterparts, particularly those produced by the Stable Diffusion XL Refiner 1.0. We use Siamese Networks with frozen CLIP encoders and cosine similarity optimized through triplet loss. A dataset of paired original and generated images was built using image-to-image generation and custom prompts, enriched with semantic descriptors and BLIP-2 captions. Prior studies report up to 81\% style replication and 90\% visual similarity. Our results show high discriminative performance: training accuracy reached 99.9\%, and the best model configuration achieved 99.4\% test accuracy with strong inter-class separation ($δμ$ = 0.677), demonstrating the effectiveness of our semantic-visual embeddings.

cs.CV