Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2608.28608

NLP-Driven Knowledge Extraction and Thematic Classification of Translated Ancient Indian Medical Texts

M. S. Rajeevan·B. Mini Devi·V. S. Anoop·C. Mallikarjuna
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Ancient Indian medical texts like Sushruta Samhita have extensive information on diseases, treatments, and surgical techniques. Yet, their ancient format and use of intricate vocabulary pose difficulties in accessibility and systematic ordering. The research here utilizes Natural Language Processing (NLP) methods like Named Entity Recognition (NER), BERTopic modeling, and Knowledge Graph development in Neo4j to extract, categorize, and visualize important concepts based on translated versions. Thematic classification with BERTopic allows for the identification of the underlying medical topics, whereas NER supports the structured entity recognition of diseases, treatments, researchers, and medicinal plants. Graphbased network analysis with Neo4j also allows for the semantic representation of relationship among extracted entities, supporting knowledge retrieval and digital preservation. The findings illustrate how graph databases, topic modeling, and entity recognition facilitate the computational organization of Ayurveda's historical medical wisdom, closing the gap between the conventional texts and contemporary data-driven inquiry. The suggested method promotes historical text analysis, medical informatics, and digital humanities to make ancient Indian medical wisdom more accessible and understandable.

Explore related subjects

cs.CLcs.AIcs.IR

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

M. S. Rajeevan, B. Mini Devi, V. S. Anoop, C. Mallikarjuna. 2026-07-08. NLP-Driven Knowledge Extraction and Thematic Classification of Translated Ancient Indian Medical Texts. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.28608

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.AI subjectcs.CL subjectcs.IR subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

SABER-Math: Automated Benchmark for Information Retrieval Evaluation in Mathematics

As agentic AI systems tackle more complex mathematical tasks, they increasingly rely on information retrieval (IR) to search problem databases, theorem libraries, and educational resources. However, choosing the right retriever remains difficult, as it is infeasible to directly isolate its effect on downstream performance. On the other hand, existing retrieval-specific benchmarks often fail to capture fine-grained mathematical relevance, penalizing relevant documents. We address this gap by introducing SABER-Math, the first fully automated benchmark for evaluating mathematical IR without expert annotation. Starting from 283K high-school-level math problems with solutions, SABER-Math builds challenging reranking tasks in three steps: (i) first, LLMs extract concise solution summaries and mathematical topics for each problem; (ii) then, per-query relevant documents are discovered using ontology topic-based and lexical solutions-summary-based similarities, and (iii) finally, a Swiss-style LLM preference tournament produces fine-grained relevance ratings for the documents. We evaluate lexical retrievers, specialized mathematical retrieval systems, and recent embedding models. We find that while modern embedding models substantially outperform classical and math-specific baselines, even the strongest systems struggle in symbol-heavy domains like Algebra and Calculus. Importantly, we show that general-purpose IR benchmarks such as MTEB do not reliably predict mathematical performance, especially for recent embedding models, highlighting the need for math-specific retrieval benchmarks.

cs.IR↗
arXiv2026

Search, Inspect, Fetch: Exploiting Structure-Aware Boolean Retrieval for Deep-Search Agents

Existing deep-search agents use a Search-Visit workflow that retrieves whole webpages without considering the structure they expose through titles, headings, sections, and metadata. This prevents agents from directly constraining retrieval to parts of a webpage and often carries irrelevant content into their context. We introduce Sieve, a search-inspect-fetch strategy driven by a Boolean Query Language (BQL): it searches webpage fields to filter candidates, uses an interchangeable ranker to order them, presents structure-rich result cards for inspection, and fetches only selected sections. Across three QA collections, Sieve is more accurate than the strongest conventional Search-Visit configuration on each collection while using 20.7-50.6% fewer tokens. Boolean filtering improves every tested ranker, and the accuracy-context advantage persists across retriever choices and agent backbones. Our implementation is included in the SkimSearchAgent library https://github.com/ielab/skim-search-agent.

cs.IR↗
arXiv2026

Answer Bubbles: Information Exposure in AI-Mediated Search

Generative search systems are increasingly replacing link-based retrieval with AI-generated summaries, yet little is known about how these systems differ in sources, language, and fidelity to cited material. We examine responses to 11,000 real search queries across five systems---vanilla GPT, Search GPT, Perplexity Search with Grok, Google AI Overviews, and traditional Google Search---at three levels: source diversity, linguistic characterization of the generated summary, and source-summary fidelity. We find that generative search systems exhibit significant \textit{source-selection} biases in their citations, favoring certain sources over others. Incorporating search also selectively attenuates epistemic markers, reducing hedging by up to 60\% while preserving confidence language in the AI-generated summaries. At the same time, AI summaries further compound the citation biases: Wikipedia and longer sources are disproportionately overrepresented, whereas cited social media content and negatively framed sources are substantially underrepresented. Our findings highlight the potential for \textit{answer bubbles}, in which identical queries yield structurally different information realities across systems, with implications for user trust, source visibility, and the transparency of AI-mediated information access.

cs.IR↗