arXiv · 2609.00641
AM-Bench: A Modular Simulation Suite and Benchmark for Aerial Manipulation Policy Learning
Abstract
Standardized benchmarks have played a central role in advancing robot manipulation learning, yet most focus on ground-supported manipulation systems, which limits their applicability to dynamics-critical domains such as aerial manipulation (AM). AM presents distinct system-level challenges, including environmental disturbances, coupled dynamics between the manipulator and floating base, and constrained degrees of freedom. Consequently, task performance depends jointly on robot embodiment, low-level control, and high-level policy design. We introduce AM-Bench, a modular simulation suite and benchmark for multirotor-based AM policy learning. AM-Bench includes representative embodiments spanning underactuated, fully actuated, and overactuated systems, 12 tasks across contact, transport, and constrained interaction, configurable aerodynamic disturbances and actuator saturation, standard low-level controllers, and baseline policy-learning algorithms. Unlike prior manipulation benchmarks that primarily emphasize end-to-end policy performance, AM-Bench enables system-level evaluation of how embodiment, control, disturbances, and policy choices interact. We demonstrate its diagnostic value through three simulation studies spanning high-level policies, policy--control interfaces, and embodiments, together with real-world validation of modeled effects and a hardware test of the learning pipeline.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Yutong Wang, Dongjae Lee, Xiaofeng Guo, Yuanzhu Zhan, Yufei Jiang, Bavin Saravanan, Muqing Cao, Jia Xie, Chenyang Mao, Sebastian Scherer, Junyi Geng, Guanya Shi. 2026-09-01. AM-Bench: A Modular Simulation Suite and Benchmark for Aerial Manipulation Policy Learning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.00641
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
Discover connections
Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.