arXiv subjects

Bavin Saravanan

Publications and source records attributed to Bavin Saravanan.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Fly-by-Code: Embodied Coding Agents for Aerial Manipulation with Active Visual and Physical Feedback

Embodied coding agents construct robot policies from natural-language instructions by generating executable programs and refining them from execution feedback. This refinement assumes that execution feedback reveals whether the task succeeded and, after a failure, provides sufficient evidence to guide program revision. Aerial manipulation violates this assumption in two ways. Payload constraints restrict onboard camera coverage and leave task-critical outcomes outside the robot's view (partial observability), while strong dynamic coupling and limited control margins make physical interactions fragile (limited interaction robustness) and leave failure causes unresolved. Re-examining the same feedback cannot recover observations that were never collected or separate failure causes that the available evidence does not distinguish. To acquire this missing evidence, we introduce Active Feedback (AF), an active "View and Probe" framework. When execution feedback leaves unresolved questions, the agent synthesizes a separate diagnostic program that runs in simulation to inspect unseen outcomes from informative viewpoints (View) or test hypotheses about failure causes through targeted physical interactions (Probe). Across six simulated aerial manipulation tasks with 60 trials per condition, AF reduces false completion declarations from 25 to 5 and raises final task success from 31.7% to 75% compared with terminal feedback under the same coding-agent configuration and task-execution limit. Using shared robot APIs, task programs refined with AF in simulation run on a physical aerial manipulator without task-program source-code modification and complete multi-stage manipulation tasks in the real world. These results show that executable diagnosis fills gaps in execution feedback for embodied coding agents, improving both completion assessment and program refinement in aerial manipulation.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

Drone Soccer: Learning to Manipulate with Multicopter Downwash

Although multicopter drones are traditionally designed for "perception-only" tasks, like mapping and exploration, recent work has sought to develop Unmanned Aerial Manipulators (UAMs) to solve mobile manipulation tasks. Aerial manipulation performance can be impacted by "downwash," the airflow produced by propellers, but current state-of-the-art UAMs either ignore downwash or treat it as a disturbance. Instead, is it possible to actively use downwash as a tool during manipulation? We design a drone soccer task to explore the feasibility of downwash-based manipulation. Specifically, we develop a simplified downwash dynamics model which we use to train an RL policy to dribble a soccer ball. We further demonstrate that our policy transfers to real world deployment. This work provides key insights into novel manipulation capabilities for multicopters.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

AM-Bench: A Modular Simulation Suite and Benchmark for Aerial Manipulation Policy Learning

Standardized benchmarks have played a central role in advancing robot manipulation learning, yet most focus on ground-supported manipulation systems, which limits their applicability to dynamics-critical domains such as aerial manipulation (AM). AM presents distinct system-level challenges, including environmental disturbances, coupled dynamics between the manipulator and floating base, and constrained degrees of freedom. Consequently, task performance depends jointly on robot embodiment, low-level control, and high-level policy design. We introduce AM-Bench, a modular simulation suite and benchmark for multirotor-based AM policy learning. AM-Bench includes representative embodiments spanning underactuated, fully actuated, and overactuated systems, 12 tasks across contact, transport, and constrained interaction, configurable aerodynamic disturbances and actuator saturation, standard low-level controllers, and baseline policy-learning algorithms. Unlike prior manipulation benchmarks that primarily emphasize end-to-end policy performance, AM-Bench enables system-level evaluation of how embodiment, control, disturbances, and policy choices interact. We demonstrate its diagnostic value through three simulation studies spanning high-level policies, policy--control interfaces, and embodiments, together with real-world validation of modeled effects and a hardware test of the learning pipeline.

cs.RO↗