Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2609.02646

Differentiable Electricity-Market Clearing for Gradient-Based Planning

Abstract

Planning a large data center is difficult because a facility big enough to matter changes the electricity prices it will pay. Those prices are set by market clearing, a constrained optimization problem solved anew in every operating condition. However, simulating the market tells a planner how a candidate plan performs but not how to improve it. Here we treat market clearing as a differentiable optimization layer: each forward pass solves the market, and reverse-mode automatic differentiation propagates the planning cost back through the cleared prices to the plan. After validating these gradients against finite differences, we apply them to a concrete problem: allocating 50 MW of data-center load across six candidate buses in two synthetic networks, under a fixed cost per active site, evaluated over 36 operating states. Judged against exhaustive enumeration of all site combinations, gradient optimization recovers the continuous allocations almost exactly, with worst-case objective gaps of 2.3\% and 8.5\% of the cost difference between the best and worst single site. Its one systematic error is instructive: near the costs at which a site should close, the smooth relaxation of the discrete site count shrinks the site rather than closing it, so discrete transitions arrive late. Differentiable market clearing thus turns market-aware planning into a problem gradients can search.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Luca Mungo, Maarten P. Scholl, Arnau Quera-Bofarull. 2026-09-02. Differentiable Electricity-Market Clearing for Gradient-Based Planning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.02646

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Can machines think efficiently?

The Turing Test is no longer adequate for distinguishing human and machine intelligence. With advanced artificial intelligence systems already passing the original Turing Test and contributing to serious ethical and environmental concerns, we urgently need to update the test. This work expands upon the original imitation game by accounting for an additional factor: the energy spent answering the questions. By adding the constraint of energy, the new test forces us to evaluate intelligence through the lens of efficiency, connecting the abstract problem of thinking to the concrete reality of finite resources. Further, this proposed new test ensures the evaluation of intelligence has a measurable, practical finish line that the original test lacks. This additional constraint compels society to weigh the time savings of using artificial intelligence against its total resource cost.

cs.LG

Applying foundation model embeddings towards urban livability evaluation

While accurate measurement of socioeconomic indicators remains challenging in data-scarce regions, which limits policy interventions and resource allocation, high-resolution geospatial data is widely available and can contain information on various livability statistics. We investigate which physical features are encoded within foundation model embeddings, such as AlphaEarth, AnySat, and TerraMind, and provide a systematic framework for identifying the most predictive geospatial indicators. By analyzing how different types of geospatial data influence urban livability predictions, our approach enables researchers to prioritize the most informative features for their specific applications. Additionally, we demonstrate how to leverage foundation model embeddings to enhance prediction performance for these outcomes. This work contributes a principled methodology for extracting actionable information from satellite imagery while accounting for complex spatial dependencies, with applications in predicting urban livability in regions with limited observation data.

cs.LG

From Street Form to Spatial Justice: Explaining Urban Exercise Inequality via a Triadic SHAP-Informed Framework

Urban streets are essential everyday health infrastructure, yet their capacity to support physical activity is unevenly distributed. This study develops a theory-informed and explainable framework to diagnose street-level exercise deprivation by integrating Lefebvre's spatial triad with multi-source urban data and SHAP-based analysis. Using Shenzhen as a case study, we show that while conceived spatial attributes have the strongest overall influence on exercise intensity, local deprivation mechanisms vary substantially across contexts. We identify a seven-mode typology of deprivation and locate high-demand but low-support street segments as priority areas for intervention. The study offers both a theory-grounded analytical framework and a practical diagnostic tool for promoting spatial justice in everyday physical activity.

cs.CY