Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2609.04396

A Numerical Approach to the Realizability Problems for Memoryless Nash and Epsilon Equilibria in Concurrent Multiplayer Reachability Games

Abstract

The existence of equilibria, which is called the realizability problem in the formal methods community, for probabilistic undiscounted state-based systems has proven to be an incredibly challenging research setting. In this paper, we consider a restricted version of the classic realizability problem by focusing on equilibria that are both memoryless and numerically constrained. While the restriction to memoryless strategies is relatively common in the literature, numerical constraints, to the best of our knowledge, represent a new and powerful approach. First, we consider the existence of memoryless equilibria when all numbers involved must be rational numbers of a pre-defined limited size. Then, we extend this analysis to field extensions of the rational numbers created through radical algebraic generators. When the basis is provided for the latter, both realizability problems are NP-complete for both exact and epsilon Nash equilibria. Finally, we consider an unconstrained numerical setting. While the characterization of the exact Nash equilibria realizability problem as ETR-complete is one of the most celebrated results in the literature, we demonstrate that the constructions underlying this result are flawed as presented. We then mend said constructions to preserve the ETR upper bound, and note that the lower bound in the literature does not apply to the epsilon-equilibrium setting. Overall, this paper demonstrates an interesting relationship between the complexity of the realizability problem and the "complexity" of the numbers involved in the representations of strategies.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Senthil Rajasekaran, Jean-François Raskin, Moshe Y. Vardi. 2026-09-03. A Numerical Approach to the Realizability Problems for Memoryless Nash and Epsilon Equilibria in Concurrent Multiplayer Reachability Games. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04396

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Self-Geometry: GT-Free and Plug-and-Play Test-Time Adaptation for Geometrically Consistent 3D Vision Foundation Models

Recent Vision Foundation Models (VFMs) predict depth, camera pose, and pointmap in a single forward pass without per-scene optimization, achieving strong generalization. However, enforcing explicit multi-view geometric consistency, e.g., through bundle adjustment, is computationally costly and is thus not imposed during VFM pretraining, so such inconsistency can arise. To address this, implicit self-consistency derived from model outputs (e.g., pointmaps, features), though enforced at test-time in prior work, delivers inherently limited performance gain, especially on scenes where the pretrained VFM is highly inaccurate. In contrast to this implicit signal, we propose Self-Geometry, a plug-and-play test-time adaptation pipeline that directly imposes explicit multi-view geometric constraints using 2D pixel correspondences as pseudo ground-truth. Our proposed Self-Geometry consists of Geometric Disentanglement Optimization, which combines Multi-View Consistency and Epipolar Consistency losses with Gradient Disentanglement to prevent gradient conflict; Frame Angular-Neighbor, a view sampler based on SO(3) geodesic distances for lightly imposing these constraints; and Lightweight TTA, which adapts VFMs via LoRA. Our method achieves consistent improvements in both pose and geometry estimation across six VFMs (VGGT, $π^3$, DA3-Giant/Large/Base/Small) and four benchmarks (7Scenes, ETH3D, ScanNet++, HiRoom).

cs.CV

Peer Oversight in Collective Decision Making

This article introduces peer $k$-oversight, a property of sequential collective decision mechanisms requiring at least $k$ agents to be responsible for every harmful outcome. It is shown that whenever $k$-oversight can be achieved by redistributing control over the decisions in a mechanism, it can be achieved using just $k$ agents. A polynomial-time algorithm is also presented that determines whether such a redistribution exists and, when it does, constructs one. These results establish peer oversight as a tractable design principle for multiagent decision-making systems.

cs.GT