Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2609.04636

Blind Random Search with Noisy Loss Measurements: Averaging, Thresholding, and Almost Sure Convergence

Abstract

Blind random search repeatedly draws a candidate point and replaces the current estimate whenever the candidate has a lower loss. In the absence of noise, the true loss is observed directly. It decreases strictly at every accepted update and is monotone nonincreasing over all iterations. Measurement noise can make a worse candidate appear better and thereby break this monotonicity. To recover almost sure convergence under noise, we incorporate averaging and thresholding into the original decision criterion. These two classical tools are coupled. As the sample sizes grow, the positive threshold shrinks at a matched rate. These modifications allow blind random search to recover eventual monotonicity of the true loss under noisy measurements and to converge almost surely.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Zixian Zhou, Xintong Jiang. 2026-09-04. Blind Random Search with Noisy Loss Measurements: Averaging, Thresholding, and Almost Sure Convergence. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04636

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A simple derivation of the Kalman filter

In this lecture note, we present a concise and self-contained derivation of the discrete-time Kalman filter equations that requires only a basic understanding of least squares estimation. The treatment is designed to minimize mathematical overhead while preserving both rigor and generality.

math.OC

Two Adjoint Perspectives on Fokker-Planck Optimization: A Microscopic-Macroscopic Correspondence

The Fokker-Planck equation admits both a macroscopic Eulerian description through probability densities and a microscopic Lagrangian description through stochastic trajectories. Consequently, optimization problems constrained by the Fokker-Planck equation can be formulated from either perspective. Surprisingly, the corresponding adjoint equations appear to be fundamentally different: the macroscopic adjoint is governed by the backward Kolmogorov equation, whereas the microscopic adjoint evolves pathwise along stochastic trajectories. In this note, we reconcile these two formulations by establishing their correspondence in the continuum setting. We further show that, although their discrete gradients no longer coincide after discretization, both provide consistent numerical approximations of the continuum gradient. Explicit convergence rates are established for both discretization strategies.

math.NA