Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2609.06960

iBrain: A Unified Foundation Model Reading the Brain from Surface to Spikes

Abstract

Invasive neural recordings provide high-fidelity measurements of brain activity, with signals such as intracranial EEG (iEEG) and intracortical spiking activity capturing neural dynamics at different spatial and temporal scales. Yet existing neural foundation models have largely been developed independently for different invasive recording paradigms, leaving joint pretraining across heterogeneous invasive signals underexplored. In this work, we introduce iBrain, a unified foundation model that jointly learns from iEEG and spiking activity. iBrain employs signal-specific encoders to accommodate their distinct signal characteristics and a shared spatiotemporal Transformer backbone to model dependencies across recording channels and time. We pretrain iBrain on over 7,000 hours of heterogeneous neural recordings using masked signal reconstruction and channel-view alignment, promoting contextual modeling of neural dynamics and robustness across different channels. iBrain consistently outperforms single-signal pretraining baselines and achieves state-of-the-art performance on multiple benchmarks. Further experiments demonstrate that iBrain exhibits transferability and data efficiency across diverse recording settings. These results highlight the potential of joint pretraining on heterogeneous invasive neural recordings to support scalable neural modeling and transferable representations across recording settings and downstream tasks.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ying Chen, Tiou Wang, Zhifeng Yue. 2026-09-07. iBrain: A Unified Foundation Model Reading the Brain from Surface to Spikes. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.06960

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Reducing Catastrophic Risk from AI with Systematic Monitoring and Evaluation of Rogue AI Progression

This article presents a structured framework of behavioral indicators that may signal progression toward potentially catastrophic threats from artificial intelligence systems. We adopt a pragmatic approach, inspired by established methodologies in cybersecurity and national security. By establishing clear metrics, indicators, and thresholds across multiple dimensions of AI capability and behavior, this framework enables researchers and policymakers to implement evidence-based monitoring protocols.

cs.CY

Impact of AI Search Summaries on Website Traffic: Evidence from Google AI Overviews and Wikipedia

Search engines increasingly display AI-generated answers above organic links, potentially displacing traffic to upstream publishers. We estimate the impact of Google's AI Overviews (AIO) on Wikipedia's search traffic using AIO's staggered geographic rollout and Wikipedia's multilingual structure. Our difference-in-differences design compares monthly external-search referrals to English Wikipedia articles with referrals to the same articles in German and French, and finds that default AIO availability reduced English search traffic by 5.45% and 4.82%, respectively. Our results suggest that answer-producing digital intermediaries can materially reallocate attention away from informational publishers, with implications for content monetization, search platform design, and policy.

cs.CY

The End of AI Exponentiation: Fluttering Inside and Outside AI Bubble

The exponentiation of Artificial intelligence (AI) in the recent past has entered a transformative era that has been driven by the growth in large language models (LLMs), large-scale compute infrastructures, and autonomous reasoning systems. However, the rapid acceleration of AI has increasingly shown technological, societal, economic, ethical and infrastructural challenges associated with peak data limitations, rising computational demands, synthetic data recursion, valuation inflation, and societal instability. The traditional scaling paradigms that have powered the modern AI systems are gradually encountering friction in sustaining continuous exponential growth. This paper views ``the end of AI exponentiation,'' thus exploring how it flutters inside and outside the bubble, where instability emerges within the AI ecosystem through compute and data-center races, speculative investments, and the rat-race toward superintelligence, and outside the ecosystem through labor disruption, governance concerns, public uncertainty, and geopolitical acceleration surrounding future intelligent systems and infrastructures globally.

cs.AI