Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2609.22651

Beyond a Single Optimal Design: A Dynamical Systems Characterization of Online Allocation with Convex Costs

Abstract

We study online allocation with convex costs (\OACC), a generalization of limited-supply models in which additional resources can be produced dynamically at convex cost. Prior work largely focuses on constructing a single algorithm that achieves strong competitive guarantees. In contrast, our main contribution is a structural characterization of the optimal design space of reserve functions (i.e., normalized pricing rules) for \OACC, yielding a family of optimal online algorithms. Using a principled dynamical-systems approach, we show that optimal online algorithms arise as solutions of a nonlinear eigenvalue problem: the optimal competitive ratio corresponds to the dominant eigenvalue, and the associated eigenfunction determines the optimal reserve function. This perspective establishes the existence of infinitely many optimal designs attaining the best possible competitive ratio, thereby unifying and generalizing a broad class of prior algorithms. Beyond unification, our characterization uncovers new structural phenomena, including the ability to flexibly mix dynamic and static pricing without loss of optimality and the construction of universally competitive algorithms under unknown or stochastic costs. We further extend the analysis to more structured settings such as supply-oblivious arrivals and hard supply constraints, obtaining sharper guarantees that improve upon previous bounds.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Haoxin Sang, Bo Sun, Xiaoqi Tan. 2026-09-18. Beyond a Single Optimal Design: A Dynamical Systems Characterization of Online Allocation with Convex Costs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.22651

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Learning in Structured Stackelberg Games

We initiate the study of structured Stackelberg games, a novel form of strategic interaction between a leader and a follower where contextual information can be predictive of the follower's (unknown) type. Motivated by applications such as security games and AI safety, we show how this additional structure can help the leader learn a utility-maximizing policy in both the online and distributional settings. In the online setting, we first prove that standard learning-theoretic measures of complexity do not characterize the difficulty of the leader's learning task. Notably, we find that there exists a learning-theoretic measure of complexity, analogous to the Littlestone dimension in online classification, that tightly characterizes the leader's instance-optimal regret. We term this the Stackelberg-Littlestone dimension, and leverage it to provide a provably optimal online learning algorithm. In the distributional setting, we provide analogous results by showing that two new dimensions control the sample complexity upper- and lower-bound.

cs.GT

Equilibrium and Infeasibility: A new solution concept for games

Addressing infeasibility in non-cooperative games has become an important topic, as many problems across different applications face this issue. In this paper, we propose a new solution concept for generalized games with possibly infeasible individual constraints. A solution is defined as the limit of a sequence of generalized Nash equilibria induced by games with penalty terms relaxing the individual constraints. Existence is established for a broad range of games and we provide conditions allowing to characterize a $ψ$-penalized solution as a strategy profile maximizing every player's utility over all her penalty minimizing strategies. A variation of Divide-the-Dollar serves as an illustrative example. We further establish the compatibility with the GNE and the solution to the Nash bargaining.

cs.GT

Subgame-Perfect Nash Equilibria of Plurality Voting with Abstention: a PSPACE-Completeness Result for Restricted Ballots

We consider sequential Plurality elections in which each voter may abstain or vote for a single candidate. Each voter assigns utilities to all candidates; for each voter, this induces a (weak) order over the candidates. Ties are resolved uniformly at random, and voting has a small positive cost, so that a voter prefers to abstain when their vote cannot change the election outcome. We consider a variant of this model where, for each voter, we additionally specify a prefix of her ranking, so that she is only allowed to vote for a candidate from that prefix (or abstain). We prove that for this variant of the model, deciding whether a designated candidate is among the election winners in a subgame-perfect equilibrium of the associated extensive-form game is PSPACE-complete. This partially resolves an open problem from the work of Desmedt and Elkind [2010].

cs.GT