Do LiDAR Language Models Really Understand Spatio-temporal Relationships?

Runyi Yang; Murat Akkoyun; Di Wen; Ruiping Liu; Yufan Chen; Junwei Zheng; Xiaoye Wang; Kailun Yang; Danda Pani Paudel; Luc Van Gool; Kunyu Peng

arXiv · 2609.24452

Do LiDAR Language Models Really Understand Spatio-temporal Relationships?

Runyi Yang·Murat Akkoyun·Di Wen·Ruiping Liu·Yufan Chen·Junwei Zheng·Xiaoye Wang·Kailun Yang·Danda Pani Paudel·Luc Van Gool·Kunyu Peng

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Recent 4D LiDAR language models aim to reason about objects and their evolving spatial relationships. Yet, in our evaluation, always selecting the same option nearly matches the multiple-choice accuracy of two B4DL-derived configurations. We introduce LiDAR-Hallu, a geometry-referenced benchmark and diagnostic protocol with 10,000 questions across 150 nuScenes scenes. It covers object existence, ego-relative position, distance ordering, relative motion, and temporal localization, with explicit rules for selecting objects, comparing times, and determining reference answers. Our protocol combines fixed-answer and candidate-content controls, cross-scene pairs with identical prompts but opposite reference answers, and relation-specific recall. Analysis of 100,000 recorded responses reveals failures hidden by aggregate accuracy. Candidate duration alone makes temporal answers predictable without observing LiDAR. On paired questions, the models frequently give the same answer to scenes requiring opposite answers. Relation-specific analysis further shows that both configurations miss every positive lateral-motion case across all tested conditions. Temporal-shuffle contrastive decoding provides little net improvement, as repairs are largely offset by new errors and the main failures persist. These results show that evaluating spatio-temporal reasoning requires testing whether models distinguish the queried physical relationships, rather than relying on individual-answer accuracy alone. The source code, checkpoints, and data are released at https://github.com/Awesome4D/4DMLLM_Hallucination_Bench.

Explore related subjects

cs.CV cs.AI cs.RO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Runyi Yang, Murat Akkoyun, Di Wen, Ruiping Liu, Yufan Chen, Junwei Zheng, Xiaoye Wang, Kailun Yang, Danda Pani Paudel, Luc Van Gool, Kunyu Peng. 2026-09-21. Do LiDAR Language Models Really Understand Spatio-temporal Relationships?. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.24452

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

SSP-GNN: Learning to Track via Bilevel Optimization

We propose a graph-based tracking formulation for multi-object tracking (MOT) where target detections contain kinematic information and re-identification features (attributes). Our method applies a successive shortest paths (SSP) algorithm to a tracking graph defined over a batch of frames. The edge costs in this tracking graph are computed via a message-passing network, a graph neural network (GNN) variant. The parameters of the GNN, and hence, the tracker, are learned end-to-end on a training set of example ground-truth tracks and detections. Specifically, learning takes the form of bilevel optimization guided by our novel loss function. We evaluate our algorithm on simulated scenarios to understand its sensitivity to scenario aspects and model hyperparameters. Across varied scenario complexities, our method compares favorably to a strong baseline.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

AdaptiveCDM: Source-Free Few-Shot Domain Adaptation for Cell Detection in Microscopic Images

Cross-domain cell detection for microscopic images suffers from performance degradation due to distribution shifts across imaging domains. Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (UDA) strategies, attempt to overcome domain sift without requiring annotated data from target. However, requirement of availability of annotated data from the source domain and large-size data from target domain are both challenging limitations for realistic scenarios. This is especially true in medical imaging, where privacy requirements might prevent access to annotated source data, and costly data acquisition restricts extensive sampling of the target domain. To address these challenges, we propose AdaptiveCDM, a modular framework for Source-Free Few-Shot Domain Adaptive Object Detection (SF-FSDAOD) setting, that adapts a pretrained source model using only few labeled target images without accessing source data. AdaptiveCDM combines Resolution-Aware Augmentation (RAug) and Category-Aware Representation Learning (CARL). RAug alleviates the scarcity and class imbalance by augmenting instance balanced training examples, while preserving the scale fidelity and morphological properties of cellular structures. CARL enhances discriminative representation learning by encouraging class-consistent proposals, improving both localization and classification. We also introduce two competitive baselines for proposed setting: Faster-FreeShot and MT-FreeShot. Our approach achieves 40.4/43.4 mAP0.5 on M5 and 67.1/75.5 mAP0.5 on Raabin-WBC under 2-/5-shot adaptation. Despite using only a few labeled target images and no source data, AdaptiveCDM achieves competitive or superior performance compared with SOTA methods under their respective supervision settings. Ablations and qualitative analyses further substantiate the contribution of each component and the effectiveness of AdaptiveCDM in low-data regimes. Code/models will be available.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

Uncertainty-Weighted Fusion of Image and Synthetic Event for Video Anomaly Detection

Most existing video anomaly detectors rely on RGB frames alone, which limit their ability to capture abrupt or transient motion cues that are critical for identifying anomalous events. We propose Uncertainty Weighted Image Event Fusion (IEF-VAD), a framework that integrates complementary RGB and synthetic motion information through a principled weighting mechanism. The method models the high variance and heavy tailed characteristics of synthetic motion cues with a Student's t likelihood, computes value level inverse variance weights using a Laplace approximation to prevent the image modality from overshadowing motion information, and performs iterative refinement to suppress residual cross modal noise. This formulation provides a more balanced and reliable fusion process compared to cross attention or gating based approaches that often suffer from modality dominance. Without requiring an event camera or frame level annotations, IEF-VAD achieves new state of the art performance on multiple real world anomaly detection benchmarks and remains stable under degradation applied to individual modalities. The results indicate that extracting and integrating complementary motion cues is an effective direction for robust video understanding across diverse environments.

cs.CV↗