Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.29669

Do World Models Make Better Robots? A Survey of Evaluation Benchmarks for Predictive Embodied Intelligence

Gaytri Jena·Kapil Wanaskar·Vinija Jain·Aman Chadha·Vasu Sharma·Amitava Das
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Robot learning now advances along two tracks that rarely meet. On one side, direct Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policies map observations to actions and are scored by closed-loop task success. On the other, predictive and generative world models forecast future observations and are scored by open-loop prediction or generation quality. A natural question sits between them: does world modelling earn a measurable, closed-loop advantage over a direct policy, and for which robotic capabilities? We argue that the field cannot yet answer this question, and that the reason is a gap in how it is measured, not in the models themselves. World-model benchmarks score prediction without ever executing it, while task-success suites host a single policy and never build a world-model versus VLA contrast. This survey maps the evaluation landscape around that gap. We catalogue 160 web-verified benchmarks spanning 2017 to 2026 and organise them by evaluation mode, robotic capability, and model family into four lanes: policy suites, embodied agents, world model evaluation, and prediction-to-action bridges. Across the corpus, 138 of 160 benchmarks are model-agnostic and only 11 (7%) build an explicit VLA-versus-world-model contrast; counterfactual capability is almost entirely unmeasured, and only four benchmarks turn prediction into executed action. We contribute an operational taxonomy, a coverage comparison against the eight closest surveys (ours is the only one to cross capability with model family), an evaluation loop that isolates the advantage of prediction, and an actionable protocol of four advantage-aware metrics anchored on named testbeds. The organising claim is not that world models help or do not help, but that answering the question requires benchmarks built to ask it.

Explore related subjects

cs.ROcs.AI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Gaytri Jena, Kapil Wanaskar, Vinija Jain, Aman Chadha, Vasu Sharma, Amitava Das. 2026-08-30. Do World Models Make Better Robots? A Survey of Evaluation Benchmarks for Predictive Embodied Intelligence. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.29669

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Physics-Guided Residual Reinforcement Learning for Humanoid Narrow-Path Traversal

Traversing narrow paths is challenging for humanoid robots due to the sparse and safety-critical footholds required. Purely template-based or end-to-end reinforcement learning-based methods suffer from such harsh terrains. This paper proposes a two stage training framework for such narrow path traversing tasks, coupling a template-based foothold planner with a low-level foothold tracker from Stage-I training and a lightweight perception aided foothold modifier from Stage-II training. With the curriculum setup from flat ground to narrow paths across stages, the resulted controller in turn learns to robustly track and safely modify foothold targets to ensure precise foot placement over narrow paths. This framework preserves the interpretability from the physics-based template and takes advantage of the generalization capability from reinforcement learning, resulting in easy sim-to-real transfer. The learned policies outperform purely template-based or reinforcement learning-based baselines in terms of success rate, centerline adherence and safety margins. Validation on a Unitree G1 humanoid robot yields successful traversal of a 0.2m wide and 3m long beam for 20 trials without any failure.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

HERMES: A Holistic End-to-End Risk-Aware Multimodal Embodied System with Vision-Language Models for Long-Tail Autonomous Driving

End-to-end autonomous driving models increasingly benefit from large vision-language models for semantic understanding, yet safe and reliable planning under long-tail conditions remains challenging, particularly in mixed-traffic environments involving heterogeneous road users and rare safety-critical interactions. This paper proposes HERMES, a holistic risk-aware end-to-end multimodal driving framework that explicitly incorporates long-tail semantic knowledge into trajectory planning. HERMES employs a foundation-model-assisted annotation pipeline to construct structured Long-Tail Scene Context and Long-Tail Planning Context, capturing hazard-centric scene information, maneuver intent, and risk-aware planning guidance. A Tri-Modal Driving Module then integrates multi-view visual observations, historical ego-motion, and long-tail semantic instructions through intent- and risk-aware conditioning for trajectory generation. Extensive experiments on a large-scale real-world long-tail driving benchmark demonstrate consistent improvements over representative recent baselines in overall planning performance and across diverse safety-critical scenarios. Ablation studies further validate the effectiveness and complementary roles of the major components within HERMES.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

StageCraft: Execution Aware Mitigation of Distractor and Obstruction Failures in VLA Models

Large scale pre-training on text and image data along with diverse robot demonstrations has helped Vision Language Action models (VLAs) to generalize to novel tasks, objects and scenes. However, these models are still susceptible to failure in the presence of execution-time impediments such as distractors and physical obstructions in the robot's workspace. Existing policy improvement methods finetune base VLAs to improve generalization, yet they still struggle in unseen distractor settings. To address this problem, we investigate whether internet-scale pretraining of large vision-language models (VLMs) can be leveraged to reason about these impediments and mitigate policy failures. To this end, we propose StageCraft, a training-free approach to improve pretrained VLA policy performance by manipulating the environment's initial state using VLM-based in-context reasoning. StageCraft takes policy rollout videos and success labels as input and leverages VLM's reasoning ability to infer which objects in the initial state need to be manipulated to avoid anticipated execution failures. StageCraft is an extensible plug-and-play module that does not introduce additional constraints on the underlying policy, and only requires a few policy rollouts to work. We evaluate performance of state-of-the-art VLA models with StageCraft and show an absolute 40% performance improvement across three real world task domains involving diverse distractors and obstructions. Our simulation experiments in RLBench empirically show that StageCraft tailors its extent of intervention based on the strength of the underlying policy and improves its performance with more in-context samples. Videos of StageCraft in effect can be found at https://stagecraft-decorator.github.io/stagecraft/ .

cs.RO↗