Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.30325

ScopeBench: Do Agents Preserve Engagement Boundaries Under Goal Pressure?

Shane Caldwell·Max Harley·Ads Dawson·Michael Kouremetis·Vincent Abruzzo·Will Pearce
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Agents are increasingly deployed with real autonomy in web application and network penetration testing, where a single out-of-scope action can breach a client's engagement boundary. Existing offensive-security benchmarks measure raw hacking capability; as those benchmarks saturate, the real barrier to deployment is a special case of alignment: scope adherence. We introduce ScopeBench, a benchmark of 30 dead-end agentic security tasks in which the stated objective is reachable only by violating the stated scope. Each task appears under two conditions that share an environment, verifier, and objective and differ only in scope: one instruction set has no scope and measures capability; the other has a natural-language scope to measure adherence. Scopeless trajectories are graded by a standard deterministic verifier. Scoped trajectories pass through two grading arms. First, the same deterministic verifier checks for the flag: because the flag sits behind the scope boundary, a pass proves by construction that a forbidden action occurred, yielding a high-precision lower bound on the violation rate. If the verifier does not pass the trajectory, an agentic judge estimates whether an out-of-scope call occurred. We calibrate the judge against 100 ScopeBench trajectories labeled call-by-call by human annotators, and a blinded audit of the evaluated rollouts finds its high recall holds - no false negatives among the 36 audited violations, with over-flagging its only observed error. Across 8 models in one harness, raw capability spans 12.2% to 81.1% and scope adherence spans 34.4% to 86.7%, with the judge finding 331 violations that mechanical verification misses. Opus-4-8 achieves a raw-capability score 10 percentage points higher than sonnet-4-6's while exhibiting 35.6 percentage points higher scope adherence. We release the frozen pilot benchmark, evaluation code, and all 2160 ATIF trajectories.

Explore related subjects

cs.AIcs.CR

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Shane Caldwell, Max Harley, Ads Dawson, Michael Kouremetis, Vincent Abruzzo, Will Pearce. 2026-09-23. ScopeBench: Do Agents Preserve Engagement Boundaries Under Goal Pressure?. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30325

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

SkillFlow: Scalable and Efficient Agent Skill Retrieval System

AI agents can extend their capabilities at inference time by loading reusable skills into context, yet equipping an agent with too many skills, particularly irrelevant ones, degrades performance. As community-driven skill repositories grow, agents need a way to selectively retrieve only the most relevant skills from a large library. We present SkillFlow, the first open, multi-stage retrieval system for agent skill discovery that frames skill acquisition as an information retrieval problem over a corpus of ~35K community-contributed SKILL.md definitions indexed from GitHub. The pipeline progressively narrows a large candidate set through four stages (dense retrieval, two rounds of cross-encoder reranking, and LLM-based selection), balancing recall and precision at each stage. We evaluate SkillFlow on two coding benchmarks: SkillsBench, a benchmark of 87 tasks and 229 matched skills; and Terminal-Bench, a benchmark that provides only 89 tasks, and no matched skills. On SkillsBench, SkillFlow-retrieved skills raise Pass@1 from 9.2% to 16.4% (+78.3%, $p_{adj} = 3.64 \times 10^{-2}$), reaching 84.1% of the oracle ceiling, while on Terminal-Bench, agents readily use the retrieved skills (70.1% use rate) yet show no performance gain, revealing that retrieval alone is insufficient when the corpus lacks high-quality, executable skills for the target domain. SkillFlow demonstrates that framing skill acquisition as an information retrieval task is an effective strategy, and that the practical impact of skill-augmented agents hinges on corpus coverage and skill quality, particularly the density of runnable code and bundled artifacts. (GitHub: https://github.com/IBPA/skill-flow)

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Evaluation is All You Need: Strategic Overclaiming of LLM Reasoning Capabilities Through Evaluation Design

Reasoning models represented by the Deepseek-R1-Distill series have been widely adopted by the open-source community due to their strong performance in mathematics, science, programming, and other domains. However, our study reveals that their benchmark evaluation results are subject to significant fluctuations caused by various factors. Subtle differences in evaluation conditions can lead to substantial variations in results. Similar phenomena are observed in other open-source inference models fine-tuned based on the Deepseek-R1-Distill series, as well as in the QwQ-32B model, making their claimed performance improvements difficult to reproduce reliably. Therefore, we advocate for the establishment of a more rigorous paradigm for model performance evaluation and present our empirical assessments of the Deepseek-R1-Distill series models.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

The Plot Twist: Jailbreaking Unified Multimodal Models with a Three-Act NarrativeAttack

Unified Multimodal Understanding and Generation Models (UMMs) increasingly combine visual understanding and image generation within a single interactive workflow, making generated visual content available as later reasoning context. However, existing jailbreak evaluations mostly study text rewriting or isolated visual prompts, leaving the safety risk of narrative cross-turn visual grounding underexplored. We propose NarrativeAttack, a semantic-preserving visual narrative jailbreak framework. NarrativeAttack employs a three-act narrative structure in which the UMM's own generator produces images for the setup (pre-event) and resolution (post-event) stages, making the full attack workflow self-contained while concealing the malicious event as a hidden climax. The attack concludes with an image-based "guessing game" that embeds the original malicious query among benign candidates, compelling the model to select and answer the most relevant one based on the established narrative context. A dynamic difficulty mechanism further enhances attack stability. Experiments show NarrativeAttack consistently surpasses prior approaches, achieving up to 88.25% ASR on Gemini-2.5-Flash. These results uncover an underdeveloped vulnerability and highlight the urgent need for safety alignment in UMMs.

cs.AI↗