Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.30747

Beyond the Last Truffula Tree: SustainAI - A Water-Aware, Closed-Loop Framework for Environmentally Accountable AI

Farnaz Farid·Tashfia Towkee·Sania Nasreen·Sami bin Azad
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes embedded in everyday life, its environmental footprint, particularly water consumption remains largely invisible. While energy and carbon impacts are widely recognized, the substantial freshwater demands of data center cooling and electricity generation receive little attention. To address this gap, we introduce SustainAI, a water-aware, closed-loop framework incorporating environmental accountability into AI deployment. SustainAI integrates real-time water metering, a hallucination-aware penalty model, and a water-aware routing algorithm that accounts for regional water stress. Evaluated via Small Language Models (SLMs) extracting health misinformation, results reveal an 11-fold variation in water footprint across geographically distributed data centers (0.0477 mL to 0.5360 mL per inference). Across 1,335 inference runs, the system consumed approximately 399 mL of water but produced only 240 correct outputs, demonstrating that substantial resources are spent on inaccurate responses. Crucially, SustainAI extends beyond technical optimization through a Care by Design lens, framing AI sustainability around relational ethics, regional equity, and ecological stewardship. By combining water monitoring, adaptive accountability, and Care by Design principles, SustainAI provides a practical foundation for integrating ethical care and environmental responsibility into AI infrastructure design and lifecycle management.

Explore related subjects

cs.CYcs.AIcs.DCcs.HC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Farnaz Farid, Tashfia Towkee, Sania Nasreen, Sami bin Azad. 2026-09-25. Beyond the Last Truffula Tree: SustainAI - A Water-Aware, Closed-Loop Framework for Environmentally Accountable AI. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30747

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Initial results of the Digital Consciousness Model

Artificially intelligent systems have become remarkably sophisticated. They hold conversations, write essays, and seem to understand context in ways that surprise even their creators. This raises a crucial question: Are we creating systems that are conscious? The Digital Consciousness Model (DCM) is a first attempt to assess the evidence for consciousness in AI systems in a systematic, probabilistic way. It provides a shared framework for comparing different AIs and biological organisms, and for tracking how the evidence changes over time as AI develops. Instead of adopting a single theory of consciousness, it incorporates a range of leading theories and perspectives - acknowledging that experts disagree fundamentally about what consciousness is and what conditions are necessary for it. This report describes the structure and initial results of the Digital Consciousness Model. Overall, we find that the evidence is against 2024 LLMs being conscious, but the evidence against 2024 LLMs being conscious is not decisive. The evidence against LLM consciousness is much weaker than the evidence against consciousness in simpler AI systems.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

Efficient Safety Benchmarking via Item Response Theory

Safety benchmarks for language models are typically evaluated using static paradigms that treat all items as equally informative for all models, an assumption that is particularly problematic for adversarial, highly heterogeneous safety items. Applied in full to modern benchmark suites, current evaluation procedures would require on the order of $10^5$ responses, most of which provide little ranking signal. We analyze six widely used safety benchmarks and make three contributions toward more efficient safety evaluation. First, we show that Item Response Theory (IRT) recovers interpretable structure on safety benchmarks, with ability estimates resolving differences among models that cluster at the ceiling of raw safety metrics. Second, we show that adaptive item selection, which dynamically chooses informative items for each model based on its responses, approximates full-benchmark rankings (Spearman's $ρ>$ 0.90), reducing evaluation cost by at least 80% on every benchmark where this threshold is attainable, and by up to 99.9%, achieved on AIR-Bench 2024. Third, we introduce a practical procedure for extracting a fixed, informative subset of items reusable across models, a static alternative to adaptive selection with savings of 80--99.8% across benchmarks. Together, these results establish that psychometric methods enable benchmark-aware reductions in evaluation costs across the safety evaluation pipeline.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

Large language models underestimate and partly misrepresent cultural variation in everyday norms

A key aspect of culture is a society's norms about everyday behavior. How accurately do large language models (LLMs) represent cultural differences in such norms? To answer this question we used the recent Global Study of Everyday Norms (GSEN), which collected ratings of 150 scenarios in 90 societies, as the human benchmark. We prompted GPT-5 to estimate each society's average rating for every scenario, and later repeated the benchmark in three other LLMs: GPT-5.4, Claude Opus 4.6, and Gemini 3.1 Pro. Compared to GSEN estimates, all four LLMs misrepresented cultural variation in two ways. First, they greatly underestimated its magnitude, estimating differences between societies to be, on average, less than half their measured size. Second, for many scenarios the LLMs poorly identified the pattern of variation, that is, which societies judged the behavior less acceptable and which societies judged it more acceptable. The pattern of variation was identified better for scenarios that elicit concerns about vulgarity, especially scenarios involving kissing and flirting. We also found that norms in more developed societies tended to be estimated somewhat more accurately, and that prompting in local survey languages rather than English produced only a modest improvement in accuracy. Local-language prompting also reduced, but did not remove, the underestimation of between-society differences. Cultural differences in everyday norms are only weakly and unevenly represented by LLMs.

cs.CY↗