arXiv · 2609.32643
Business Compromise Detection with Agentic AI and LLM-driven Knowledge Discovery
Abstract
Detecting compromised business ad accounts is a challenge in digital advertising, as attackers exploit hijacked accounts to launch fraudulent campaigns. Large Language Model (LLM) agents show promise for integrity enforcement, but hallucinated mistakes on hard cases create business friction. In a study we find the autonomous agent is a strong, recall-heavy signal extractor but an unreliable final arbiter, conceding precision on ambiguous decisions. We therefore keep the agent as an investigator that emits a structured, interpretable signal vector, and delegate the verdict to a neuro-symbolic stage: symbolic rules discovered by Inductive Logic Programming (FOIL-IE), a Naïve Bayes calibration layer, and a data-tuned contradiction layer. Evaluating on a compromise-over-sampled population and a realistic low-prevalence sample with subject-matter-expert labels, this arbiter substitution raises MCC from 0.295 to 0.435 (ΔMCC +0.139, 95% CI [+0.026, +0.245], p=0.018, paired bootstrap), lifting precision from 0.250 to 0.446 (1.8x) at a recall cost (0.920 to 0.660). Benchmarked under identical conditions, it also edge tree ensembles (0.386).The rules encode domain w labels while remaininginterpretable and auditable.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Diego Palma, Kyu Bin Kim, Zhen Han, Allbright Dsouza, Zhiyuan Liu. 2026-09-26. Business Compromise Detection with Agentic AI and LLM-driven Knowledge Discovery. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.32643
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.