Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2609.35448

AI-based matching improves refugee employment in a double-blind randomized trial

Abstract

Refugee integration is a central policy challenge for host countries, and where governments initially place refugees shapes their integration trajectories. Yet placement officers often have limited information about where each case is most likely to succeed. Algorithmic refugee matching uses administrative data, machine learning, and constrained optimization to recommend employment-optimized placements in real time as cases arrive, with human placement officers retaining final authority. Between January 2020 and June 2023, the Swiss State Secretariat for Migration randomly assigned about 2,000 refugee cases to receive a canton recommendation either algorithmically optimized for employment or drawn to approximate existing procedures, with placement officers and refugees blinded to assignment. The two arms used identical but separate canton and origin-group quotas, so gains reflect better refugee-canton matching rather than reallocation toward stronger labor markets. The trial began just before the COVID-19 pandemic shifted labor-market conditions. For the pre-registered primary outcome -- the share of months employed during the first three years -- the pooled intention-to-treat (ITT) estimate across the 2020-2023 placement cohorts was +2.2 percentage points (about 10% of the 22.3% control mean; 95% CI [+0.05, +4.33]), rising to +3.9 pp (about 17%; [+1.11, +6.68]) for the post-COVID 2022-2023 cohorts. Effects grew over time: at 36 months, the pooled ITT on the employment rate was +5.2 pp (about 11%; 95% CI [+1.10, +9.25]) -- comparable to the gains from hundreds of hours of intensive language training. Overall, the results provide rare field evidence that AI-based decision support can improve high-stakes public-sector allocation, offering a scalable, low-cost way to raise refugee employment.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kirk Bansak, Jens Hainmueller, Dominik Hangartner, Jeremy Ferwerda, Elisabeth Paulson, Angie Delevoye, Nicholas Adams-Cohen, Ashwin Ramaswami, Selina Kurer, Joelle Pianzola, Michael Hotard. 2026-09-28. AI-based matching improves refugee employment in a double-blind randomized trial. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.35448

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Why China Succeeds: A Road to Prosperity

Why China Succeeds offers what no existing book does: a single, unified explanatory framework that traces China's rise from its ancient civilizational foundations to its twenty first century technological ascent. Rather than treating China's success as ideologically exceptional or historically accidental, it reveals the universal institutional logic (regulated social mobility, functional land and taxation systems, and formidable state capability) that has sustained Chinese governance across millennia and powered its modern economic miracle. The book directly challenges Western development orthodoxy by demonstrating that institutions can be built through growth, not before it. For policymakers, scholars, and development practitioners worldwide seeking transferable lessons from the world's most consequential development story, this book provides the most historically grounded, analytically rigorous, and forward-looking account available.

econ.GN↗

Two Margins of Climate Cooperation: Emissions and Coalition Membership under Tipping

We study climate coalition stability with endogenous temperature and stochastic tipping. In our dynamic game, rising temperature widens the emissions gap between members and nonmembers, shrinking stable coalitions over time. The threat of tipping strengthens free-riding, raising emissions and reducing coalition size; its occurrence also contracts coalitions numerically. Advanced regions form the core, while emerging & developing regions drive membership variation. Comparing policy instruments, connection (internal incentives) and sanctions (external penalties) sustain similar coalitions, but connection raises aggregate payoffs, whereas sanctions achieve larger emissions cuts. As tipping approaches, this trade-off intensifies, making the optimal institutional design state-dependent.

econ.GN↗

New Demand Economics: Education, Demand Upgrading, and Structural Change

Education can change what households buy as well as what workers produce. We study this demand channel in a two-sector growth model. Education shifts spending toward an education-sensitive bundle, drawing labor into the sector that supplies it. Learning lowers its relative price. When substitution between the bundles is strong enough, the price decline raises its expenditure share and reinforces the initial shift. The balance between this feedback and technological catch-up determines the long-run allocation. Weak feedback gives a unique stable configuration. Strong feedback can sustain two stable configurations with different expenditure shares, so the long-run outcome depends on initial productivity. A sufficiently large, attainable increase in education removes the low-share configuration. This transition can occur through demand alone, without a direct productivity effect of education. Early consumption commitments can also change the economy's destination, even though their budget share eventually vanishes. The growth and welfare consequences depend on learning gained in the expanding sector and learning forgone in the other. We derive the net learning benefit that a planner would attach to reallocation.

econ.GN↗