Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2609.39887

Generalized Prophet Inequalities for Online Auctions

Abstract

Prophet Inequalities for online auctions, as many classical auction settings, traditionally consider agents who strive to maximize quasi-linear utility, i.e. their obtained value minus the price paid. This simplified view of the agents' objectives does not capture real-world settings where agents are almost always constrained by budgets, and can have different objectives altogether (e.g., very prominently, value maximizers in autobidding). We generalize classic prophet inequality auction settings to accommodate unknown, varying types of agent objectives and budgets, modeling them as stochastic input similar to the traditional valuation distributions. In this new model, we analyze (anonymous) posted-price mechanisms, one main category of which are the balanced prices central to many auction results in the prophet inequality model. We demonstrate both the resilience and limits of balanced price mechanisms for generalized prophet inequalities with stochastic agent objectives, budgets and valuations: our generalization of the balanced prices framework incorporates budget constraints and mixed objectives. We show constant competitive ratios for some the most central settings, spanning all the way up to agents with subadditive valuation functions. On the way, we establish trade-offs between competitive ratio and agents' price-sensitivity, and give a general reduction from the budgeted setting to budget-free value maximizers.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Twan Kroll, Rebecca Reiffenhäuser. 2026-09-30. Generalized Prophet Inequalities for Online Auctions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.39887

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Adverse Effects of V2V Adoption on Road Safety

Vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communication is expected to improve road safety and reduce congestion. However, prior work shows that V2V information sharing under partial adoption may increase congestion and decrease safety. We study whether increasing V2V adoption itself affects road safety. We propose a corrected version of an existing model and analyze its behavior under varying adoption levels. We show that, in some cases, increased V2V adoption can increase accident probability. However, under an optimal signaling policy, the system can ensure that accident probability is non-increasing in the adoption level.

cs.GT↗

Anytime Contracts for AI Services

AI services are prone to moral hazard, as model providers can silently route requests to cheaper, lower-quality models, and the inherent stochasticity of model outputs makes this degradation hard to detect. Contract theory addresses moral hazard by designing payment rules that reward high-quality outputs and prevent strategic overcharging. However, existing frameworks assume interactions of fixed duration, whereas AI services are typically consumed through subscriptions and pay-as-you-go APIs that users can terminate at any time based on observed performance. We show that this flexibility can break standard contracts, opening them up to abuse by either the providers or users. To address this, we extend contract theory to account for unknown exit rules. We formalize the problem as a Principal-Agent game, and show that budget-optimal contracts in this setting are proportional to anytime-valid hypothesis tests based on likelihood-ratio e-values. We give an efficient algorithm for computing anytime contracts and show how betting e-processes can be used to approximate them when the models are unknown. Finally, we evaluate our findings on synthetic data and data from deployed LLMs.

cs.GT↗

Optimally Curating an Event

We study the optimal design of a self-financing event, a problem that requires balancing the recruitment of costly, positive-value participants with revenue-generating agents who may impose negative values on the event. We introduce a novel two-sided mechanism design framework with plus agents equipped with private costs and positive impact, and minus agents with private values and negative impact upon inclusion in the event, to maximize the overall quality of the event under a budget-balanced (BB) constraint so that the designer does not run a deficit. We conduct a comprehensive study on the theory of optimal event curation on various utility functions. For additive utility, we fully characterize the optimal incentive-compatible Bayesian mechanism under both the ex-ante and ex-post BB constraints. For submodular utility, we propose an ex-ante BB mechanism that achieves a constant-factor approximation to the optimal Bayesian mechanism.

cs.GT↗