arXiv · 2609.39901
Do Better Goal Representations Improve Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning?
Abstract
Goal-conditioned reinforcement learning (GCRL) relies heavily on how target goals are represented to the policy. While recent methods encode goals via temporal distance, occupancy, or controllability, it remains unclear how much downstream performance actually depends on representation quality. We study this in offline GCRL by constructing an exact temporal-distance goal representation in deterministic mazes. We then systematically corrupt its geometric quality while keeping the downstream learner fixed. Across OGBench navigation tasks and two algorithms, large changes in goal-representation quality produce almost no change in performance. However, applying the same interventions to the agent's current state more than doubles success, revealing the state pathway as the true bottleneck. Building on this insight, we show that simple random Fourier positional encodings substantially improve performance on the hardest navigation tasks without map information or objective modifications. Overall, our findings suggest that in state-based offline navigation, improving how the agent's current state is represented matters far more than refining the goal representation. Code will be released soon.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Syed Nazmus Sakib, Abdul Monaf Chowdhury, Nafiul Haque, Shifat E Arman, Md Mehedi Hasan. 2026-09-30. Do Better Goal Representations Improve Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning?. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.39901
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.