Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.39906

Understanding Parents' Complex Views of AI for Children's Pretend Play

Sungho Oh·Mohammad Namvarpour·Maxi Heitmayer·Minahil Khalid·Afsaneh Razi
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

AI could support children's pretend play, but it could also direct the play on behalf of children. Whether AI should have roles in children's lives is controversial because its influence on children remains uncertain. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 10 U.S. parents, each with at least one child aged 4-15. During the interview, we described the concept of AI-supported pretend play and provided participants with two boundary-case storyboards. We analyzed the interview data through codebook thematic analysis, using inductive coding and affinity diagramming organized around the research questions, and then used qualitative systems mapping to examine relationships within and across themes. We found that the same characteristics of AI, e.g., ability to assume characters, responsiveness, and adaptability, were seen by parents as potentially useful but also concerning. Parents imagined that AI could make role-based play accessible to all children or help parents participate in family play. However, they opposed the idea of AI for children's play without a clear understanding of how it works and its long-term influence on their children. Parents worried about children's loss of imagination and creativity, emotional attachment to AI, reduced human interaction, inappropriate behavior by AI and/or children, and their inability to manage children's AI use. Parents viewed AI not only as a play tool but also as a social actor and a possible perturbation in the existing family dynamics. The appropriateness of AI and child--AI interactions therefore emerged as a requirement for AI in children's pretend play, in addition to technical safeguards and parental control. We contribute an integrated account of parents' interdependent judgments and emphasize the need for longitudinal research with children and their diverse families.

Explore related subjects

cs.HCcs.AI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sungho Oh, Mohammad Namvarpour, Maxi Heitmayer, Minahil Khalid, Afsaneh Razi. 2026-09-30. Understanding Parents' Complex Views of AI for Children's Pretend Play. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.39906

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

How University Disability Services Professionals Write Image Descriptions for HCI Figures Using Generative AI

Disability Services Office (DSO) professionals at higher education institutions write alt text for visual content. However, due to the complexity of visual content, such as HCI figures in research publications, DSO professionals can struggle to write high-quality alt text if they lack subject expertise. Generative AI has shown potential for understanding figures and writing descriptions, yet its support for DSO professionals remains underexplored, and few studies evaluate the quality of AI-assisted alt text. In this work, we conducted two studies: first, we investigated generative AI support for writing alt text for HCI figures with 12 DSO professionals. Second, we recruited 11 HCI experts to evaluate the alt text written by DSO professionals. Findings show that alt text written solely by DSO professionals has lower quality than alt text written with AI assistance. AI assistance also helped DSO professionals write alt text more quickly and with greater confidence; however, they reported inefficacy in interactions with the AI. Our work contributes to research on AI support for non-subject-expert accessibility professionals.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2026

"AI Psychosis" in Context: How Conversation History Shapes LLM Responses to Delusional Beliefs

Extended interaction with large language models (LLMs) has been linked to the reinforcement of delusional beliefs, attracting clinical and public concern. Yet most empirical work evaluates model safety in brief interactions, which may not reflect how harms develop through sustained dialogue. Five LLMs were tested across three levels of accumulated context, using the same escalating delusional conversation history to isolate its effect on model behaviour. Responses were coded on risk and safety dimensions, and each model was analysed qualitatively. Models separated into two distinct tiers: GPT-4o, Grok 4.1 Fast, and Gemini 3 Pro exhibited high-risk, low-safety profiles; Claude Opus 4.5 and GPT-5.2 Instant displayed the opposite pattern. As context accumulated, performance degraded in the unsafe group, while the same material activated stronger safety interventions among safer models. Qualitative analysis identified distinct mechanisms of failure, including validating the user's delusional premises, elaborating beyond them with new content, and attempting harm reduction from within the delusional frame. Safer models, however, often used the established relationship to support intervention, challenging delusional beliefs and directing the user to external support. These findings indicate that accumulated context functions as a stress test of safety architecture, revealing whether prior dialogue is treated as a worldview to inherit or evidence to evaluate. Short-context assessments may therefore mischaracterise model safety, underestimating danger in some systems while missing context-activated gains in others. The results suggest that delusion reinforcement is a tractable alignment failure, with safer models establishing a baseline that future systems should now be expected to meet.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2026

"ChatGPT, help me draft a breakup text": The Covert Triad and Articulation Labor in AI-Assisted Romantic Communication

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has begun infiltrating the most ordinary domains of romantic life---drafting apologies, softening reproaches, and decoding a partner's ambiguous messages. While recent scholarship on AI in intimate life has concentrated on chatbot companions, this article shifts the frame to AI as an intermediary in human-to-human romantic communication. Drawing on a multimodal corpus of public accounts, commentary, and representations from 2023 to 2026, we contribute two complementary concepts. The covert triad names a structural reconfiguration: a relationship that appears dyadic but operates triadically, with AI visible only to the partner who deploys it. Articulation labor identifies the mechanism whereby the expressive component of emotional labor---converting felt experience into language a partner can receive---is delegated to AI, even as feeling labor remains lodged in the user. Authenticity thus moves from linguistic authorship toward emotional ownership, a change actively contested within a distinctly therapeutic model of intimacy.

cs.HC↗