Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.03102

Ask, Relax, or Act? Evaluating Actionable Indeterminacy in LLM Preference Reasoning

Ang Li·Yue Lin·Feifei Kou·Zhan Su·Prayag Tiwari·Wenhao Li·Shuhui Zhu·Hongyuan Zha·Baoxiang Wang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

An LLM agent can recognize uncertainty yet still choose the wrong next step: asking when action is already justified, or seeking clarification when the constraints must change. We formalize actionable indeterminacy: act when an accepted action is shared across all admissible preferences or objectives, clarify when each possibility is feasible but no action is shared, and propose a minimum-cost permitted constraint repair when the request is infeasible. We construct a solver-grounded benchmark spanning object allocation, meeting scheduling, apartment choice, and stable matching. Matched pairs retain the same source while changing whether intervention is necessary, and evaluation separates decision correctness, matched-pair reliability, and fully correct responses. Our findings reveal a recurring difficulty in recognizing when intervention is unnecessary: models can identify situations requiring clarification or repair yet still intervene when a justified action already exists. Correct decision labels also fail to guarantee usable actions, questions, or repairs. Crucially, response requirements shape not only how decisions are expressed but also which decisions are made. Making the required content explicit substantially improves fully correct responses and can change intervention decisions, even when outputs are already parseable. These findings highlight that reliable agency requires more than recognizing uncertainty: it requires intervening only when necessary and translating the chosen next step into a verifiable response.

Explore related subjects

cs.CLcs.AI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ang Li, Yue Lin, Feifei Kou, Zhan Su, Prayag Tiwari, Wenhao Li, Shuhui Zhu, Hongyuan Zha, Baoxiang Wang. 2026-10-02. Ask, Relax, or Act? Evaluating Actionable Indeterminacy in LLM Preference Reasoning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.03102

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

ETHER: Aligning Emergent Communication for Hindsight Experience Replay

Hindsight Experience Replay (HER) enhances sample efficiency in goal-conditioned reinforcement learning (RL) by relabelling failed trajectories with goals that were actually achieved. However, HER implicitly assumes access to a goal relabelling function and a predicate function that determines whether a goal has been satisfied. These assumptions break down in instruction-following tasks, where goals are expressed in natural language and differ from the state space. We formalize this as the Hindsight Reinforcement Learning problem, which shows the need to jointly learn these functions alongside the RL policy. To address it, we propose ETHER (Emergent Textual Hindsight Experience Replay), an agent that leverages Emergent Communication to learn the goal-relabelling and predicate functions. ETHER uses a referential game (RG) to train a speaker and a listener to develop a grounded, artificial language describing environment states. It partially aligns this emergent language with instruction language using co-occurrence patterns between task instructions and RL observations. We prove that the relabelling and predicate functions that ETHER derives from the RG avoid the degenerate solutions of the Hindsight RL problem, namely trivial predicates and collapsed relabelling functions. Experiments on BabyAI's PickupDist task show that ETHER's learned RG speaker and listener can function as the goal relabelling and predicate functions of HER, improving sample efficiency despite imperfect language alignment. Our work bridges Emergent Communication and goal-conditioned RL, opening the door to wider applications of HER.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Automatic register identification for the open web using multilingual deep learning

This article presents multilingual deep learning models for identifying web registers -- text varieties such as news reports and discussion forums -- across 16 languages. We introduce the Multilingual CORE corpora, which contain over 72,000 documents annotated with a hierarchical taxonomy of 25 registers designed to cover the entire open web. Using multi-label classification, our best model achieves 79% F1 averaged across languages, matching or exceeding previous studies that used simpler classification schemes. This demonstrates that models can perform well even with a complex register scheme at multilingual scale. However, we observe a consistent performance ceiling across all models and configurations. When we remove documents with uncertain labels through data pruning, performance increases to over 90% F1, suggesting that this ceiling stems from inherent ambiguity in web registers rather than model limitations. Analysis of hybrid texts (those combining multiple registers) reveals that the main challenge lies not in classifying hybrids themselves, but in distinguishing hybrid from non-hybrid documents. Multilingual models consistently outperform monolingual ones, particularly for languages with limited training data. Zero-shot performance on unseen languages drops by an average of 7%, though this varies by language (3--8%), indicating that while registers share features across languages, they also retain language-specific characteristics.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Evaluating the Retrieval Robustness of Large Language Models

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) generally enhances large language models' (LLMs) ability to solve knowledge-intensive tasks. But RAG could also lead to performance degradation due to imperfect retrieval and the model's limited ability to leverage retrieved content. In this work, we evaluate the robustness of LLMs in practical RAG setups (henceforth retrieval robustness). We focus on three research questions: (1) whether RAG is always better than non-RAG; (2) whether more retrieved documents always lead to better performance; and (3) whether document order impacts results. To facilitate this study, we establish a benchmark of 1,891 samples spanning five datasets across three task categories, each with documents retrieved using both sparse and dense retrievers. We introduce three robustness metrics, each corresponding to one research question. Our experiments across 11 LLMs show that models achieve generally high retrieval robustness, but robustness varies substantially across tasks, suggesting that the decision to adopt RAG remains a case-by-case consideration. We further examine four additional prompting strategies that vary how models interact with retrieved documents. We find that Qwen and GPT models suffer notable robustness declines when reasoning is disabled, even on single-hop QA tasks, and that providing retrieved documents as tool responses improves Claude models but hurts Qwen and GPT models, highlighting potential issues of the GPT models regardless of their best overall robustness under vanilla prompting.

cs.CL↗