arXiv · 2610.05298
Revisiting Ground-Truth Synthesis from High-Speed Video: Exact Validity Conditions and an Audited Consumer Capture Corpus
Abstract
Motion-deblurring datasets are commonly synthesised by averaging $N$ consecutive high-frame-rate frames and labelling the result with the central frame. We show that this label is unbiased for every capture timing only when the window is odd and the frames' sample durations are equal. An even window shifts every label by a fixed fraction of the blur length, even under perfect timing. Unequal durations are subtler: their mean misalignment is zero, so dataset statistics cannot reveal them, yet when the offset cannot be read from the blur they convolve the supervision rather than adding noise to it. Auditing 51 smartphone clips recorded at a nominal 240 fps, we find 19 captured near 176 fps, a behaviour recorded only in the container's timing tables. In a controlled test the parity choice costs a fitted linear deblurring filter far more than these timing irregularities do, and interpolation labels, unlike blur labels, can be repaired with the true frame times. We provide a tool that checks both conditions without decoding, and will release the clips and their timing tables.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Abdullah Al Shafi, Sumaiya Rahim Suma. 2026-10-04. Revisiting Ground-Truth Synthesis from High-Speed Video: Exact Validity Conditions and an Audited Consumer Capture Corpus. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.05298
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.