Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.05486

Surrogate-powered Causal Inference with Censored Outcomes

Abstract

Clinical trials with survival endpoints lose information when participants are censored before death is observed. We develop target-preserving estimators that use posttreatment disease history, such as recurrence or progression, to recover information lost to censoring for marginal survival and restricted mean survival effects. The difficulty is that the intermediate event is downstream of treatment: naive adjustment can change the causal estimand, and the useful information enters only through the observed coarsening. We derive observed-data influence functions with and without recurrence history and obtain an exact gain identity. The identity shows that efficiency improvement is driven by the censoring hazard, the split of the alive risk set into recurrence states, and the residual-survival separation between those states. In the no-covariate illness-death model, the Aalen-Johansen estimator realizes the recurrence-augmented efficient score after standardization to the marginal target. With covariates, correctly specified Cox-Breslow transition hazards provide a root-N plug-in benchmark, while a hazard-induced one-step estimator gives rate robustness and, under primitive transition and censoring learner rates, canonical inference with a second-order product remainder. A semi-synthetic metastatic breast cancer study calibrated from digitized progression-free survival and overall survival curves illustrates the gain identity. The framework applies broadly to censored time-to-event studies with informative intermediate histories.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yaroslav Mukhin, Tereza Oprea, Arielle Anderer, Christina Lee Yu, Jelena Bradic. 2026-10-04. Surrogate-powered Causal Inference with Censored Outcomes. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.05486

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Construction of optimal tests for symmetry on the torus and their quantitative error bounds

In this paper, we investigate the general problem of assessing symmetry in data points on the hyper-dimensional torus, a question that originally emerged in applications from bioinformatics and directional statistics. We develop optimal tests for symmetry for both scenarios where the center of symmetry is known and where it is unknown. Our new tests are not only valid under a given parametric hypothesis but also under a very broad class of symmetric distributions. The asymptotic behavior of the proposed tests is studied both under the null hypothesis and local alternatives. A key contribution of our paper is that we accompany our asymptotic results with error guarantees by deriving quantitative bounds on the distributional distance between the exact (unknown) distribution of the test statistic and its asymptotic counterpart by leveraging Stein's method. The finite-sample performance of the tests is evaluated through simulation studies, and their practical utility in bioinformatics is demonstrated via an application to protein folding data.

math.ST↗

Axioms for testing with data-dependent levels, e-values and p-values

The emerging literature on hypothesis testing with data-dependent and post-hoc significance levels relies on a particular extension of the Type-I error to data-dependent levels. Existing arguments for this extension are heuristic, and primarily motivated by a resulting connection to the e-value. Our first contribution is to show that it is uniquely characterized by three axioms: law-invariance, calibration to classical testing, and a mixing axiom. Inspired by a combination of Birnbaum's conditionality principle and Savage's sure-thing principle, the mixing axiom assumes that a test produced by randomly selecting between (in)valid tests must be (in)valid. Our second contribution is to show that three analogous axioms characterize the e-value as a continuous generalization of a test in a decision-theoretic framework. We recover the p-value by dropping part of the mixing axiom, showing that e-values correspond to those p-values for which a random choice between two invalid p-values cannot lead to a valid p-value. Finally, we show that the relationship between e-values and post-hoc testing goes through under much weaker axioms.

math.ST↗

Stochastic Inversion of Multivariate Uniform-Distribution-Preserving Transformations

A multivariate transformation of the unit cube with component transformations that are piecewise continuously differentiable and uniform distribution preserving (udp) is considered. A stochastic inverse transformation is defined using randomization to overcome the non-injective nature of the udp transformations. The inverse transformation preserves the uniform margins of a random vector distributed according to a copula and yields different copulas for different randomizations. A copula density transformation result for the multivariate stochastic inverse is proved and illustrated in the bivariate case.

math.ST↗