Generalized Proximal Policy Optimization: Unifying LLM RL Algorithms from the Perspective of Divergence

Abstract

Reinforcement learning has become the foundational paradigm for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of LLMs. Yet the dominant approach, Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), relies on a geometrically degenerate clipping proxy that cannot adapt its resistance to policy shifts, leading to premature clipping and degraded exploration. Subsequent variants alleviate these issues through fragmented and heuristic modifications. We propose Generalized Proximal Policy Optimization (GPPO), a principled and unified framework for understanding and designing LLM RL algorithms through the lens of divergence. We establish a generalized $f$-divergence trust-region theory with a monotonic performance improvement guarantee, and show that different $f$-divergences induce distinct geometries and policy update dynamics. We further introduce novel estimator topologies that provide more faithful divergence estimates than the conventional single-sample Monte Carlo estimation. Under this framework, PPO and recent variants such as DAPO, DPPO, and RIPO emerge as special cases, establishing a principled two-dimensional design space of {Divergence $\times$ Estimator}. Extensive experiments on eight competition-level math and coding benchmarks show that both dimensions are critical. The best-performing GPPO instantiation surpasses standard GRPO by up to 50% and 14% on math and coding, delivering SOTA performance.