Randomized Experiments with Ambiguous Record Linkage

Bruno Ferman; Lucas Finamor

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.15063

Randomized Experiments with Ambiguous Record Linkage

Bruno Ferman·Lucas Finamor

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Randomized experiments are often linked to administrative data to measure outcomes, but coarse identifiers can leave multiple administrative records consistent with each experimental unit. We show that unbiased estimation of the sample average treatment effect is possible without resolving these ambiguous links or specifying an outcome model. Our key linkage requirement is that the true administrative outcome is contained among the candidate outcomes for each experimental unit. We characterize the precision cost of linkage ambiguity and study two complementary ways to mitigate it: regression adjustment and reweighting based on observed linkage characteristics. We establish finite-sample and asymptotic properties of these estimators and develop valid randomization-based and large-sample inference.

Explore related subjects

econ.EM

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Bruno Ferman, Lucas Finamor. 2026-10-10. Randomized Experiments with Ambiguous Record Linkage. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.15063

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Identification and Inference in proxy-SVARs with non-Gaussian shocks

Two frequent approaches for identifying structural VARs are external instruments, which carry economic content but are often weak, and non-Gaussianity of the shocks, which provides statistical identification but carries no economic meaning. We combine the two strategies in a single generalized method of moments framework. This hybrid approach point-identifies the target shocks while also identifying the non-target shocks up to sign and ordering. Under suitable rank conditions, the higher-order moments of the structural shocks anchor the identification uniformly over the instrument strength. Consequently, under local-to-zero proxy relevance, estimators of the dynamic causal effects remain consistent, and standard asymptotic inference remains valid. Moreover, the Anderson-Rubin confidence sets are substantially narrower than their instrument-only counterparts. The hybrid estimator is also more efficient than either source of identification used in isolation: at any fixed proxy relevance, even a weak instrument increases the efficiency of the estimator through its covariance with the non-Gaussian moment block. Under local deviations from proxy exogeneity, we provide asymptotic bias bounds and show that stronger non-Gaussianity of the shocks compresses the bias. Finally, the over-identified structure yields two mutually orthogonal specification tests for proxy exogeneity and the validity of the higher-order moment conditions. We derive their limiting distributions and provide a bootstrap procedure for finite-sample critical values. Monte Carlo simulations and two applications with identification of oil news-shock and a Euro-area MP shock demonstrate the potential of our framework.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2026

Testing for an Explosive Bubble using High-Frequency Volatility

Based on a continuous-time stochastic volatility model with a linear drift, we develop a test for explosive behavior in financial asset prices at a low frequency when prices are sampled at a higher frequency. The test exploits the volatility information in the high-frequency data. The method consists of devolatizing log-asset price increments with realized volatility measures and performing a supremum-type recursive Dickey-Fuller test on the devolatized sample. The proposed test has a nuisance-parameter-free asymptotic distribution and is easy to implement. We study the size and power properties of the test in Monte Carlo simulations. A real-time date-stamping strategy based on the devolatized sample is proposed for the origination and conclusion dates of the explosive regime. Conditions under which the real-time date-stamping strategy is consistent are established. The test and the date-stamping strategy are applied to study explosive behavior in cryptocurrency and stock markets.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2026

Difference-in-Differences Estimators When No Unit Remains Untreated

We study difference-in-differences designs in which all units are initially untreated and later receive heterogeneous, strictly positive treatment doses. When quasi-untreated units receive doses close to zero, a difference-in-difference estimand using those units as the control group identifies a weighted average treatment effect per unit of treatment, under a parallel-trends assumption. We develop a nonparametric estimator and bias-corrected confidence intervals for this parameter. We also show that the assumptions justifying the usual two-way fixed-effects estimator imply testable linearity restrictions, and propose specification tests that can guide its use.

econ.EM↗