Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.15296

Recurrent Neural Networks for Forecasting Autoregressive Noncausal Processes

Abstract

This paper examines the use of recurrent neural networks and their extensions for forecasting autoregressive causal-noncausal processes, characterized by local explosive patterns such as bubbles and spikes. We study the recurrent neural networks (RNN), long short-term memory networks (LSTM), gated recurrent unit (GRU), bidirectional LSTM, and also a simple feed-forward network (FNN) to reveal the difficulty of forecasting extreme values depending on the type of network and the length of the training set. We show that FNN outperforms other networks in predicting extreme values of a univariate noncausal time series during a bubble. We also examine the improvements of point predictions of extreme values resulting from pooling and a modified loss function.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Joann Jasiak, Cheng Zhong. 2026-10-11. Recurrent Neural Networks for Forecasting Autoregressive Noncausal Processes. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.15296

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Identification and Inference in proxy-SVARs with non-Gaussian shocks

Two frequent approaches for identifying structural VARs are external instruments, which carry economic content but are often weak, and non-Gaussianity of the shocks, which provides statistical identification but carries no economic meaning. We combine the two strategies in a single generalized method of moments framework. This hybrid approach point-identifies the target shocks while also identifying the non-target shocks up to sign and ordering. Under suitable rank conditions, the higher-order moments of the structural shocks anchor the identification uniformly over the instrument strength. Consequently, under local-to-zero proxy relevance, estimators of the dynamic causal effects remain consistent, and standard asymptotic inference remains valid. Moreover, the Anderson-Rubin confidence sets are substantially narrower than their instrument-only counterparts. The hybrid estimator is also more efficient than either source of identification used in isolation: at any fixed proxy relevance, even a weak instrument increases the efficiency of the estimator through its covariance with the non-Gaussian moment block. Under local deviations from proxy exogeneity, we provide asymptotic bias bounds and show that stronger non-Gaussianity of the shocks compresses the bias. Finally, the over-identified structure yields two mutually orthogonal specification tests for proxy exogeneity and the validity of the higher-order moment conditions. We derive their limiting distributions and provide a bootstrap procedure for finite-sample critical values. Monte Carlo simulations and two applications with identification of oil news-shock and a Euro-area MP shock demonstrate the potential of our framework.

econ.EM↗

Testing for an Explosive Bubble using High-Frequency Volatility

Based on a continuous-time stochastic volatility model with a linear drift, we develop a test for explosive behavior in financial asset prices at a low frequency when prices are sampled at a higher frequency. The test exploits the volatility information in the high-frequency data. The method consists of devolatizing log-asset price increments with realized volatility measures and performing a supremum-type recursive Dickey-Fuller test on the devolatized sample. The proposed test has a nuisance-parameter-free asymptotic distribution and is easy to implement. We study the size and power properties of the test in Monte Carlo simulations. A real-time date-stamping strategy based on the devolatized sample is proposed for the origination and conclusion dates of the explosive regime. Conditions under which the real-time date-stamping strategy is consistent are established. The test and the date-stamping strategy are applied to study explosive behavior in cryptocurrency and stock markets.

econ.EM↗

Difference-in-Differences Estimators When No Unit Remains Untreated

We study difference-in-differences designs in which all units are initially untreated and later receive heterogeneous, strictly positive treatment doses. When quasi-untreated units receive doses close to zero, a difference-in-difference estimand using those units as the control group identifies a weighted average treatment effect per unit of treatment, under a parallel-trends assumption. We develop a nonparametric estimator and bias-corrected confidence intervals for this parameter. We also show that the assumptions justifying the usual two-way fixed-effects estimator imply testable linearity restrictions, and propose specification tests that can guide its use.

econ.EM↗