Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.15499

The Imperishable Record, Forgiveness, and the Future of Criminal Justice

Mark Fenwick·Paulius Jurcys·Sebastian Porsdam Mann
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Digital technologies can preserve records of wrongdoing indefinitely, and AI can give those records continuing influence over a person's future. We describe this condition as the eternal data present and argue that it threatens the possibility of forgiveness. In criminal justice, formal punishment has an end, whereas the harms caused by the continued use of criminal records may not. Drawing on Hegel's account of the "hard heart" and Arendt's account of the irreversibility of action, we distinguish two dangers that digital systems can combine. People may be permanently identified with what they have done, and acts that cannot be undone may continue to determine what happens to them. We propose a right to remain unfinished, supported by rights to limits on the weight given to older records, to re-evaluation in light of personal change, to reassessment of inferences that affect their lives, and to time limits on the use of records in specified decisions. These proposals extend the ethics of AI beyond accuracy, transparency, and non-discrimination to address how long past wrongdoing should be allowed to govern a person's life.

Explore related subjects

cs.CYcs.AI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mark Fenwick, Paulius Jurcys, Sebastian Porsdam Mann. 2026-10-11. The Imperishable Record, Forgiveness, and the Future of Criminal Justice. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.15499

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Stability Regimes for Framing-Sensitive Fine-Tuning in Language Models

AI systems increasingly shape how individuals access and evaluate information, intensifying concerns about misinformation. Computational simulation offers a controlled complement to direct empirical study, with fine-tuned LLMs enabling powerful agent-based simulations. However, fine-tuning often induces broad behavioral shifts including bias drift, degenerate heuristics, and changes in baseline task behavior, which undermine experimental validity. The central challenge is inducing localized decision shifts while preserving the model's aggregate behavior outside the targeted intervention. We study this through a stability analysis of supervised fine-tuning, attenuating loss on selected training slices to shift false-claim acceptance. We introduce FrameRef, a large-scale dataset of semantically equivalent claims with controlled surface framings across five dimensions (Authoritative, Consensus, Emotional, Sensationalist, Prestige), with human validation confirming systematic framing effects on claim acceptance. We present a methodology for identifying model-specific stability regimes in which targeted error shifts can be induced while preserving aggregate accuracy and calibration, and demonstrate its application to selected language models. A sequential exposure task over FrameRef shows that small framing-conditioned shifts compound into substantially different cumulative outcomes under feedback, but largely disappear when feedback is removed, confirming that interventions modify specific decision tendencies rather than global performance. We release code, LoRA adapters, and data at https://github.com/infosenselab/framing-sensitive-ft.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

Technology-Supported Moderation in Online Deliberation

Mini-publics are an increasingly popular family of democratic innovation to broaden citizen engagement. However, convening a representative sample in person is resource-intensive, and requires significant organizational efforts to coordinate travel, venue logistics, and facilitator training. This chapter outlines the design and development of the Stanford Online Deliberation Platform, initially tailored for Deliberative Polling, building upon insights from in-person moderation in that setting, but supporting a broader range of methods and approaches in the deliberative space. The platform supports structured conversations for small groups (ideally 8-15 people) with automated moderation functionality, enabling the groups to assume ownership of the deliberative conversation rather than relying on a moderator persona. We describe the platform's architecture and key design decisions, including the deliberation flow, room assignment, speaker management, speaking nudges, agenda management, outcome development, and real-time monitoring. Between its inception in 2018 and 2025, the platform has facilitated over 30,000 unique participants engaging in deliberations; we catalog 54 deliberations with at least 100 participants up to December 2025, spanning a diverse range of languages, countries, and topics. Finally, we establish a standardized vocabulary for future analyses by defining the terminology employed in the platform's data and documenting significant software revisions over time.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

Institutionalizing Trust in Data Exchange: Trust-Anchor Model of the Data Credit Guarantee Organization and Its Simulation-Based Comparison

Data trading markets that span industries and regions are expanding, but the implicit trust that supports data use within an organization does not carry over to cross-domain exchange. This paper examines the Data Credit Guarantee Organization (DCGO), a proposal to institutionalize trust through third-party verification and certification, and asks what it means to trust data, what such certification can support, and under what conditions DCGO outperforms existing trading models. We decompose trust in data into four layers: authenticity of entity, authenticity and integrity of data, rights and conditions of use, and history and auditability. A third party can certify authenticity but not the correctness of content, and DCGO is positioned as a trust anchor spanning existing marketplaces and data spaces. We then extend the Law Merchant model with three data-specific properties, namely imperfect ex-post detection, cheap pseudonyms, and non-rivalry of harm, and compare bilateral trading with DCGO by agent-based simulation. DCGO keeps the buyer's payoff near its theoretical upper bound regardless of the market environment, whereas bilateral trading loses even when fraud is always detected. Identity verification proves to be a prerequisite for record sharing, and pre-verification is the only function that limits the spread of harm. On the seller side, honest sellers join voluntarily whenever the price premium exceeds the fee. Lock-in and a critical mass for diffusion, however, call for fee governance and support for entry.

cs.CY↗