Pseudo-Panel Event Studies: Econometric Foundations for Credible Applications

Dongwoo Kim

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.16754

Pseudo-Panel Event Studies: Econometric Foundations for Credible Applications

Dongwoo Kim

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Event studies with panel data are widely used to estimate treatment effects. With repeated cross-sections, future treatment dates are unobserved for untreated individuals. Pseudo-panel event studies impute pre-treatment outcomes of the treated using matched untreated individuals. This paper establishes identification in such designs and characterizes bias when identification conditions fail. I show that the pseudo-panel regression is equivalent to weighted least squares with group means. This representation simplifies computation and yields analytical inference. In simulations, analytical confidence intervals attain near-nominal coverage, whereas conventional intervals substantially undercover. I also develop a doubly robust estimator using richer covariates, a symmetric matching design with synthetic type fixed effects, and a fully nonparametric estimator that accommodates heterogeneous treatment effects. In a Korean panel survey, the pseudo-panel regression yields an employment child penalty of 42.1%, close to 46.9% in the actual panel. Applications to repeated cross-sections yield employment penalties of about one-third.

Explore related subjects

econ.EM

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Dongwoo Kim. 2026-10-12. Pseudo-Panel Event Studies: Econometric Foundations for Credible Applications. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.16754

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Identification and Inference in proxy-SVARs with non-Gaussian shocks

Two frequent approaches for identifying structural VARs are external instruments, which carry economic content but are often weak, and non-Gaussianity of the shocks, which provides statistical identification but carries no economic meaning. We combine the two strategies in a single generalized method of moments framework. This hybrid approach point-identifies the target shocks while also identifying the non-target shocks up to sign and ordering. Under suitable rank conditions, the higher-order moments of the structural shocks anchor the identification uniformly over the instrument strength. Consequently, under local-to-zero proxy relevance, estimators of the dynamic causal effects remain consistent, and standard asymptotic inference remains valid. Moreover, the Anderson-Rubin confidence sets are substantially narrower than their instrument-only counterparts. The hybrid estimator is also more efficient than either source of identification used in isolation: at any fixed proxy relevance, even a weak instrument increases the efficiency of the estimator through its covariance with the non-Gaussian moment block. Under local deviations from proxy exogeneity, we provide asymptotic bias bounds and show that stronger non-Gaussianity of the shocks compresses the bias. Finally, the over-identified structure yields two mutually orthogonal specification tests for proxy exogeneity and the validity of the higher-order moment conditions. We derive their limiting distributions and provide a bootstrap procedure for finite-sample critical values. Monte Carlo simulations and two applications with identification of oil news-shock and a Euro-area MP shock demonstrate the potential of our framework.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2026

Testing for an Explosive Bubble using High-Frequency Volatility

Based on a continuous-time stochastic volatility model with a linear drift, we develop a test for explosive behavior in financial asset prices at a low frequency when prices are sampled at a higher frequency. The test exploits the volatility information in the high-frequency data. The method consists of devolatizing log-asset price increments with realized volatility measures and performing a supremum-type recursive Dickey-Fuller test on the devolatized sample. The proposed test has a nuisance-parameter-free asymptotic distribution and is easy to implement. We study the size and power properties of the test in Monte Carlo simulations. A real-time date-stamping strategy based on the devolatized sample is proposed for the origination and conclusion dates of the explosive regime. Conditions under which the real-time date-stamping strategy is consistent are established. The test and the date-stamping strategy are applied to study explosive behavior in cryptocurrency and stock markets.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2026

Difference-in-Differences Estimators When No Unit Remains Untreated

We study difference-in-differences designs in which all units are initially untreated and later receive heterogeneous, strictly positive treatment doses. When quasi-untreated units receive doses close to zero, a difference-in-difference estimand using those units as the control group identifies a weighted average treatment effect per unit of treatment, under a parallel-trends assumption. We develop a nonparametric estimator and bias-corrected confidence intervals for this parameter. We also show that the assumptions justifying the usual two-way fixed-effects estimator imply testable linearity restrictions, and propose specification tests that can guide its use.

econ.EM↗