Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.21352

Product Costing in Data Pipelines

Abstract

Large data-intensive enterprises spend millions of dollars monthly running data pipelines. Apportioning this cost back to individual products, known as product costing, is a prerequisite for data pricing and cost recovery. However, this process is fundamentally more challenging than physical manufacturing costing due to the unique characteristics of data pipelines, including the non-rivalrous nature of data that complicates the costing formulation, the prevalence of cyclic dependencies that distort the accuracy of results, and the massive scale of pipelines that leads to computational intractability. In this paper, for the first time, we formalize the problem of product costing in data pipelines as a manufacturing cost of data products (MCDP) problem to overcome the non-rivalrous nature of data. To solve MCDP, we propose CostApp, a hybrid algorithm that achieves both exactness and scalability, even for cyclic and massive-scale pipelines. CostApp performs a dimensionality reduction by isolating cyclic dependencies via a feedback arc set (FAS). It aggregates costs onto a compact set of key vertices using a scalable iterative approach, transforming the intractable computational problem into a reduced linear system that can be solved exactly and efficiently by a basic matrix-based method. Experiments on both real-world data and synthetic data show that CostApp scales to process a production pipeline with over 28 million entities within an hour while preserving exactness, supporting pipelines up to 10^2 larger than the direct matrix-based baseline.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Li Peng, Jie You, Feng Shi, Yihang Wu, Jianxin Wang, Weiran Liu, Xinyu Peng, Junhua Wang, Lei Zhang, Lin Qu, Xiaohui Yu, Kui Ren, Jinfei Liu. 2026-10-15. Product Costing in Data Pipelines. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.21352

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

BioXArena: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Multi-Modal Biomedical Machine Learning Tasks

Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly automate machine-learning model building, yet biomedical benchmarks emphasize question answering, reasoning, and tool use or cover narrow slices of biomedical ML coding. We introduce BioXArena, a biomedical machine learning (BioML) coding benchmark for task-specific model building on heterogeneous, often multi-modal datasets. It contains 76 end-to-end tasks across 9 domains: sequence, single-cell, structure, network biology, chemical biology, perturbation dynamics, phenotype--disease, imaging, and text-integrated tasks. Each task packages primary-source data with hidden labels, held-out graders, and biology-aware metrics on a unified 0-to-100 scale; agents write runnable code, train models, and predict private test samples. BioXArena emphasizes realistic data interfaces: most tasks require agents to integrate multiple input sources, including 46 tasks that combine distinct modality families. We compare 18 harness--backbone configurations: general-purpose coding, biomedical, and ML agents plus our Minimal runner, all under the same controlled resource configuration. Codex with GPT-6 Astra achieves the highest task-level average score of 73.91 among 18 configurations, closely followed by Claude Code with Opus 5.5 (73.79). Matched-backbone comparisons show higher observed scores for mature coding systems than for Minimal; seven Minimal backends characterize model differences under a fixed runner. Beyond the main leaderboard, ablations, robustness checks, and scaling, runtime, and failure-mode analyses characterize how backbones, scaffolds, budgets, and domains affect BioML coding performance, exposing modeling and execution gaps across agent and LLM backbone families.

cs.CE↗

FlatClip: Reusing Image Foundation Models for fMRI Representation Learning via Cortical Flatmaps

Can the spatial organization of cortical activity help transfer frozen image representations to fMRI prediction? We introduce FlatClip, which renders cortical activity as anatomy-linked flatmaps and extracts features with a frozen SigLIP2 encoder. Only a lightweight downstream probe is trained, without fMRI-specific encoder pretraining or fine-tuning. Across four resting-state benchmarks, FlatClip outperforms the evaluated ROI-level baselines on HCP and ADNI, but is weaker on PPMI and below the strongest voxel-level models overall. On NSD visual-fMRI decoding, restricting inputs to visual or NSD-provided task-active cortex improves recognition over whole-cortex inputs. Spatial perturbations reduce performance with both retrained and fixed readouts, and anatomy-linked arrangements outperform cortical-pixel permutations across three colormaps. Together, these results demonstrate a practical route for reusing image-pretrained features in fMRI and highlight cortical arrangement and input-region selection as important design choices. Code is available at https://github.com/OneMore1/FlatClip.

cs.CE↗

CompFlowLab: A Python code to develop and prototype new data-driven models for challenging compressible flow problems with shocks and chemical reactions

CompFlowLab is an open-source Python environment that is capable of modeling different classes of compressible flow problems (including shocks, flames, and detonation waves) using a one-dimensional compressible Navier-Stokes solver with multi-species transport and chemical-reaction models. It is designed specifically for the data-driven modeling community as a lightweight, accessible prototyping platform to test, develop, and evaluate new modeling methods on numerically and physically challenging compressible flow problems, especially those featuring shocks and chemical reactions. Specifically, CompFlowLab aims at (1) providing computationally efficient calculations on advection-dominanted problems that are well-recognized to be difficult for conventional data-driven modeling techniques, such as shocks, flames, and detonation waves, and more importantly (2) enabling rapid testing and prototyping of new data-driven models. The code serves three primary purposes: (1) generating high-fidelity full order model data for training of data-driven modeling, (2) providing a modular platform for implementing and testing novel data-driven algorithms (e.g., machine learning methods and reduced-order modeling techniques) on challenging physics, and (3) offering a standalone Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) solver with validated test cases that can also support numerical method development in the broader CFD community. By unifying these capabilities in a clean, extensible Python codebase, CompFlowLab lowers barriers to innovation at the intersection of model reduction and complex fluid dynamics.

cs.CE↗