Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.21756

Locally Robust Inference with Outcomes Predicted by Machine Learning

Abstract

Many parameters of interest in economics depend on outcomes generated by machine learning (ML).These generated outcomes are subsequently used in standard econometric estimation and typically treated as observed, a practice that threatens the validity of downstream inference. Empirically relevant cases include dynamic treatment effects under sequential exogeneity, long-term effects with surrogates, the partially linear model with an ML-predicted outcome, productivity persistence with an unrestricted production function and constructed instruments, and outcomes residualized of confounding variation. This paper develops a three-step locally robust GMM framework for valid inference when the dependent variable is generated by ML. We construct a debiased moment condition that augments the identifying moment with first- and second-step influence functions, making inference on the parameter of interest locally insensitive to regularization and model selection biases at both steps. We establish consistency and asymptotic normality of the proposed estimator and illustrate its finite-sample performance through Monte Carlo simulations. We also apply the method to U.S. mortgage data to study conditional Black--White disparities in a race-blind ML default-risk score. The score predicts subsequent default well overall, but the conditional disparity embedded in the score is much smaller than the corresponding disparity in realized serious delinquency; accounting for first-step estimation also raises the naive out-of-sample estimate of the score disparity.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Juan Carlos Escanciano, Alejandro Puerta-Cuartas. 2026-10-15. Locally Robust Inference with Outcomes Predicted by Machine Learning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.21756

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The Anatomy of Dependence in Multivariate Ordered Choice

When individuals make simultaneous decisions across multiple ordered dimensions, standard multivariate ordered choice models impose narrow bracketing, with each dimension decided as if the others did not exist. We develop a general rectangular structure model capturing broad bracketing while nesting the standard model. The framework introduces two layers of dependence, one through the threshold structure associated with decision rules and the other through the correlation of latent utilities. We provide microfoundations, prove identification, and discuss estimation. We showcase the model in applications to parental investment in children's education, cryptocurrency familiarity and expectations, and health insurance, where the latter separates moral hazard from adverse selection.

econ.EM↗

Marital Sorting, Household Inequality and Selection

Using CPS data for 1976 to 2025, we explore how wage inequality has evolved for married couples with both spouses working full time full year, and its impact on household income inequality. We also investigate how marriage sorting patterns have changed over this period. To determine the factors driving income inequality we estimate a model explaining the joint distribution of couples' wages that accounts for spouses' employment decisions. This requires a multivariate distribution regression model that incorporates a double selection rule. We find that income inequality has increased for these households and increased wage sorting has exacerbated the inequality resulting from individual wage growth. We find that positive sorting partially reflects the correlation across unobservables influencing the wages of both members of the marriage. We decompose the changes in sorting patterns over the 50-year sample into structural, composition and selection effects and find that the increase in positive sorting primarily reflects the increased skill premia for both observed and unobserved characteristics.

econ.EM↗

Evaluating A/B Testing Methodologies via Sample Splitting: Theory and Practice

We develop a theoretical framework for sample splitting in A/B testing environments, where data for each test are partitioned into two splits to measure methodological performance when the true impacts of tests are unobserved. We show that sample-split estimators are generally biased for full-sample performance but consistently estimate sample-split analogues of it. We derive their asymptotic distributions, construct valid confidence intervals, and characterize the bias-variance trade-offs underlying sample-split design choices. We validate our theoretical results through simulations and provide implementation guidance for A/B testing products seeking to evaluate new estimators and decision rules.

econ.EM↗