Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.24230

Search and Matching without Reciprocity

Abstract

We study equilibrium sorting in the canonical search-and-matching model with Nash bargaining and ex-ante and ex-post heterogeneity. Under standard conditions for assortative matching under search, match surplus retains two properties of Becker's frictionless benchmark---single-crossing and single-peakedness---but necessarily loses the third, reciprocity. Instead, search generates consensus: intervals of types share the same surplus-maximizing partner. For such intervals, mismatched pairs are more likely to match, conditional on meeting, than perfectly assortative ones. Two forces drive this: with search, outside options rise less than one-for-one with productivity and fall more for agents with fewer suitable partners. Globally, upper contour sets of the match-probability surface are lattices below an endogenous threshold but almost never above it. This means that MLRP fails for some log-concave survival function.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nicolas Bonneton, Christopher Sandmann. 2026-10-16. Search and Matching without Reciprocity. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.24230

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Generalized Multidimensional Contests with Asymmetric Players: Equilibrium and Optimal Prize Design

We study $n$-dimensional Tullock contests between two players with heterogeneous effort costs. We establish sharp bounds on discriminatory power $r$ ensuring that equilibrium is unique and pure across prize rules and cost asymmetries: $r\leq1/\lceil n/2\rceil$ when prizes depend only on the number of victories across all dimensions, and $r\leq1/n$ when they may also depend on player identity. An effort-maximizing rule splits the prize unless one player wins by a sufficient margin in the first case, and gives the weaker player a possibly zero headstart in the second. When both bounds hold, restricting prizes to victory counts alone can be costless despite unequal costs, but the percentage loss in total effort weakly increases with asymmetry.

econ.TH↗

Should the Timing of Inspections be Predictable?

A principal hires an agent to work on a long-term project that culminates in a breakthrough or a breakdown. At each time, the agent privately chooses to work or shirk. Working increases the arrival rate of breakthroughs and decreases the arrival rate of breakdowns. To motivate the agent to work, the principal conducts costly inspections. She fires the agent if shirking is detected. We characterize the principal's optimal inspection policy. Predictable inspections are optimal if work primarily generates breakthroughs. Random inspections are typically optimal if work primarily prevents breakdowns. Crucially, the agent's actions affect the curvature of the project's survival probability, which determines his induced risk attitude over the timing of planned inspections.

econ.TH↗

Mechanism Design by a Politician

A set of agents has to make a decision about the provision of a public good and its financing. Agents have heterogeneous values for the public good and each agent's value is private information. An agenda-setter has the right to make a proposal about a public-good level and a vector of contributions. For the proposal to be approved, only the favourable votes of a majority of agents are needed. If the proposal is not approved, a type-dependent outside option is implemented. I characterize the optimal public-good provision and the coalition-formation for any outside option in dominant strategies. Optimal public-good provision might be a non-monotonic function of the outside option public-good level. Moreover, the optimal coalition might be a non-convex set of types. Importantly, majority voting creates endogenously countervailing incentives among agents.

econ.TH↗