Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.25966

Behavioral Probes for Information Flow in LLM Swarms

Abstract

Most existing approaches to LLM swarm optimization are utility-driven, focusing on final task utility while leaving the processing, integration, and reliance of information within individual interactions largely implicit. To address this, we study LLM swarm interactions from an information-flow-based view and introduce behavioral probes to quantify information flow patterns. Specifically, we repurpose External Context Score (ECS) and Parametric Knowledge Score (PKS)---originally designed for hallucination analysis---to measure a node's external-context dependence and parametric-knowledge dependence, respectively. Across controlled and realistic swarm settings, we observe consistent patterns: ECS increases with input relevance and distinguishes useful multi-source contributions, while PKS decreases as informative context accumulates. Building on this heuristic interpretation, we demonstrate how these probes can complement utility-driven structure optimization in two controlled applications. Probe-guided node pruning reduces redundant communication and token consumption, and probe-guided reasoning-path search accelerates convergence compared to utility-only baselines. Our empirical results suggest that behavioral probes can make the internal information flow of LLM swarms observable and serve as effective auxiliary signals for structure optimization.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Junhui Chen, Yu Zhang, Lantian Li, Dong Wang. 2026-10-19. Behavioral Probes for Information Flow in LLM Swarms. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.25966

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

OpenAgenet / OAN White Paper: Open Infrastructure for Trusted Agent Interconnection

OpenAgenet, abbreviated as OAN, is an open infrastructure project for trusted Agent interconnection. It addresses a problem that becomes visible when Agents move from isolated applications into open, multi-operator networks: before an Agent can safely discover, select, and invoke another Agent, it needs a way to verify identity provenance, governance state, discovery authorization, freshness, and pre-connection trust evidence. OAN is designed as a protocol-neutral trust layer. It does not replace Agent interaction protocols, tool protocols, model orchestration frameworks, or application-level workflows. Instead, it provides routing-aware did:oan-based resource identity, local OAN Identity material for signing and authentication, governance-backed admission, Registrar-assisted onboarding, Root-verified package publication, authorization-aware Discovery, Root-issued infrastructure authorization VCs, controller-aware authorization, and profile-defined signed trusted invocation. The architectural center of OAN is the combination of federated governance, resource identity, trusted Discovery, and the Root Node's three hub responsibilities. Root acts as a trust authorization hub for accepted identity state and evidence, a data-distribution hub for Root-verified packages, and a semantic-governance hub for the tag tree shared by registration and Discovery. This white paper explains the motivation, architecture, roles, governance model, relationship with MCP, A2A, and ANP, deployment patterns, cooperation model, on-chain governance layer, prototype status, public pilot network, standardization surfaces, performance profile, and roadmap of OAN.

cs.MA↗

OpenAgenet / OAN Yellow Paper: Technical Architecture for Trust-Governed Resource Identity and Discovery

This yellow paper describes the technical architecture of OpenAgenet / OAN. OAN is a protocol-neutral trust layer for open Agent interconnection and discoverable AI resource products. It specifies the role architecture, did:oan identity objects, registration workflow, governance-backed Root lifecycle enforcement, Root-verified package model, authorization-aware Discovery, Root-issued infrastructure authorization VCs, signed trusted invocation, Root's trust, data-distribution, and semantic-governance hub responsibilities, verification requirements, state transitions, security properties, implementation boundaries, and deployment considerations. The design is intended to support heterogeneous Agent frameworks and interaction protocols, including MCP, A2A, ANP-like systems, domain-specific Agent protocols, Skills, MCP Servers, and Tool/API resources. OAN does not define the entire business conversation among Agents or the native protocol of every resource; it defines how resource identities become admissible, discoverable, verifiable, and safe to approach before protocol-specific interaction begins, and how defined profiles carry that identity into protected protocol interaction.

cs.MA↗

ECHO: Learning Epistemically Adaptive Language Agents with Turn-Level Credit

Effective multi-turn agents must decide what information to seek, how to use new evidence, and when they are certain enough to act. We introduce Epistemic Decision Processes (EDPs), a belief-state formulation of multi-turn information seeking in which actions produce external observations that update the agent's posterior over a latent task variable. EDPs make epistemic adaptivity explicit: good policies choose actions that are useful under the current belief, not merely those that correlate with eventual success. We then introduce ECHO (Epistemic Credit for History-Conditioned Optimization), a practical clipped policy-gradient objective that assigns turn-level credit using posterior-sensitive rewards. In the Clue Selector Game, a novel controlled evidence-seeking benchmark, and in CRAFT, a challenging multiagent coordination game, we show that ECHO substantially improves resolution, information gain, and efficiency over trajectory-level GRPO, and matches or exceeds frontier baselines on epistemic metrics such as grounding, recovery, and calibration.

cs.MA↗