Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.26156

Dynamical Batching: How Class-Cycling Training Shapes the Internal Structure of Neural Networks

Abstract

We investigate whether cyclically varying the class composition of training batches can modify both the performance and the internal organization of neural networks. Motivated by nonequilibrium systems, in which cycling between related sub-goals can make switching between their solutions increasingly efficient, we introduce Dynamical Batching (DB), a sampling protocol that periodically emphasizes each class while leaving the loss and the optimizer unchanged, and compare it with Uniform Batching (UB), in which every mini-batch has equal class proportions. In the regime where standard training fails, DB changes the outcome: on a three-arm spiral, a capacity-limited MLP that plateaus far below perfect accuracy under UB fits the training data under DB. Tracking individual weights, we find that under DB the change between class-specialized states is carried by a smaller set of weights than under UB, and that this set is markedly more persistent from cycle to cycle, on every synthetic dataset we test and in a wider network that fits the data under both protocols. This organization is a signature of the protocol rather than a predictor of its benefit: it appears equally where DB leaves accuracy unchanged. On CIFAR-10, the same protocol modestly improves the test accuracy of a channel-narrowed ResNet-10, a standard residual architecture, and of a second capacity-limited convolutional network. These results show that how class emphasis is distributed in time can shape both the solution a network reaches and the internal structure of the network.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nicolás Ratier-Werbin, Samuel Lozano, Miguel Ruiz-García. 2026-10-19. Dynamical Batching: How Class-Cycling Training Shapes the Internal Structure of Neural Networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.26156

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Heterogeneous Sheaf Neural Networks

Heterogeneous graphs, whose nodes and edges can belong to different types and feature spaces, arise in many real-world domains, including biology, recommendation, social networks, and computer systems. Existing heterogeneous graph neural networks typically handle this heterogeneity at the architectural level through relation-specific modules, meta-path machinery or type-aware attention, which often leads to increasingly specialised parameter-heavy designs. In this work, we propose HetSheaf, a framework for learning heterogeneous graphs through cellular sheaves. Instead of encoding heterogeneity solely in the architecture, HetSheaf represents it directly in the underlying data structure by assigning type-aware local feature spaces and learning restriction maps conditioned on node features, node types, and edge types. To support graph-level prediction, we further introduce SheafPool, a universal stalk-space readout that aggregates node representations while being invariant to local changes of basis, thereby making graph classification with sheaf networks well-defined and achieving an F1 Score up to 42 percentage points higher than mean pooling. Across a diverse suite of benchmarks (node classification, link prediction and graph classification). HetSheaf consistently achieves up to 2 percentage points higher performance (up to 94.97% Macro F1 Score on node classification and up to 99.62% on link prediction) on the Heterogeneous Graph Benchmark (HGB) framework against homogeneous (GCN, GAT, GIN, GraphSAGE), heterogeneous (R-GCN, HAT, HGT) and type-agnostic sheaf baselines, while reducing the number of parameters by up to 10$\times$.

cs.LG↗

Risk-averse learning with delayed feedback

In real-world scenarios, risk-averse learning is valuable for mitigating potential adverse outcomes. However, the delayed feedback makes it challenging to assess and manage risk effectively. In this paper, we investigate risk-averse learning using Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) as risk measure, while incorporating feedback with random but bounded delays. We develop two risk-averse learning algorithms that rely on one-point and two-point zeroth-order optimization approaches, respectively. The dynamic regrets of the algorithms are analyzed in terms of the cumulative delay and the number of total samplings. In the absence of delay, the regret bounds match the established bounds of zeroth-order stochastic gradient methods for risk-averse learning. Furthermore, the two-point risk-averse learning outperforms the one-point algorithm by achieving a smaller regret bound. We provide numerical experiments on a dynamic pricing problem to demonstrate the performance of the algorithms.

cs.LG↗

On the Value of Cross-Modal Misalignment in Multimodal Representation Learning

Multimodal representation learning, exemplified by multimodal contrastive learning (MMCL) using image-text pairs, aims to learn powerful representations by aligning cues across modalities. This approach relies on the core assumption that the exemplar image-text pairs constitute two representations of an identical concept. However, recent research has revealed that real-world datasets often exhibit \emph{cross-modal misalignment}. There are two distinct viewpoints on how to address this issue: one suggests mitigating the misalignment, and the other leveraging it. We seek here to reconcile these seemingly opposing perspectives and to provide a practical guide for practitioners. Using latent variable models, we thus formalize cross-modal misalignment by introducing two specific mechanisms: \emph{selection bias}, where some semantic variables are absent in the text, and \emph{perturbation bias}, where semantic variables are altered---both leading to misalignment in data pairs. Our theoretical analysis shows that, under suitable assumptions, population global minimizers of an alignment--entropy surrogate yield representations that depend only on the semantic variables unaffected by selection and perturbation biases and locally identify this subset almost surely. Extensive empirical studies on synthetic data and real image-text datasets further examine how cross-modal misalignment shapes semantic predictability and downstream performance, shedding light on its nuanced impact on multimodal representation learning.

cs.LG↗