Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.26428

Systemic collapse emergence from climate-induced perturbations in transportation networks

Mauro Faccin·Tomas Scagliarini·Manlio De Domenico
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The interaction between human infrastructures and external events results in loss of functionality or even complete system disruption through a snowball effect of cascading-failures. Their complex interplay challenges their prevention, affecting the human population that rely on their functionality. Understanding how these networks respond to external perturbations is crucial for predicting and mitigating the impacts of disruptive events. In particular, meteorological events, while not preventable, can have significant impacts on human infrastructure. Here, we propose a model coupling the dynamics of transportation systems to the dynamics of external events considered as fields, to capture at the same time the critical behavior of the former and the level of influence of the latter. The impact of rainfalls on real-world railway networks provides a compelling case study, showcasing local endemic and system-wide disruptions around a critical value of the rainfall strength. Remarkably, localized perturbations on the wider network reveals the local weaknesses of the global infrastructure, and we assess them in terms of system perturbability and corresponding societal risk. Our framework opens the door to the quantitative analysis of criticalities in essential human infrastructure imputable to vulnerabilities that are set to intensify due to climate change.

Explore related subjects

physics.soc-phcond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.stat-mechphysics.app-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mauro Faccin, Tomas Scagliarini, Manlio De Domenico. 2026-10-19. Systemic collapse emergence from climate-induced perturbations in transportation networks. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2532180123

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

The Impact of Mahjong on Marital Relationships

One of the national treasures, Mahjong, is a strategic card game originating from China, played competitively by constructing and optimizing card hands among four players. In the game, players aim to achieve specific combinations of cards, known as "winning hands," through actions such as drawing, discarding, pung, and kong. Mahjong not only tests memory and strategy but also integrates probability and chance, embodying profound cultural significance and social attributes. However, as Mahjong becomes a widely popular social activity, its impact on personal life has gradually become apparent. In this paper, I delve into the analysis of the effects of playing Mahjong on marital relationships, particularly the three negative effects it brings to women: Time Displacement: The uncertainty of Mahjong playing time leads to a reduction in shared time between spouses. Women may feel neglected due to the lack of companionship, leading to "Mahjong Panic Syndrome." Emotional Conflict: Mahjong playing can result in losses, and men may harbor "resentment from defeat" at the Mahjong table, which could be brought into the household and spark marital disputes. Social Isolation: Women may feel excluded from their partner's social circle if they do not participate in Mahjong activities, experiencing "marginalization at the card table." This study not only reveals the potential negative impact of late-night Mahjong returns on marital relationships but also provides new insights into communication and empathy between spouses from the perspectives of decision trees, time series analysis, and game theory. It also finds the optimal solution through Monte Carlo simulations.

physics.soc-ph↗
arXiv2026

Percolation Transition of K-Destinations Reveals Universal Backbone of Urban Mobility Networks

Cities are held together by a small subset of recurrent origin--destination ties, but extracting this backbone from noisy mobility data remains difficult, and most models still prioritize distance over connectivity. We build directed mobility networks from 48 months of mobile-phone data across eight U.S. cities (2018--2021) and apply a rank-based percolation filter that retains, for each origin, its top-K destinations. Defining K* as the smallest cutoff that yields a strongly connected network, we find that city-specific thresholds cluster tightly across space and time, with a representative value near $K\approx130$. Degree-preserving and gravity-style baselines do not recover this scale, underscoring the importance of selectively preserved long-range functional ties. We then define PPD(K), an origin-level mobility concentration measure, and show that socioeconomic associations peak around the percolation-derived integration regime. Together, these findings offer a principled method to extract a minimal mobility backbone and connect its structure to persistent socioeconomic variation.

physics.soc-ph↗
arXiv2026

Mobility and Contact Networks Shape Epidemic Outcomes: A Large-Scale Agent-Based Modeling Study

Human mobility plays a central role in shaping contact patterns that drive infectious disease transmission, yet mobility is often simplified in agent-based models (ABMs) due to data and computational constraints. The effects of these simplifications on model outputs are poorly understood. In this study, we systematically examined how alternative mobility assumptions influence emergent contact networks and epidemic dynamics within a large-scale ABM. Using a synthetic population of one million agents representing an urban environment, we implemented five mobility models varying along two dimensions: activity patterns (empirically derived vs. randomized) and destination choice mechanisms (empirical popularity, distance-based, or random). Holding disease parameters constant, we found that mobility assumptions alone produced substantially different contact network structures and epidemic trajectories, including differences in peak incidence and shifts in outbreak timing. Importantly, these differences could not be attributed to agents simply moving more or less overall since aggregate movement volumes were broadly comparable across models. Instead, the contrasting dynamics arose from how mobility generates contact opportunities: specifically, who meets whom, where, and how often. These results suggest that in models where mobility has not been carefully calibrated, simulated epidemic outcomes and evaluations of interventions may reflect mobility assumptions as much as underlying disease parameters. Our findings underscore the importance of mobility model calibration and validation, particularly in policy-facing applications.

physics.soc-ph↗