Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.27580

Factual Access States in Diffusion Language Models: From Mechanism to Knowledge Editing and Retrieval

Yuchen Guo·Zhuoyuan Mao·Yiwen Guo
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Factual recall is a lookup: some representation inside the network serves as the key, and what that key is made of decides which queries can retrieve the fact, what an edit must cover, and what a retriever can read. We call it the factual access state. In autoregressive (AR) models the subject position enriches attributes largely independently of the relation, and relation-specific selection happens later, at the readout position. In masked diffusion language models (DLMs) we find the state is assembled differently, and much earlier: in the first attention layer the wording of the relation is routed into the position of whichever entity is visible and the early feed-forward layers look the fact up on this fused representation. The state therefore varies with the relation's surface form and with the query direction, so the queries about one fact occupy a region of state space rather than a point, and an operation on the fact succeeds only for queries that enter it. We treat the state as an interface to a DLM's factual knowledge, and put it to two uses. Writing to the state gives a knowledge editor: from one declarative statement, Multi-View Edit fits one shared value per direction across that region and installs it in the early-MLP block, preserving source-prompt reliability while substantially improving paraphrase and reverse question answering, where AR editors gain near zero. Reading it suggests a complementary use: the state at each entity position can serve as a relation-specific retrieval vector with no training, returning both pieces of evidence for two-entity queries on which pooled, prompted and lexical retrievers almost never return both.

Explore related subjects

cs.CLcs.AIcs.IRcs.LG

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yuchen Guo, Zhuoyuan Mao, Yiwen Guo. 2026-10-20. Factual Access States in Diffusion Language Models: From Mechanism to Knowledge Editing and Retrieval. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27580

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

AnnoCaseLaw: Legal Annotation Benchmark of Civil Negligence

Language models offer a way to scale costly, labour-intensive expert annotation, but their ability to reproduce expert judgements remains uncertain. This is particularly challenging in law, where annotators must distinguish the reasoning supporting judicial decisions from other legally relevant discussion. We present AnnoCaseLaw as a densely annotated benchmark comprising $471$ U.S. civil-negligence court opinions with more than $12,000$ expert highlights across five annotation categories. We evaluate proprietary frontier, open-weight, legal-specialised, and decision models on their ability to reproduce these annotations. Models perform better on Facts and Outcome than on Application of Law to Facts, Procedural History, and Relevant Precedents. On Application of Law to Facts, proprietary frontier models achieve the strongest balance of reasoning coverage and precision, while the open-weight model Gemma 4 achieves comparable Macro-F1 to proprietary frontier models at a fraction of the estimated inference cost. Our findings highlight the importance of evaluating annotation coverage and cost alongside aggregate scores when assessing the feasibility of automated legal annotation.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Neither Stochastic Parroting nor AGI: LLMs Solve Tasks through Context-Directed Extrapolation from Training Data Priors

This position paper argues that many behaviours framed as either "stochastic parroting" or "advanced reasoning" are better explained as context-directed extrapolation from training-data priors, and that ML and NLP research communities would benefit from evaluations that distinguish remembering and basic extrapolation from genuine application-level generalisation. Our central contribution is an actionable evaluation checklist and design patterns that make these distinctions testable in practice. Our framework posits that LLMs extrapolate from training data priors while using context to guide the model to the appropriate priors; we call this "context-directed extrapolation." Specifically, this context direction is achieved through examples in base models, leading to in-context learning, while instruction tuning allows analogous task specification via prompts rather than explicit examples. We argue that adopting this more realistic framework and controls for improving evaluation would better calibrate claims about LLM "reasoning," refocus research on how LLM performance interacts with training data and generalisability to out-of-domain tasks, and reduce miscalibration in deployment and policy decisions.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Effects of Theory of Mind and Prosocial Beliefs on Steering Human-Aligned Behaviors of LLMs in Ultimatum Games

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown potential in simulating human behaviors and performing theory-of-mind (ToM) reasoning, crucial for complex social interactions. We investigate ToM reasoning's role in aligning agentic behaviors with human norms in negotiation tasks, using the ultimatum game as our referenced task. We initialized LLM agents with different prosocial beliefs (Greedy, Fair, Selfless) and reasoning methods (chain of thought and ToM reasoning of varying levels), examining their decision-making processes and outcomes across multiple LLMs, including reasoning models like o3-mini and DeepSeek-R1 Distilled Qwen 32B. We perform 2,700 simulations to show that ToM reasoning enhances behavioral alignment with human norms, decision-making consistency, and negotiation outcomes. Consistent with prior findings, reasoning LLMs exhibit limited capability compared to ToM-enhanced LLMs, with different game roles benefiting from different ToM orders. Agents almost always chose strategies consistent with their assigned beliefs, and doing so aligned better with human norms in nearly every role, yet Greedy and Selfless agents still fell short of their norms in outcomes. Human verification further revealed that Llama 3.3 70B produces reasoning most consistent with its actions and beliefs. Our findings advance understanding of ToM's role in human-AI interaction and cooperative decision-making. The code used for our experiments can be found at https://github.com/Stealth-py/UltimatumToM.

cs.CL↗