S$^2$-MAS: A Society-Scale Multi-Agent Simulation Framework with 500 Million Household Persona Agents

Yang Li; Di Wan; Yike Wang; Chujun He; Zongsi Xu; Xiyu Chen; Sheng Zhong; Deng Binjie; Zhenwei Guo; Hou Jun; Kunhan Guo; Weihao Lin; Tuo Zhou; Hai Liu; Ye Luo

arXiv · 2610.27746

S$^2$-MAS: A Society-Scale Multi-Agent Simulation Framework with 500 Million Household Persona Agents

Yang Li·Di Wan·Yike Wang·Chujun He·Zongsi Xu·Xiyu Chen·Sheng Zhong·Deng Binjie·Zhenwei Guo·Hou Jun·Kunhan Guo·Weihao Lin·Tuo Zhou·Hai Liu·Ye Luo

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Simulating economic responses at society scale requires agents whose decisions reflect household circumstances and the effects of earlier actions. We introduce S$^2$-MAS, a society-scale multi-agent simulation framework built on 500 million synthetic household personas grounded in real-survey data. Its Genese engine separates decisions from state updates, while reusable financial scenarios and application ledgers track consumption, cash, debt and payments. Sharp-421m-mlx, a compact decision model trained with SFT + RLCD on 2.93 million examples, achieves 74.55% accuracy and 38.37% question-macro F1 in consumer financial-choice scenarios, outperforming Jev 1.13 and GLM-5.3-Flash on both measures. We evaluate eight financial task families and simulate 12 million distinct household agents in paired purchase-funding conditions. Jointly raising purchase goals and approved credit limits increases consumption, with responses differing across age and income groups. Education, employment and household-size differences persist after age--income standardization and mainly reflect transitions from deferral to purchase. Asset and debt groups differ in cash drawdown, repayment and closing debt. A 24-month panel varies purchase goals under a common credit product, with repayment and arrears updating subsequent offers. S$^2$-MAS links heterogeneous household decisions to evolving consumption, cash and repayment paths, supporting economic experiments across household groups, population scales and time horizons.

Explore related subjects

cs.MA cs.AI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Yang Li, Di Wan, Yike Wang, Chujun He, Zongsi Xu, Xiyu Chen, Sheng Zhong, Deng Binjie, Zhenwei Guo, Hou Jun, Kunhan Guo, Weihao Lin, Tuo Zhou, Hai Liu, Ye Luo. 2026-10-21. S$^2$-MAS: A Society-Scale Multi-Agent Simulation Framework with 500 Million Household Persona Agents. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27746

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Learning Large-Scale Competitive Team Behaviors with Mean-Field Interactions

While multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) has been proven effective across both collaborative and competitive tasks, existing algorithms often struggle to scale to large populations of agents. Recent advancements in mean-field (MF) theory provide scalable solutions by approximating population interactions as a continuum, yet most existing frameworks focus exclusively on either fully cooperative or purely competitive settings. To bridge this gap, we introduce MF-MAPPO, a mean-field extension of PPO designed for zero-sum team games that integrate intra-team cooperation with inter-team competition. MF-MAPPO employs a shared actor and a minimally informed critic per team and is trained directly on finite-population simulators, thereby enabling deployment to realistic scenarios with thousands of agents. We further show that MF-MAPPO naturally extends to partially observable settings through a simple gradient-regularized training scheme. Our evaluation utilizes large-scale benchmark scenarios using our own testing simulation platform for MF team games (MFEnv), including offense-defense battlefield tasks as well as variants of population-based rock-paper-scissors games that admit analytical solutions, for benchmarking. Across these benchmarks, MF-MAPPO outperforms existing methods and exhibits complex, heterogeneous behaviors, demonstrating the effectiveness of combining mean-field theory and MARL techniques at scale.

cs.MA↗

arXiv2026

Does Centralized Learning Help Embodied Agents Coordinate, and When Can a Tabular Study Tell?

Tabular studies are a common way to compare independent and centralized multi-agent learners, because they avoid function approximation. A natural expectation is that centralized learning, which learns joint actions, helps agents coordinate, especially when their bodies make solo success hard. Earlier work tests this only in parts: it measures coordination for one learning method, compares methods with the agents' bodies fixed, or varies speed but reports only how well the team did. We test it in a predator-prey environment, where teammates cooperatively hunt together while two teams compete. We compare independent Q-learning (IQL) with central Q-learning (CQL) in all four predator and prey pairings, under limits on speed and stamina, on a 5x5 and an 8x8 grid trained for 200,000 episodes each, and check that the agents learn on both. We measure coordination directly, with predictions for the main measurement fixed in advance. In this task, where one predator can capture prey alone, we find three things. First, CQL costs its agents in both roles on both grids, and its predators coordinate no more than IQL's. Second, its one benefit comes from acting on the best joint action: this cut capture time by 42% on the small grid with faster prey and unlimited stamina, but helped nowhere on the larger grid, where the best joint action had mostly never been tried. Third, on the larger grid a tie-breaking default decided which method won, even though the agents had passed a learning check. A tabular comparison can therefore be trusted only if it also checks how much of the state space the agents covered and implements the methods alike. We propose simple checks for both.

cs.MA↗

arXiv2026

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate

Multi-Agent Debate (MAD) improves the reasoning performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) through multi-round interaction. However, LLMs in MAD are highly susceptible to blind conformity. Existing individual evaluation methods, typically based on confidence or perplexity, fail to reflect the correctness of reasoning and may even exacerbate blind conformity. To address this, we shift the perspective from individual evaluation to group interaction. We define mutual referencing among LLMs as \textbf{Debate Relationships} and recognize that regulating these relationships is the key to mitigating blind conformity. In this paper, we propose a novel framework for \textbf{D}ynamically r\textbf{E}gulating deb\textbf{A}te \textbf{R}elationships (DEAR) from the group perspective. At first, DEAR quantifies consensus and divergence as \textit{group evidence} to capture the debate state. Then, DEAR operates through three stages: 1) What: perceiving group consultation tendency and uncertainty; 2) Who: introducing a Selection RL-Agent to dynamically select reference peers; and 3) How: adopting a Behavior RL-Agent to adaptively adjust generation behaviors. Notably, we formulate the execution of the two RL-Agents as a sequential decision-making process, jointly optimizing via multi-agent reinforcement learning. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DEAR achieves superior performance while significantly reducing token consumption.

cs.MA↗