Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.28071

Arithmetic Models for Commodity Futures, Vanilla, and Calendar Spread Options

Abstract

We develop an arithmetic multi-factor stochastic volatility model for commodity futures and options. The arithmetic specification yields a low-dimensional Markovian representation of the futures curve and semi-closed-form pricing formulas for vanilla and basket options, including calendar spread options. These properties make the model suitable for large-scale empirical estimation. We estimate the model using an unscented Kalman filter on a panel of WTI crude oil futures, vanilla options, and calendar spread options spanning 2013-2024. We find that three stochastic volatility factors are needed to capture both the level and slope of the volatility term structure, and that hedges based on these factors remove almost all of the daily risk of a portfolio of vanilla options. Calendar spread options provide information about the dependence structure of futures prices that is not captured by futures and vanilla options alone. A model estimated without calendar spread options systematically overprices them by overstating the decorrelation between adjacent futures contracts. Including these options in the estimation brings the model's decorrelation close to the observed decorrelation, which removes the overpricing and improves their hedges, at only a small loss of accuracy in the pricing and hedging of vanilla options. Finally, we show that the arithmetic model fits futures and vanilla options better than its geometric counterpart and hedges the vanilla options slightly better.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Malthe Rauh Johansen, Nina Lange, David Skovmand. 2026-10-20. Arithmetic Models for Commodity Futures, Vanilla, and Calendar Spread Options. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.28071

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

(Early) AI Compute Asset Pricing

Compute (computing power) is a scarce, capital-intensive input at the center of the AI economy. Compute capital expenditure and service flow already exceed 1% of U.S. GDP and are growing rapidly. The price of compute reflects uncertainty over AI adoption. The announced launch of compute futures turns this uncertainty into a tradable risk, raising questions on the pricing of a new asset class. We provide an early asset-pricing framework for compute. We begin by discussing the underlying compute rental market and its indexation. We then turn to pricing: 1) direct no-arbitrage links between futures prices and current spot prices fail due to the non-storable nature of compute, 2) synthetic futures prices from existing term rental contracts are likely upper bounds on true futures prices and, 3) upon financialization, futures prices will be investors' expectations of spot prices at expiration net of a risk premium. Using synthetic futures as stand-ins before the compute futures market launches, we construct the first compute futures return panel sorted by GPU generation and maturity. Our preliminary evidence is consistent with a positive compute risk premium, suggesting hedging pressure on the part of compute providers.

q-fin.PR↗

SHADE: Shrinkage via Halted Alpha-stable Denoising for Heavy-Tailed Probabilistic Time Series Forecasting

Time-series observations are particularly susceptible to noise, and many real-world series have low signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) together with heavy-tailed and time-varying disturbances. When Gaussian diffusion models are used for forecasting, reversing all the way to the zero-noise endpoint may yield an overly narrow and overconfident predictive distribution. We propose SHADE, an alpha-stable Lévy diffusion forecaster that reads out at a nonzero depth so that the residual stable kernel acts as distribution-level shrinkage. By decomposing halting risk into smoothing bias and estimation error, we develop a scale-calibrated halt for estimating the optimal shrinkage $τ^*$ and a context-amortized halt that requires no explicit noise labels. Gains concentrate in the extreme heavy-tailed regime $α\leq1.3$: Across synthetic noise settings, median CRPS improves by 21.7\%, while the NLL falls significantly; Cryptocurrency and foreign-exchange data provide further evidence of improved tail calibration in real-data implement. On near-light-tailed or high-SNR data, the model reverts to Gaussian diffusion or full denoising. SHADE maintains overall forecast error comparable to strong baselines while providing more honest tail uncertainty for heavy-tailed series.

q-fin.PR↗

FOMO: FLEX Options and Market Outcomes

FLEX options are customized exchange-traded contracts allowing participants to choose nonstandard strikes, expirations, exercise styles, and settlement terms while retaining central clearing. We investigate whether single-name FLEX activity leaves measurable footprints in regular listed-option markets and underlying equities. Using a linked dataset of FLEX consolidations, daily open-interest files, listed-option chains, equity returns, and corporate actions over 250 trading days (March 2025-March 2026) across 41 underlyings and 53 event dates, we document three primary empirical findings: (1) Matched-control difference-in-differences estimates reveal a robust post-event increase in listed-option open interest (beta = 0.3061, p = 0.0042, Benjamini-Hochberg p = 0.0168). (2) FLEX activity is strongly selected into high implied-volatility (IV) environments, concentrated in mid-price underlyings (date-fixed-effect ATM IV premium beta = 0.1235, p = 0.0030). (3) Event-day IV-minus-realized-volatility spreads predict execution-stressed short-straddle returns (beta = 0.0366, p = 0.0100). Short-lived equity return effects (CAR_0 difference of -0.85%, p = 0.0442) do not persist over 1-to-5-day horizons. Overall, FLEX activity serves primarily as an observable marker of institutional volatility demand and open-interest positioning rather than a directional stock-return predictor.

q-fin.PR↗